<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Inflation</title>
    <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/topics/inflation</link>
    <description>Inflation</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:19:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.porkbusiness.com/topics/inflation.rss" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" />
    <item>
      <title>Atlanta Fed Chair Bostic Recognizes Sectors of Agriculture Are in Crisis</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/atlanta-fed-chair-bostic-recognizes-sectors-agriculture-are-crisis</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Is an economic crisis brewing in farm country? That’s the question Raphael Bostic, outgoing president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, is watching as balance sheets carry over operating expenses into the 2026 season.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There’s a lot of distress in agricultural marketplaces and in a lot of our agricultural enterprises,” Bostic says. “I do think there’s a significant crisis here.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During a fireside chat at the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/top-producer-summit" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;2026 Top Producer Summit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , he recognized the challenges facing farmers in today’s financial environment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I get to talk to a lot of smaller family farms and I worry about them, especially because the big operations, they are so large scale, it gives you a diversity of possible strategies,” Bostic explains. “You can tap into different types of credit that can allow you to weather volatility a bit more readily, and we don’t see that for a lot of the smaller folks.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To help, USDA is set to release $12 billion in “
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/breaking-usda-releases-farmer-bridge-assistance-acre-rates" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Farmers Bridge Assistance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        ” payments toward the end of the month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“This is a short-run patch on something that could be a long-run problem,” Bostic says.&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h2&gt;Rising Expenses and the Growing Debt Burden&lt;/h2&gt;
    
        USDA is expecting net farm income to be $153.4 billion, which is down $4.1 billion from 2025. Economists say this year’s latest outlook continues to reflect declining receipts and an ongoing reliance on help from the government, which is expected to increase by 45% in 2026 alone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Total production expenses are forecast to increase almost $5 billion or 1%,” says USDA economist Carrie Litkowski. “On the farm sector balance sheet, assets, debt and equity are all forecast to increase.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The latest Purdue University - CME Group Ag Economy Barometer in January found 21% of farmers surveyed expect their operating loan to increase over a year ago. Of those, a third say it’s because they’re carrying over unpaid operating debt from the prior year. In 2023 that number was only 5%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We know that input prices for a host of products are up,” Bostic says. “We know that competition at a global level is up. We know that the tariffs have put tremendous pressure on the competitiveness of American products overseas because of those dynamics, and we also know many commodity prices haven’t changed to offset these things. These are all incredibly challenging dynamics to wrestle with, and how we move forward is really an open question.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h2&gt;Fed Policy: Why Patience is Required for Rate Cuts&lt;/h2&gt;
    
        The Fed’s primary mandate of stable prices and maximum employment provides an environment with predictable growth, giving people the opportunity to invest for the long haul without having to worry about where the economy will be in five to 10 years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“First we have to diagnose the problem,” Bostic says. “Is this an issue with labor availability, an issue in new technology or shifting climate patterns, etc., and then we need to think about what strategies will work for all of these new things.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That mandate requires patience in seeing how current monetary policy impacts the market. Bostic notes inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%, but economic growth has been and will continue to be robust. One thing he’s not advocating for is a continuation of interest rate cuts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The government shutdown actually prevented a lot of data from being produced, so it is actually going to make the numbers a bit choppier in the next several months,” Bostic explains. “The usual signals we would get from those [reports] are actually going to be weaker than they would be otherwise. For me, that’s another reason why I think we want to be cautious. We want to be patient, and I think that’ll be prudent.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Patience ahead of additional rate cuts would allow the Federal Reserve to see how tax cuts and deregulation stimulate growth into 2026 before cutting rates, which could spur inflation even further above the Fed’s target.&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-5b0000" name="image-5b0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/abdb9f5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/568x379!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ebf5029/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/768x512!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ea8d694/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/1024x683!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/80c2554/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/1440x960!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/49dc4f5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Bostic_Watts.jpeg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1a137aa/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/568x379!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/90ce34e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/768x512!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c5543d1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/1024x683!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/49dc4f5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg 1440w" width="1440" height="960" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/49dc4f5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/7008x4672+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F46%2F59%2F7f3b3704457999c488d2dc33a87d%2Fbostic-watts.jpeg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;At the 2026 Top Producer Summit, Raphael Bostic, president and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, joins Bill Watts, Pro Farmer editor, to share insights into the economic forces shaping monetary policy and what that could mean for agriculture.&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal )&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        The ag economy is seeing similar challenges to the economy as a whole. Bostic remarks while the top end of the economy is doing remarkably well, there is a growing number of U.S. consumers who are living paycheck to paycheck, evidenced by the increased rhetoric around a K-shaped economy. That has made itself evident in the ag economy by higher consolidation, with big farms getting bigger and smaller farms going out of business.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“This economy has continued to perform well at an aggregate level; consumers have continued to be resilient, and that’s a good thing,” Bostic says. “My outlook is that the resilience we’ve seen for much of 2025 will continue into 2026 and might even get a bit stronger, so we might actually see some of the tax benefits, some of the deregulation, those things could actually spur the economy to do even more than what it did last year.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h2&gt;Consolidation and the Transformative Potential of AI&lt;/h2&gt;
    
        The latest red flag, a sluggish labor market has Bostic waiting on data and wondering if technology or AI are having an outsized role in the current new-hire economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“When you think about AI, for example, and those technologies, businesses are experimenting with ways to have AI introduced into their production processes to allow productivity that doesn’t require people,” Bostic admits. “You may have heard reports about a lot of entry-level hiring has happened at a much lower pace than it has in previous years. A lot of that is because the promise of AI has folks thinking, well, maybe I don’t need to do those hires, and I can get that same amount of productivity. That’s a structural change.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From a farming perspective, those opportunities are also presenting themselves. Given the current challenges in agriculture, Bostic says it might be time to look at new ways to build toward the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“To the extent that work can be done, that is, generative, without necessarily needing a person to be there all the time, that’s potentially transformative,” Bostic says. “I know the day is long, seasons are hard, and if you can use technology to take two hours out of it that gives you space to do other things. The opportunity there is what do you do with that extra space?”&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 00:19:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/atlanta-fed-chair-bostic-recognizes-sectors-agriculture-are-crisis</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6e7c162/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1280x720+0+0/resize/1440x810!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F80%2F07%2F0cd241374ea8b8f5217331e07ebc%2F6621ed0929734ddbaecf74b85338a97e%2Fposter.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ag Economists Warn of Lingering Farm Economic Strain: ’Not the 1980s, But Close’</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/ag-economists-warn-lingering-farm-economic-strain-not-1980s-close</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        The October 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         paints a tough picture for U.S. farmers heading into 2026: weak trade demand, stubbornly high input costs and continued consolidation across agriculture. While experts say today’s challenges don’t match the full-blown crisis of the 1980s, most agree the current downturn is dragging on with few signs of a quick turnaround.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“High input costs and the inability of domestic soybean crush growth to offset lost Chinese demand” continue to weigh heavily on profitability, one economist explains.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another adds: “The lack of trade opportunities, and high input costs, are doing the most damage right now.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A third economist sums it up more bluntly: “Margins are collapsing, and optimism is evaporating fast.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-eb0000" name="image-eb0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="961" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1e838d9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/568x379!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/97acb22/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/768x513!