Pork Industry Urges Massachusetts to Alter, Delay Production Initiative

The National Pork Producers Council filed comments last week on two Massachusetts bills related to Question 3, a 2016 ballot initiative which prohibits the sale of pork produced using certain production methods.

5CC97372-4592-449C-BCCDE5B4F69B4460.jpg
5CC97372-4592-449C-BCCDE5B4F69B4460.jpg
(National Pork Board and the Pork Checkoff)

The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) filed comments last week on two Massachusetts bills related to Question 3, a 2016 ballot initiative which prohibits the sale of pork produced using certain production methods.

In many ways, Question 3 is substantially similar to Proposition 12, a California ballot initiative which passed in 2018, NPPC said in Capital Update on Friday.

The Massachusetts initiative is set to begin on Jan. 1, 2022, but first requires the commonwealth’s attorney general to draft implementation rules—which have not been completed. In its comments on S. 36 and H. 864, NPPC said it supports language that would place the Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources (MDAR) in charge of promulgating Question 3 regulations. At this time, the attorney general’s office has exclusive jurisdiction.

“Clear guidance is critical in ensuring that the regulatory requirements being developed are feasible and will not disrupt the supply of pork to Massachusetts consumers and NPPC commends the Attorney General for seeking out MDAR authority to put forth regulations,” NPPC wrote in the comments. “MDAR’s understanding of modern livestock and pork production, an industry that resides almost entirely outside the borders of the Commonwealth is critical. NPPC is hopeful that this collaboration will lead to a regulatory process that establishes substantive dialogue with the impacted stakeholders, not just farmers but throughout the entire supply chain, to develop final regulations.”

Additionally, NPPC is pressing for Question 3’s implementation date to be delayed by two years to Jan. 1, 2024.

“Meeting the requirements of Question 3 is difficult enough to do in normal conditions, requiring significant investments of labor and capital, as farmers must convert to a compliant system in order to meet Question 3’s requirements. The time and cost of this challenge has been exacerbated over the last two years as the industry struggles to overcome the challenges – both to our workers and to the marketplaces for pigs and pork – caused by COVID-19,” NPPC wrote.

A copy of NPPC’s comments is available here.

More from Farm Journal’s PORK:

Who Will Proposition 12 Hurt The Most?

Pork Producers Say Prop 12 Negates Science and Biden’s Climate Goals

U.S. Pork Processor Seeks to Delay Court Decision Limiting Slaughter Speeds

Vilsack Goes on Offense Re: Errant Meat Consumption Reports

Pork Daily Trusted by 14,000+ pork producers nationwide. Get the latest pork industry news and insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Read Next
After a devastating windstorm leveled his finishing barns in 2013, Kameron Donaldson leveraged community support and a data-driven partnership with Dykhuis Farms to secure a future for the next generation.
Get News Daily
Get Markets Alerts
Get News & Markets App