NPPC Says There’s ‘No Legitimate Reason’ for Farm Emissions Reporting Rule

EPA is trying to reinstate the reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA). Under EPCRA, livestock farmers would be required to estimate the emissions of certain gases.

Lagoon manure management
Lagoon manure management
(National Pork Board and the Pork Checkoff)

The National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) recently led a coalition of 48 state and national agricultural organizations in submitting comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposal to require livestock and poultry farmers to report routine air emissions from animal waste.

EPA is trying to reinstate the reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), NPPC shared in Capital Update. EPCRA requires certain entities to notify state and local authorities about accidental spills and releases of hazardous materials and chemicals. Under EPCRA, livestock farmers would be required to estimate the emissions of certain gases.

“Initially, EPA exempted agricultural producers from reporting routine farm emissions from the natural breakdown of animal manure, but in 2017 a federal Appeals court rejected the regulatory exemption. NPPC, along with partners in animal agriculture, immediately sought relief from Congress, which passed the Fair Agricultural Reporting Method (FARM) Act of 2018. The FARM Act once again exempted reporting of emissions. However, following EPA’s implementation, activist groups filed suit against EPA, which agreed to again examine the impact of routine farm emissions and whether new rules are necessary,” NPPC wrote.

NPPC voiced concerned because EPA has yet to finalize reliable, scientifically sound estimating methodologies that accurately represent the air emissions from animal manure at modern livestock farms using best management practices. As well, farmers could be subject to liabilities resulting from differing interpretations of the information called for in the reports, exposing them to potential civil penalties or litigation.

NPPC and other agricultural groups repeatedly have cited EPA’s own reasoning for exempting agriculture from the reporting requirements, noting that while farm emissions might exceed thresholds that would trigger responses under the reporting law, such responses would be “unnecessary, impractical and unlikely.”

For example, agitating a manure pit could result in the release of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, but the gases would dissipate quickly, and it would not constitute an emergency requiring the attention of first responders, NPPC pointed out.

“There is no legitimate reason for requiring [farmers] to report to state and local emergency response authorities estimates of the amount of air emissions from their animals’ manure,” the agricultural organizations wrote in their comments.


Pork Daily Trusted by 14,000+ pork producers nationwide. Get the latest pork industry news and insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Read Next
National Pork Board’s Chief Veterinarian outlines critical biosecurity measures and clinical signs to watch for as this parasitic fly expands its range. As one veterinarian said, “The best thing you can put on your animals now is your eyeballs.”
Get News Daily
Get Markets Alerts
Get News & Markets App