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/01238f5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/1024x683!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7b01fbe/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/1440x961!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="961" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/11ee567/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/1440x961!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Monthly Monitor By the Numbers.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9345437/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/568x379!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/813146e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/768x513!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e2d20d7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/1024x683!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/11ee567/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/1440x961!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="961" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/11ee567/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1667x1112+0+0/resize/1440x961!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2Fb9%2F954a78fc4c7dacd40a78001920c2%2Fmonthly-monitor-by-the-numbers.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;By the numbers, here are highlights from the latest Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor.&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lori Hayes )&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conditions Expected to Continue or Worsen Into 2026&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;One of the major themes in the latest survey is the fact negative margins could be a theme for row crop agriculture for the foreseeable future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nearly 60% (59%) of economists say the farm economy is worse off than a month ago, and almost 90% believe it’s weaker than last year. 76% expect the situation to persist or even worsen through 2026, while only a quarter expect any improvement in the next 12 months. As one economist puts it: “It’s not a collapse, but it’s a grind.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-4e0000" name="image-4e0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a79d628/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/568x379!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bf8d72d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/768x512!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/642b9a9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1024x683!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a6b7c48/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/096e0d2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Ag Economy Outlook - WEB LEAD IMAGE.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1041832/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/568x379!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/903c9fd/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/768x512!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3a64dd6/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1024x683!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/096e0d2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="960" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/096e0d2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fdd%2F5b%2F8c609a4c432fbbd00db0832675bc%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-ag-economy-outlook-web-lead-image.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Others emphasize the fatigue setting in across the countryside. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Farmers have been absorbing higher costs for two years without any real recovery in prices,” says one respondent. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“That wears on you,” another adds. “It’s like death by a thousand cuts — not one thing is breaking the farm economy, but everything’s contributing.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-d40000" name="image-d40000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8f80138/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b70650e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6492cbe/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c139422/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d85286f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Charts - WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6ae4f5a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/16beb3d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e46c113/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d85286f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d85286f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        With nearly eight out of every 10 economists surveyed projecting conditions to persist or worsen over the next 12 months, Ben Brown, University of Missouri Extension economist, says it reiterates the concern that farmers could face more tough decisions next year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think the expectation for conditions to stay challenging shows up in multiple points of the responses, just this continued downturn and extended pressure on farm finances absent some type of market rally. Maybe that’s a yield shortfall due to drought somewhere in the world. But absent of that, I think we’re this slow grind lower trying to figure out how to find an equilibrium point where producers are looking at moving cropland out of production, maybe putting it to more pasture or CRP,” Brown says. “Long story short, we’re looking for any of those available measures that reduce production enough to help rally prices.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="ag-economists-say-todays-struggles-arent-the-1980s-farm-crisis-but-theyre-uncomfortably-close" name="ag-economists-say-todays-struggles-arent-the-1980s-farm-crisis-but-theyre-uncomfortably-close"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement-player"&gt;&lt;bsp-brightcove-player data-video-player class="BrightcoveVideoPlayer"
    data-account="5176256085001"
    data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss"
    data-video-id="6383589928112"
    data-video-title="Ag Economists Say Today’s Struggles Aren’t the 1980s Farm Crisis — But They’re Uncomfortably Close"
    
    &gt;

    &lt;video class="video-js" id="BrightcoveVideoPlayer-6383589928112" data-video-id="6383589928112" data-account="5176256085001" data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss" data-embed="default" controls  &gt;&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/bsp-brightcove-player&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        Even livestock markets, one of the few bright spots, come with caveats. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Livestock returns have been better than nearly anyone expected at the beginning of the year,” one economist notes, “especially cattle and hogs.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But another warns: “If consumer spending slows down, beef and pork demand could take a hit, and that changes the outlook quickly.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Echoes of the 1980s — But Not the Same&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;While 69% of economists say today’s farm economy shows similarities to the 1980s crisis, most stress the safety nets are stronger now. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There are far more safeguards today: crop insurance, FSA loan programs and countercyclical payments,” one economist says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, they caution against complacency. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“While farm bankruptcies may increase, it’s not likely to reach the 1980s level,” another economist adds, “but let’s not understate how bad things are now.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another adds: “The lack of profitability for row crops and the number of farmers exiting the industry — that’s what feels eerily familiar.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-c70000" name="image-c70000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8f80138/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b70650e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6492cbe/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c139422/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d85286f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Charts - WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6ae4f5a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/16beb3d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e46c113/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d85286f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d85286f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F95%2F69%2F009e16914d50be7ad6baadcf0129%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;One economist offers a sobering parallel, saying: “Things are bad — even if it’s not the same type of bad as the ’80s. The difference is this time, it’s a slow burn instead of a crash.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;University of Missouri’s Brown says the similarities between now and the 1980s are glaring: Profitability and working capital have eroded for several consecutive years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“That liquidity issue is really starting to impact some of the broader financial indicators,” he says. “That’s what’s similar [to the 1980s] is the tight liquidity margins. We’ve seen farm bankruptcies start to take up as well. They’re not as high as what we saw during the 1980s yet.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet, Brown points out there are some clear differences, as well as indicators, such as land values, that signal this period is vastly different from the 1980s.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Farm Consolidation Pressures Mount&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;Nearly all economists see continued consolidation reshaping rural America. 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/ag-economy/survey-high-91-ag-economists-say-crop-sector-recession-losses-likely-throu" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;In the September survey&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , 91% of ag economists said they expect the current situation to accelerate the current rate of consolidation in agriculture. In this month’s survey, economists think this will cause fewer, larger farms, fewer service centers and higher barriers for beginning farmers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Larger operations will get larger, and we’ll lose some of the diversity that smaller producers bring to the industry,” one respondent says. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another adds: “Fewer, larger farms mean fewer families in rural communities — and less political and economic diversity.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-360000" name="image-360000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9de1c04/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/922e2ca/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1e76a6c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1cb0d07/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/289da3b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Charts - WEB2.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7859554/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ee66224/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8d7e86d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/289da3b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/289da3b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F78%2F17%2F656261644b0d87fafa8c8dd31ea9%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web2.