<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Margin Protection Program</title>
    <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/topics/margin-protection-program</link>
    <description>Margin Protection Program</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:03:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.porkbusiness.com/topics/margin-protection-program.rss" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" />
    <item>
      <title>Farm Bill Clears House Committee on Partisan Vote</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/farm-bill-clears-house-committee-partisan-vote</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        The House Agriculture Committee has long prided itself on bipartisanship, but partisan lines were sharply drawn as the panel approved a Republican-drawn farm bill Wednesday on a 26-20, party line vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
    &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
        &lt;div class="Quote"
            
            
             style="--color-quote-background: #fff;"&gt;

            &lt;div class="Quote-content"&gt;
                &lt;blockquote&gt;“This is a flawed bill. This is the fault of a bad and non-transparent process.” -- House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Collin Peterson (D-MN)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

                
            &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        “"Mr. Chairman, this is a flawed bill,” Ranking Member Collin Peterson (D-MN) said in his opening salvo of the hearing in comments directed at Agriculture Committee Chairman Mike Conaway (R-TX) “This is the fault of a bad and non-transparent process. When I was chairman, we marked the bill up in subcommittee. We didn’t do that this time. I oppose it and I urge my colleagues on my committee to oppose it as well.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democratic dissent on the farm bill proposal centers on work requirements for recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/article/peterson-no-farm-bill-amendments-cant-put-lipstick-on-a-pig/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Peterson told AgriTalk Radio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         earlier this week that he would offer no amendments to the bill and would simply oppose the entire bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republicans on the committee moved a package of 15 amendments to the farm bill during the hearing on topics ranging from crop insurance to biotechnology to broadband. The amendments include a provision put forward by Rodney Davis (R-IL) that would not allow producers to enroll in both the Agriculture Risk Coverage program and the Margin Protection Plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The farm bill now moves to the full House which is expected to vote on the measure next month. The Senate Agriculture Committee has not yet introduced their version of a farm bill for consideration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/farm-bill-clears-house-committee-partisan-vote</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bf25c5c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/640x360+0+0/resize/1440x810!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2FF3BC1CDC-C052-4CD6-94421EC3ABDD24D2.jpg" />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
