Implementation of California Proposition 12 Delayed, NPPC Reports

Pork-consuming California stakeholders negotiated with the state of California to extend the injunction against the implementation of Proposition 12 for whole pork.

Proposition 12
Proposition 12
(Canva.com)

Pork-consuming California stakeholders negotiated with the state of California to extend the injunction against the implementation of California Proposition 12 for whole pork, the National Pork Producers Council shared in a statement on Monday.

On Nov. 23, this coalition filed a joint stipulation with the Superior Court of Sacramento asking for an extension of the court’s injunction against implementation of Proposition 12 until July 1, 2023.

“Earlier this year, the Superior Court of Sacramento enjoined California’s implementation of Proposition 12 until 180 days after the final rules were issued. On September 1, 2022, California issued its final implementation rules, which would trigger enforcement and compliance by February 28, 2023,” NPPC wrote.

Members of the Food Equity Alliance, a statewide coalition of diverse consumer and business groups that rely on robust national supply chains of pork to provide nutrition to Californians, asked to extend the injunction until after the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decides on NPPC and the American Farm Bureau Federation’s constitutional challenge against California Proposition 12. The coalition consists of California grocery stores and restaurants, business organizations, food processors, and food equity supporters, including the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the Grocer Association, the Retailers Association and Kruse Meats.

The Food Equity Alliance said the lack of a delay in Proposition 12 implementation would “unfairly harm Latino and Asian grocers, restaurants and families who rely on pork as a primary source of protein in everyday meals.” As well, it would create food insecurity and increase food prices on small businesses and families who cannot afford it. In addition, it would make it impossible for producers to meet the Proposition 12 deadline – with the state missing the required deadline to provide guidelines and institute rule-making that’s fueling even more concerns about food supply and prices, the alliance said on its website.

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on California Proposition 12 on Oct. 11. Considering the pending SCOTUS decision, the parties of the California state action agreed that implementation of California Proposition 12 should be delayed further until the middle of 2023 after SCOTUS rules - which is anticipated in early 2023, NPPC wrote. The Superior Court of Sacramento is expected to approve the joint stipulation filed by the parties to this case, extending the injunction against implementation of Proposition 12 until July 1, 2023.

Read More from Farm Journal’s PORK:

A Historical Day: SCOTUS Hears Oral Arguments on Proposition 12

Follow California Proposition 12 SCOTUS Oral Arguments Live

Proposition 12 is Not the Way We Want to Care for Animals, Hays Says

How Prop 12 Could Impact Crop and Livestock Producers

Proposition 12 Will Push Pig Farmers Out of Business, NPPC and Farmers Say

Ironic Timing: NPPC, AFBF File Reply Brief on Prop 12, CDFA Finalizes Rules

Proposition 12 Compliancy: Don’t Do It for Free, Hollis Says

Why Agriculture Can’t Ignore Proposition 12 and Question 3

Pork Daily Trusted by 14,000+ pork producers nationwide. Get the latest pork industry news and insights delivered straight to your inbox.
Read Next
As skyrocketing property taxes and construction costs stall expansion plans, contract growers are pivoting toward operational efficiencies and technological investments to protect their tightening margins.
Get News Daily
Get Markets Alerts
Get News & Markets App