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound )&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Some economists express concern over how this trend could alter the future of farming. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Higher barriers to entry for young farmers, dwindling rural populations and loss of local ag suppliers — that’s where we’re headed,” one respondent warns. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another sums it up: “We’re becoming a nation of mega farms. That’s efficient, but it’s not healthy.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Livestock Outlook Still a Bright Spot&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;Nearly half of the economists expect the cattle bull market to continue for another 19 to 24 months, while others see a slowdown by late 2026 as herd rebuilding begins. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“At current prices, we’ll see no or little herd expansion,” one economist warns. “Clear signals that domestic beef production is increasing may be the key catalyst for a market top.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-840000" name="image-840000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/08e9291/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/568x379!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/79532d5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/768x512!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4b932fb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1024x683!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e36e943/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/da50669/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Cattle Prices - WEB LEAD IMAGE.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/166d031/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/568x379!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4a9d6ae/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/768x512!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ca745cf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1024x683!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/da50669/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="960" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/da50669/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F58%2F06%2F27a78a3c4c76bd5393bcb2de7f48%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-cattle-prices-web-lead-image.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsay Pound )&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Others were more optimistic, saying the current supply and demand picture will continue to provide fuel to the current cattle market. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Tight supply and strong global demand could keep this market higher for longer,” one respondent writes, “but beef demand depends on consumers continuing to open their wallets.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another adds: “The market’s got legs — but it’s walking on thin ice.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-e80000" name="image-e80000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/28921ee/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/20066ec/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1506add/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/fa30c92/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3c4aca2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Charts - WEB8.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/97b3eca/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ed1d0a2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a802c7e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3c4aca2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3c4aca2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd5%2F49%2F02490cc846078045089bc3ef57ee%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web8.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        It’s key to note this survey was conducted prior to 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.drovers.com/news/ag-policy/beef-producers-react-usdas-plan-fortify-industry-and-trumps-social-media-comments" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;President Donald Trump saying the U.S. would start importing more beef from Argentina, while also suggesting the White House is working to bring beef prices down&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . Once that news broke this week, the cattle markets crashed, sending cattle futures limit down. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Why are U.S. farmers and ranchers furious about the Trump administration’s new allegiance with Argentina? Arlan Suderman says it’s all part of a 3D chess match with China. He explains the complex relationship, and the impact on U.S. farmers and ranchers, in the video below. &lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="farmers-fed-up-trumps-argentina-alliance-sparks-anger-among-farmers-and-ranchers" name="farmers-fed-up-trumps-argentina-alliance-sparks-anger-among-farmers-and-ranchers"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement-player"&gt;&lt;bsp-brightcove-player data-video-player class="BrightcoveVideoPlayer"
    data-account="5176256085001"
    data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss"
    data-video-id="6383594305112"
    data-video-title="Farmers Fed Up: Trump’s Argentina Alliance Sparks Anger Among Farmers and Ranchers"
    
    &gt;

    &lt;video class="video-js" id="BrightcoveVideoPlayer-6383594305112" data-video-id="6383594305112" data-account="5176256085001" data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss" data-embed="default" controls  &gt;&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/bsp-brightcove-player&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Trade Troubles Deepen&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;China’s cooling appetite for U.S. ag products remains a major worry. The October survey found 76% of economists believe China won’t return to 2022 purchasing levels, and 88% say pre-trade-war demand is gone for good.&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-cc0000" name="image-cc0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1be85bd/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/33aebe3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9a9891e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7d80d22/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1c8b60c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Charts - WEB3.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/65a5bd7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/75a8082/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/beb9966/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1c8b60c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1c8b60c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F69%2F63%2F8ca317e24b4ca83433a6ffa3ce6b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web3.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        “China has been working toward deleveraging from the U.S. for two decades,” one expert says. “This is the culmination of a long-term process.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another wrote: “China will not purchase U.S. ag products unless it has to; it will always prefer other suppliers.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-e80001" name="image-e80001"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/edf9edc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/568x379!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/371dc2e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/768x512!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b1fe0e4/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1024x683!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/04f9d16/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="960" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/beed24a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - China - WEB LEAD IMAGE.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4c60333/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/568x379!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d44ec38/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/768x512!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8aa0669/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1024x683!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/beed24a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="960" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/beed24a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F14%2Fbc%2Fa8bb08ed4ddaa692207d379f2f34%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-china-web-lead-image.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound )&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        The biggest winner? Brazil. When asked who’s winning the trade war between the U.S. and China, 100% of economists said Brazil.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Brazil has definitely benefited; it’s literally being handed additional market share,” another economist notes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Others agree: “Make Brazil great again — that’s what’s happening,” one quips. Several economists warn if the U.S. doesn’t aggressively pursue new markets, “our export position could permanently erode.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-860000" name="image-860000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/5e9f9f5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a2104c6/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d4cad83/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/774b63b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3a7d742/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2025 - Charts - WEB4.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b94cd91/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/22748f3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b657d1c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3a7d742/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3a7d742/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Ff7%2Fc4%2Fafb6f73749439567901f355cb35f%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-charts-web4.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Looking Ahead&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;Despite stronger farm balance sheets and fixed-rate debt, the mix of low profitability, high costs and global oversupply continues to pressure producers. Labor shortages, rising cash rents and limited trade growth are adding to the strain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Rising cash rents are eating into margins faster than yields or prices can recover,” one economist says. &lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="HtmlModule"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="html-embed-module-fa0000" name="html-embed-module-fa0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    &lt;iframe src="https://omny.fm/shows/agritalk/agritalk-10-23-25-jacquie-holland/embed?style=Cover" width="100%" height="180" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write" frameborder="0" title="AgriTalk-10-23-25-Jacquie Holland"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


    
        Another points to policy fatigue: “There’s too much focus on short-term trade aid and not enough long-term market strategy.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As one respondent summarizes: “Things are bad, even if it’s not the same kind of bad as the 1980s. We’re in a long, grinding cycle — and patience is wearing thin.”&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/ag-economists-warn-lingering-farm-economic-strain-not-1980s-close</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8edb4d3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x800+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F41%2Fe2%2Fe23969c0438283ca09ece8718286%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2025-q2-1980s-farm-crisis-comparison-web-lead-image.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lift the Fog: 4 Drivers of Farm Profitability To Watch in 2025</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/lift-fog-4-drivers-watch-farm-profitability-2025</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        What is the status of the general ag economy? On the surface, strong livestock prices and recent government payments are making the farm sector look more positive than reality. Here are four drivers of farm profitability to watch this year and a glimpse into 2026.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;There’s More Than Meets The Eye&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.farmermac.com/thefeed/a-farm-income-upswing-amid-tariff-turbulence/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;As highlighted by Farmer Mac&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , an aggregate view of the agricultural economy doesn’t give a clear view of the driving forces and notably, the unknowns surrounding trade policy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Farmer Mac highlights how the strength of the U.S. dollar might be the largest driver of commodity price movements over the past several months. A stronger dollar can make U.S. commodities more expensive on the global market, whereas a weaker dollar can lead to higher domestic prices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Input Costs Vs. Commodity Prices&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The grain complex is under a lot of pressure,” says John Newton with Terrain Ag. “USDA just released their new cost of production estimates for 2026. We’re looking at record input costs for a number of crops. And commodity prices aren’t showing any signs of really rebounding.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/commodity-costs-and-returns" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Per USDA, &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        per-acre cost of production for corn in 2026 is forecast to be $915.51 — up from $897.44 in 2025. For soybeans, cost of production per acre is forecast to be $650.34 — compared with $639.15 in 2025. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Newton says the $30 billion in ad hoc payments to farmers approved by Congress is helping farmer sentiment and the ag economy’s health.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Looking to the next year, that ad hoc support is not guaranteed to be there. Hopefully there’s more ‘farm’ in the farm bill because that’s also retroactive to the 2025 crop year. But again, input costs are projected to increase. Every single category is projected to be higher next year than this year. The only category projected to be lower is interest expenses,” he says. “Looking forward to 2026, it’s going to be a tight margin environment unless we get some strong tailwinds in agriculture.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For livestock producers, the lower commodity prices have continued to bring lower feed costs. Specifically for swine feed costs, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://farmdocdaily.illinois.edu/2025/06/prospects-for-swine-feed-costs-in-the-second-half-of-2025.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;2024 ticked downward&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , with lower costs expected through the rest of the year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Interest Rates and Farmer Credit Health&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It’s a cash flow situation in the ag sector. That’s why they’re holding off on any large expenditures if they can. That’s the name of the game, which is why Congress has to approve a farm safety net. If they don’t, we’re in a world of hurt in the ag sector,” says Jim Wiesemeyer, a Washington policy analyst.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier this week, the Fed left interest rates unchanged.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think the Fed is locked in, and it could be September at the earliest, if not October, before they actually have the data they want to begin cutting interest rates,” Wiesemeyer says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Newton agrees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“They’re waiting for inflation to heat up. They’re waiting for if unemployment is going to heat up. We continue to beat expectations on all of those,” Newton says. “We had negative GDP growth the first quarter. If that continues — if unemployment ticks up, if inflation ticks up, that’s what they’re watching for.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, using data from the first quarter, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.kansascityfed.org/agriculture/agfinance-updates/gradual-deterioration-in-agricultural-credit-conditions-continues" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;the KC Fed released a report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         showing deteriorating ag credit conditions. Ty Kreitman and Morgan Mastrianni point to data showing how demand for farm loans continued to grow as farm finances tightened, but credit availability was steady. From their report, more lenders say they had tighter credit standards — the highest in over a decade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;USDA’s Next Net Cash Farm Income Report&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;In September, USDA will release its update on Net Cash Farm Income (NCFI).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“A knee-jerk reaction might be that USDA is likely to reduce its forecast for NCFI in September,” said a Farmer Mac report. “The reality is numerous factors influence farm sector revenues and profits.”
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:13:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/lift-fog-4-drivers-watch-farm-profitability-2025</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1cd015d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/5000x3333+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F34%2F8c%2Fe0170b3c4f02abffc6ceb957dc18%2Fweather-rain-clouds-thunderstorm-aerial-land-lindsey-pound.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Economists Fear the U.S. Will See a Recession in 2025, And That Could Eat Into Consumers' Demand for Meat</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/economists-fear-u-s-will-see-recession-2025-and-could-eat-consumers-demand-meat</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Consumer meat sales hit record-breaking levels last year. The craze for protein-filled diets has been a storyline that’s helped drive meat demand, which is good news for meat producers. Ag economists warn, however, the major limiting factor for meat demand, and meat prices, in 2025 just may be what happens in the overall economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;March Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         asked economists if they think the U.S. general economy will see a recession in 2025, and 62% said yes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recent reports agree with that sentiment, as the Federal Reserve’s key inflation index rose more than expected in February and consumer spending posted a smaller-than-projected increase, according to the Commerce Department. Both could be warning signs of what’s ahead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a follow up question, The Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor survey asked, “In what ways does the U.S. economy impact meat demand in 2025?” Respondents had no shortage of opinions on that. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here’s a rundown of some of their reactions:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class="rte2-style-ul"&gt;&lt;li&gt;“If real wages fall, there will be a substitution toward other protein/cheaper meat cuts.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Slower growth (even if the U.S. does not endure a recession) will reduce consumer willingness to spend, especially at a time when beef prices, in particular, are high.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“A downturn in economic growth impacts disposable income and should slow animal protein demand.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“There is a positive correlation between GDP and meat demand, particularly between GDP and higher end cuts.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“When the U.S. economy is strong and incomes increase, consumers have more disposable income to spend on meat and higher quality cuts of meat. When the U.S. economy is weak and disposable income tightens, consumers may reduce meat in their diet or turn to less expensive meat options.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Not all economists expect U.S. consumer demand to fall off though, even if the U.S. officially enters into a recession.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Labor income is growing faster than inflation. Most U.S. firms are profitable - at least as of current earnings reports,” said one economist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another shared, “I do think consumer demand will be lower in 2025 than it was in 2024. That being said - 2024 consumer expenditures and demand were a lot higher than I anticipated at the beginning of the year. Two indicators that are showing up, and are unsustainable right now, are reducing savings accounts and increasing credit card debt. I think it leads to slower meat demand in 2025, partially due to lower meat availability and partially due to slowing consumer demand. Notice I said ‘slowing’ consumer demand and not ‘declining/negative’. Demand does not have to decline year-over-year to impact meat prices. Slowing can do the same thing.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;The GLP-1 Effect&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;What could have an even bigger impact on meat demand, and even more so than inflation and a recession, is the use of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss. GLP-1 drugs not only moderate users’ blood sugar levels, but also affect their appetites by suppressing hunger cravings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“U.S. consumer preference for meat demand is strong, though I would be paying attention to the growing use of GLP-1s as it relates to all agricultural product demand,” one economist responded.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The good news is studies have shown those who use GLP-1 drugs often crave healthier items and often consume more protein versus unhealthy foods. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Starting From a Place of Strength&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Forecasting meat demand in 2025 relies on a number of factors. But a positive trend is how consumers, especially the millennial generation, are buying more meat. 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/millennials-and-protein-craze-boost-meat-sales-record-high" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;As PorkBusiness.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         reported this week, consumers are buying more meat than ever. In 2024, meat sales hit a record high of $104.6 billion and total pounds sold increased by 2.3%, which was cited in the latest Power of Meat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More people want meat today, but economists are concerned any economic pain could eat into overall meat demand.
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 17:56:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/economists-fear-u-s-will-see-recession-2025-and-could-eat-consumers-demand-meat</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/737c87b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/5000x3333+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F88%2F45%2F2391680447afa2f8099125b5b72b%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-03-2025-recession-web.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Do Tariffs Work? Leading Ag Economists Weigh In</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/ag-policy/do-tariffs-work-answer-isnt-straightforward-you-may-think</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Tariffs are a tool used by President Donald Trump during both his terms. But do they work? Not even ag economists are in alignment, as the answer seems to be: It depends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This past weekend, Trump 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/trump-officially-signs-three-executive-orders-imposing-25-tariffs-canada-and" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;signed three executive orders for tariffs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , the first time a president has used powers granted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The orders also include retaliation clauses that would ramp up tariffs if the countries respond in kind. Trump cut the levy on imports of Canadian energy to 10%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By Monday morning, Trump had agreed to 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/trump-agrees-delay-tariffs-goods-mexico-30-days" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;delay tariffs on goods from Mexico for one month&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         to allow more time for negotiations. The agreement happened just hours before the tariffs were set to take effect.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Claudia Sheinbaum said U.S. tariffs against Mexico will be delayed for one month after a conversation with Trump on Monday. Trump then confirmed the news on Truth Social. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Which Input Could Be Impacted Most by Tariffs?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tariffs on the U.S.'s top three trading partners could have a major impact on agriculture. The January Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor asked economists which input is most at risk. The top answer was fertilizer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-6c0000" name="image-6c0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/74bc9a0/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/869d687/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c0e92d7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7e1cd9b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/03e4684/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 01-2024 - Tariffs on inputs - WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/0609231/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/0713898/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/17fb78c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/03e4684/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/03e4684/2147483647/strip/true/crop/3500x1771+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fe1%2F13%2Fd693ffa04285830821c85d15c63e%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-01-2024-tariffs-on-inputs-web.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Lindsey Pound)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        “From a headline standpoint, it’s probably potash,” says Samuel Taylor, farm inputs analyst, Rabobank.&lt;i&gt; “&lt;/i&gt;We get 85% to 90% of our potash from imports from the Canadian market. The residual is made up by Russia and Israel, in principle, with some other markets coming in.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One day after Trump announced he would move ahead with planned tariffs, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated tariffs targeting $30 billion in American products, such as alcohol, produce, household goods and industrial materials, will roll out in two phases starting Feb. 4, the same day the U.S. tariffs are set to begin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The tariffs on the other $125 billion worth of goods will come in 21 days to allow impacted Canadian companies to adjust their supply chains. Trudeau emphasized Canada’s response would be “strong but appropriate,” while also considering non-tariff measures such as restrictions on critical minerals.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="HtmlModule"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="html-embed-module-d50000" name="html-embed-module-d50000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    &lt;a href="https://farmjournal.info/3A5JlpL" target="_blank"&gt;
    &lt;img src="https://k1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/brightspot/65/17/f90c38ae49949c520cfcc340c636/1.png"&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;


    
        &lt;b&gt;Do Tariffs Work?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With tariffs and a potential trade war brewing that begs the question: Do tariffs work? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It’s something Farm Journal asked the nearly 70 ag economists part of the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Farm Journal Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         The survey asked economists: “Do tariffs work in trade policy?” Economists views were mixed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class="rte2-style-ul"&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Tariffs can work in trade policy — that’s why nations continue to use them. The complex part that extends beyond the tariff action is potential long-term repercussions that can result from trade flow changes.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“In limited cases, typically only if they result in a policy response in the targeted country. Much of the time, tariffs are like cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Tariffs provide short-term gains but have always failed relative to free trade in the long term.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Absolutely, when properly applied.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Not over the long term. They tend to affect who gets to supply different markets around the world.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;The Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor also asked: “When tariffs are used as a ‘tool’ in trade, who pays the tariff?” Not all economists were aligned on that answer either, saying sometimes it’s farmers and consumers, but it can also be the exporting countries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul class="rte2-style-ul"&gt;&lt;li&gt;“When the U.S. imposes tariffs on imports, importers in the U.S. pay taxes to the U.S. government on their purchases from abroad. When another nation imposes tariffs, importers in that nation pay import taxes to their government on their purchases from abroad. Often, when a tariff is implemented, another nation retaliates, and you end up with importers in both nations paying the price on whatever products the tariffs apply toward.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“If an importing country places a tariff on the exporting country, producers in the exporting country and consumers in the importing country both lose (i.e., receive lower and higher prices, respectively). Conversely, producers in the importing country and consumers in the exporting country win (i.e., receive higher and lower prices, respectively).”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“In the short run, consumers who purchase goods with a tariff might see higher prices if the tariff is not absorbed elsewhere. In the long run, the tariff might result in changes to the supply chain that result in higher prices but also create other economic opportunities in America (e.g. reshoring of domestic manufacturing).”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“The correct economist answer is: It depends. Tariffs drive a wedge between prices in the exporting country and in the importing country. It depends on the circumstances of particular markets and how much is reflected in higher prices in the importing country and reduced prices in the exporting country.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Both the exporting nation and the importing consumer pay some portion of the tariff depending on who has more flexibility to adjust to trade barrier. If exporting countries can easily switch to supplying other markets, they won’t have to ‘pay.’ If consumers can easily find cheap substitute goods, they won’t have to pay.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/ag-policy/do-tariffs-work-answer-isnt-straightforward-you-may-think</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/504f888/2147483647/strip/true/crop/640x360+0+0/resize/1440x810!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2F2018-03%2F640x360_80123C00-IXXZW.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Presidential Poll Results: How Farmers and Economists View Candidates' Impact on Agriculture</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/presidential-poll-results-how-farmers-and-economists-view-candidates-impact-agriculture</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Nov. 5 — election day — is fast approaching. A few weeks ago, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/take-our-poll-5-questions-ahead-presidential-election" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;we asked which candidate do you believe will have a more positive impact on farming policy programs, trade, biofuels policies and inflation.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Based on 4,776 respondents, here are the results:&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
    &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://flo.uri.sh/visualisation/19733380/embed" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" height="575" width="700" style="width:100%;" title="Interactive or visual content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
        We also asked about the candidate’s impact on agriculture overall. Here’s that breakdown by state. Make note of the seven swing states, Georgia, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Pennsylvania and North Carolina, outlined in black.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
    &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;&lt;iframe src="https://flo.uri.sh/visualisation/19739165/embed" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" height="575" width="700" style="width:100%;" title="Interactive or visual content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Farmer Rationale On Harris Vs. Trump&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        While various polls suggest Trump has a clear edge among rural voters and there’s significant support for Trump among farmers, Jim Wiesemeyer, Farm Journal Washington correspondent, is quick to remind the community is not uniform in its voting intentions, with policy preferences and personal values driving individual decisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In general terms, Wiesemeyer says farmers support Trump because they:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Believe Trump better understands rural America and agricultural issues&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Are concerned about his trade policies and confrontation with China&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Have concerns about border security and illegal immigration under the current Biden/Harris administration&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Are of the opinion Trump will lower costs for farmers, especially related to energy&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Oppose what they view as socialist or anti-American policies from Democrats&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Farmers support Harris because they:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Back environmental policies and renewable energy&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Approve of the Biden/Harris administration’s efforts to strengthen farm workers’ rights&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Believe in Harris’ food and nutrition policies&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Support Harris’ economic policies aimed at working-class Americans&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;Economists’ Views On Harris Vs. Trump &lt;/h3&gt;
    
        The September Ag Economists Monthly Monitor, a Farm Journal survey of nearly 70 ag economists, revealed a more mixed view of the presidential candidates’ impact on trade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When asked if a Harris or Trump administration would help or hurt trade, the survey found the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-6d0000" name="image-6d0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1028" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8974125/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/568x405!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/92334d9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/768x548!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9087b8d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1024x731!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/801247b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1440x1028!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1028" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3deaffb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1440x1028!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2024 - Harris or Trump Administration Hurt or Help Trade - WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ac6f95d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/568x405!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/55b31bf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/768x548!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3a4d423/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1024x731!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3deaffb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1440x1028!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1028" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3deaffb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1440x1028!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F4b%2F71%2Fad48629c4e228a61d55243a8e11d%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-harris-or-trump-administration-hurt-or-help-trade-web.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;“Farmers are definitely concerned about trade,” says Michael Langemeir, an agricultural economist from Purdue University who helps author the Purdue University/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer and is one of the economists surveyed by Farm Journal each month. “We don’t ask specific questions related to tariffs in the Ag Economy Barometer, but one question we do ask is if they expect exports to increase, decrease or stay the same? Really, this is the most pessimistic they’ve been for about five years with regard to trade.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tariffs are a tool both the former Trump administration and the current Biden/Harris administration have used.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During the first presidential debate, Trump didn’t waver from his staunch stance on tariffs and trade, reiterating his plan to use tariffs to protect U.S. industries and increase revenues. Trump reinforced his plan to impose a 10% tariff on all imported goods and a 60% tariff on goods from China.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During the debate, Harris stated tariffs are essentially a “sales tax” on American households. The Biden/Harris administration recently extended the Trump-era tariffs, while also imposing its own set of tariffs in May. Biden directed the U.S. Trade Representative to “increase tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 on $18 billion of imports from China to protect American workers and businesses.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“That’s why I get really worried when both candidates start talking about tariffs. It’s really uncharted waters, if you will. There’s already the perception we’re struggling a little bit with trade. As we enter these uncertain waters, we’re going to struggle more,” Langemeier explains.&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;Do Tariffs Work?&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        The controversy over tariffs and if they’re a good trade policy tool is long standing. The September Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor asked economists: “Do tariffs work in trade policy?” Economists views were mixed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Tariffs can work in trade policy — that’s why nations continue to use them. The complex part that extends beyond the tariff action is potential long-term repercussions that can result from trade flow changes.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“In limited cases, typically only if they result in a policy response in the targeted country. Much of the time, tariffs are like cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Tariffs provide short-term gains but have always failed relative to free trade in the long term.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Absolutely, when properly applied.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Not over the long term. They tend to affect who gets to supply different markets around the world.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;The September Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor also asked: “When tariffs are used as a ‘tool’ in trade, who pays the tariff?” Not all economists were aligned on that answer either, saying sometimes it’s farmers and consumers, but it can also be the exporting countries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;“When the U.S. imposes tariffs on imports, importers in the U.S. pay taxes to the U.S. government on their purchases from abroad. When another nation imposes tariffs, importers in that nation pay import taxes to their government on their purchases from abroad. Often when a tariff is implemented, another nation retaliates, and you end up with importers in both nations paying the price on whatever products the tariffs apply toward.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“If an importing country places a tariff on the exporting country, producers in the exporting country and consumers in the importing country both lose (i.e., receive lower and higher prices, respectively). Conversely, producers in the importing country and consumers in the exporting country win (i.e., receive higher and lower prices, respectively).”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“In the short run, consumers who purchase goods with a tariff might see higher prices if the tariff is not absorbed elsewhere. In the long run, the tariff might result in changes to the supply chain that result in higher prices but also create other economic opportunities in America (e.g. reshoring of domestic manufacturing).”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“The correct economist answer is ‘it depends.’ Tariffs drive a wedge between prices in the exporting country and in the importing country. It depends on the circumstances of particular markets and how much is reflected in higher prices in the importing country and reduced prices in the exporting country.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Both the exporting nation and the importing consumer pay some portion of the tariff depending on who has more flexibility to adjust to trade barrier. If exporting countries can easily switch to supplying other markets, they won’t have to ‘pay.’ If consumers can easily find cheap substitute goods, they won’t have to pay.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;Trump Threatens Tariffs on Deere&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        During a policy roundtable in Smithton, Penn., organized by the Protecting America Initiative last month, Trump made significant statements regarding John Deere and its plans to move some production to Mexico. 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/trump-threatens-200-tariff-if-deere-moves-manufacturing-mexico" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Trump threatened to impose a 200% tariff on John Deere products&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         if the company proceeds with its plan to relocate some of its manufacturing operations to Mexico.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Farm Journal asked economists the likely outcome if Trump did follow through with tariffs. Here’s what they said:&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-bd0000" name="image-bd0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/324e350/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/127e68e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1a9ea2a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c31a26b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8483b29/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag Economists Monthly Monitor 10-2024 - John Deere equipment prices - WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bb3d48c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e766a35/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/611b324/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8483b29/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8483b29/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fd9%2F95%2F7e0c500442a6b59c5063c46a89d1%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-10-2024-john-deere-equipment-prices-web.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;b&gt;Your Next Read: &lt;/b&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/soybeans/u-s-agriculture-faces-growing-trade-deficit-usda-projects-record-ag-trade-def" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;U.S. Agriculture Faces Growing Trade Deficit, USDA Projects a Record Ag Trade Deficit in 2024&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:42:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/presidential-poll-results-how-farmers-and-economists-view-candidates-impact-agriculture</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4e03154/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x860+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F6e%2Fda%2F45e9cba44bfd9fdecedf3970e826%2Fpoll-results-presidential-candidates.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2023 And 2024 Will Go Down As The Largest Drop In Net Farm Income Ever</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/ugly-truth-2023-and-2024-will-go-down-two-largest-declines-net-farm-income-ever</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        There’s a silent stress growing across rural America. Farmers are focused on growing this year’s crop, hoping to outyield the low commodity prices. They’re keeping their head down and trudging through the day-to-day grind, but their angst can’t be ignored. Many farmers say they have a gut feeling 2024 will go down as the worst financial year they’ve ever had. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reality is glaring. USDA’s net farm income forecast for 2024 is a $43 billion drop from 2023 to $116.1 billion. That is a 25.5% decline in just one year. What makes it even more jarring is that follows the 2023 net farm income figure, which saw a 16% drop from 2022. If USDA’s forecast holds true, that will mark the most significant two-year farm income decline in U.S. history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The $90-billion drop over a two-year period is certainly the largest dollar value drop, adjusted for inflation, that we’ve seen in our history,” says Ben Brown, an agricultural economist with the University of Missouri. “It exceeds the previous record set in the mid-1970s. When it comes to percentage changes, we’ve seen larger percentage changes. But you’d have to go all the way back to the Great Depression era and the early 1930s to find bigger percentage declines.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="HtmlModule"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="html-embed-module-780000" name="html-embed-module-780000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    &lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zdchB6oafnI?si=lqyvA-kWgJTgdSjC" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;


    
        &lt;br&gt;However, 2023 may end up being even worse than what USDA currently has projected. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As USDA showed in the June Grain Stocks report, farmers are still holding onto a lot of their 2023 crop. In fact, USDA thinks on-farm storage is the highest since the 1980s. The reason: as commodity prices fall, farmers are reluctant to sell below the cost of production. That means USDA’s 2023 net farm income forecast may be even worse than what it is today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The big change I think we could see in an update would be the 2023 farm income numbers revised lower even from where they were,” says Brown.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Farmers aren’t just caught trying to market the current crop growing in fields today. Many still have last year’s crop sitting in bins. And corn and soybean prices are seeing another bloodbath to close out July.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Farmers Hope to Outyield Low Prices&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wading through a sea of soybeans, Arkansas farmer Becton Bell stares at one of his best crops ever, and he’s trying to focus on that positive right now. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We’ve had a pleasant year,” says Bell, who farms in Mississippi County, Ark. “Rains have been, for the most part, pretty timely.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reality for Bell and other farmers marketing 2024 crops currently is they face, potentially, deep economic losses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It’s been the markets, to be honest,” says Bell, when asked what his biggest challenge is this year. “There just hasn’t been a good marketing opportunity. It’s kind of like catching a falling knife, trying to market soybeans and corn. Nobody wants to catch that falling knife.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In his area of Arkansas, farmers rely on irrigation. And even though he’s irrigated some this season, timely rains have helped reduce the need to irrigate as much as usual.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We’ve probably irrigated half of what we normally do so, you know, it could very easily mean several hundred-thousand-dollar savings to our bottom line,” he says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="arkansas-crop-conditions-07-31-24" name="arkansas-crop-conditions-07-31-24"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement-player"&gt;&lt;bsp-brightcove-player data-video-player class="BrightcoveVideoPlayer"
    data-account="5176256085001"
    data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss"
    data-video-id="6359685737112"
    data-video-title="Arkansas Crop Conditions 07/31/24"
    
    &gt;

    &lt;video class="video-js" id="BrightcoveVideoPlayer-6359685737112" data-video-id="6359685737112" data-account="5176256085001" data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss" data-embed="default" controls  &gt;&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/bsp-brightcove-player&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;br&gt;Those doses of rain and short spurts of heat in northeast Arkansas mean growing conditions there have been like a greenhouse this year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It’s just almost scary to say this, but rains have been almost perfect as far as our timing goes,” says Bell. “Our corn crop looks like it could be one of our best corn crops we ever had, as does our soybean crop. So, I’m optimistic about the crops.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While input costs remain relatively high, he’s hopeful the extra bushels will help soften the blow of lower commodity prices, but nerves are still high. And that’s the case for not just Bell, but many other farmers this year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stress in Farm Finances Already Showing Up&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Farm financial stress is already showing up in the form of liquidity. One ag banker painted that dismal picture for Congress when he testified about the state of the farm economy on Capitol Hill earlier this week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“With rising input costs and lower commodity prices, farmers and ranchers have worked through the liquidity and working capital they built up over the past few years at a more rapid rate than anticipated. Now they’re beginning to leverage equity through refinancing debt,” says Tony Hotchkiss, chairman of the Ag and Rural Bankers Committee for the American Bankers Association. “This has made ag bankers feel like they are looking over the cliff when it comes to the farm economy.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ag industries are struggling as well. Just last week, Deere announced more employee layoffs, citing the severe headwinds in the ag economy. Farm Journal Washington Correspondent Jim Wiesmeyer says other agribusinesses are feeling the pain of similar costs of production and labor issues faced by farmers and ranchers, as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are some silver linings, Wiesemeyer reports. He says while ADM’s earnings for the second quarter were somber, Juan Luciano, chairman of the board and CEO, expressed confidence in the company’s full-year expectations, citing anticipated improvements in crush and ethanol operations. So, despite all the obvious gloom in ag, Wiesemeyer says it’s not all doom.&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/ugly-truth-2023-and-2024-will-go-down-two-largest-declines-net-farm-income-ever</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3f49f52/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x860+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F31%2Ff0%2Fc8219444421e883bb3afeacf2aeb%2Fnet-cash-farm-income.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Do You Know When Agriculture Is In A Recession?</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/how-do-you-know-when-agriculture-recession</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Agriculture can sometimes act as a buffer during broader economic recessions, as demand for essential food items tends to remain relatively stable. However, when multiple indicators align, it can signal a recession in the agricultural sector.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to analysts and economists, pay particular attention to the following:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ol start="1"&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Declining farm income.&lt;/b&gt; A significant drop in net farm income is a major sign. For example, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/how-low-will-we-go-usda-expected-cut-their-2024-net-farm-income" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;USDA forecasts another major decline&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         in farm income for 2024, on top of the big decline in 2023. That would be the largest ever two-year decline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sharply declining commodity prices.&lt;/b&gt; Weak prices for major crops and livestock products can indicate economic trouble for farmers. Crop prices have seen sharply declining prices, with the meat sector showing continued strength.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Elevated input prices costs.&lt;/b&gt; When input costs such as fertilizer, fuel and labor remain elevated while commodity prices fall, it squeezes farm profitability.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reduced agricultural exports.&lt;/b&gt; Slowing exports and a growing trade deficit in agriculture can signal economic challenges. USDA forecasts the third straight year of a 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/first-forecast-fy-2025-usda-projects-bulging-ag-trade-deficit-top-42-billion" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;U.S. ag trade deficit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , with the fiscal year 2025 at $42.5 billion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Debt vs. cash flow.&lt;/b&gt; Increasing farm debt relative to cash flow combined with higher borrowing costs due to interest rate increases can strain farm finances.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Weakening credit conditions.&lt;/b&gt; Lower repayment rates on farm loans and increased loan renewals/extensions can indicate financial stress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Declining demand for agricultural products.&lt;/b&gt; Reduced consumer spending on discretionary food items during broader economic recessions can impact certain agricultural sectors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Falling farmland values.&lt;/b&gt; Higher interest rates and lower farm profitability can lead to 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/farmland/changes-expect-farmland-market-fall" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;downward pressure on land prices&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        .&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Increased inventory levels.&lt;/b&gt; Growing stockpiles of crops and livestock products can spur further price declines.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Widespread financial stress.&lt;/b&gt; When a large number of farmers across different regions and commodity sectors experience financial difficulties simultaneously it can point to an industry-wide recession.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;b&gt;Your Next Read: &lt;/b&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/corn/more-50-ag-economists-now-think-us-ag-economy-already-recession" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;More Than 50% of Ag Economists Now Think the U.S. Ag Economy is Already In a Recession&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 22:03:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/how-do-you-know-when-agriculture-recession</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d47d803/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x860+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F1a%2Fb1%2Fee2441cf414cba344f3bfeabd0ca%2Ffarm-recession.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Meat Industry Urges Harris to Stop Using Meat As a Scapegoat And Distraction For Root Cause of Inflation</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/meat-industry-urges-administration-stop-using-meat-scapegoat-and-distraction-root-cause-i</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Today in Raleigh, North Carolina, Vice President Kamala Harris is expected to propose several economic measures aimed at addressing key voter concerns such as housing and grocery costs. Her proposals include:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Federal ban on price gouging: &lt;/b&gt;Harris plans to introduce a federal ban on price gouging in the food and grocery sectors, particularly targeting the meat processing industry, which she claims is highly consolidated and contributes to rising grocery prices. Harris has declined to detail what her administration would consider “excessive” price gouging and how they would go about targeting companies, appearing to leave much of those decisions to FTC discretion. Calling out companies for running up the price of some food products polls well with swing-state voters and is supported by progressive groups. Several factors have made grocery prices volatile since the pandemic, including supply chain disruptions and a big shift in consumer buying patterns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Price controls:&lt;/b&gt; The vice president also envisions new price controls on groceries, and expanding limits on out-of-pocket prescription drug prices to all Americans. Harris says she would push the government to negotiate additional drug savings faster, and cap the monthly cost of insulin at $35 for all Americans. Jason Furman, a Harvard economist who worked in the Obama administration, warned about potential market disruptions that such pricing policies could unleash. If prices don’t rise as demand grows, companies might be less inclined to increase supplies. “This not sensible policy and I think the biggest hope is that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and no reality,” he told the &lt;i&gt;New York Times&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Housing initiatives:&lt;/b&gt; She will propose tax incentives to facilitate the creation of 3 million new housing units over four years, surpassing previous initiatives. This includes unspecified tax advantages for builders focusing on entry-level buyers and affordable rental properties, as well as a $40 billion fund to assist local governments in financing housing developments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Down payment assistance:&lt;/b&gt; Harris is set to propose providing up to $25,000 in down payment support for first-time homebuyers, a plan that her campaign suggests could benefit over 4 million buyers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;• Tax relief on tips:&lt;/b&gt; Harris will advocate for eliminating federal taxes on tips, a proposal also supported by former President Donald Trump.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Tax credits:&lt;/b&gt; Harris’ plan would expand the child tax credit to $3,600 from $2,000 per dependent, with a $6,000 credit for newborns. She also proposes expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit for childless low-wage workers and increasing subsidies for those who purchase insurance on federal health exchanges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;These proposals are part of her broader economic agenda&lt;/b&gt; aimed at reducing costs for consumers and addressing inflationary pressures, which remain a significant concern for voters despite a generally strong economic performance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Of note:&lt;/b&gt; Harris’ price-gouging initiatives are unlikely to pass in Congress due to insufficient support. Her plan mirrors stalled legislation from Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Bob Casey (D-Pa.), and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), which has faced strong opposition from Republicans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Meat Industry Speaks Out&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The meat industry has strongly rejected Harris’ pointing to meat prices at the center of food inflation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It’s time for this administration to stop using the meat and poultry industry as a scapegoat and a distraction for the root causes of inflation and the significant challenges facing our economy,” National Chicken Council Interim President Gary Kushner said in a statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Meat Institute issued the following statement&lt;/b&gt; from Meat Institute President and CEO, Julie Anna Potts, in response to news reporting of a Harris Campaign proposal to place a federal ban on price gouging:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Consumers have been impacted by high prices due to inflation on everything from services to rent to automobiles, not just at the grocery store. A federal ban on price gouging does not address the real causes of inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The Harris campaign rhetoric unfairly targets the meat and poultry industry and does not match the facts. Food prices continue to come down from the highs of the pandemic. Prices for meat are based on supply and demand. Avian Influenza, a shortage of beef cattle and high input prices like energy and labor are all factors that determine prices at the meat case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Prices that livestock producers receive for their animals are also heavily influenced by supply and demand. Prices for cattle producers especially are at record highs, surpassing the 2014-2015 previous record highs. Today, well into 2024, cattle prices remain at record levels because the US has the lowest cattle inventory since Harry Truman was President.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Major meat companies have reported losses during the Biden-Harris Administration, with some closing facilities and laying off workers.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;— Donald Trump held a press conference yesterday where he labeled Harris’ plan as “communist”&lt;/b&gt; and warned efforts to control grocery prices would lead to “food shortages, rationing, hunger, dramatically more inflation.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;— Do food price controls work?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt; While food price controls can offer short-term benefits in specific situations, such as during acute supply disruptions, they are generally seen as economically unsound in the long term. They tend to create more problems than they solve by distorting market mechanisms and leading to shortages. Most economists recommend targeted income support and structural economic policies as more effective alternatives for addressing food price inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;— The Biden administration has previously raised concerns about potential price gouging in the food industry,&lt;/b&gt; particularly in the context of rising grocery prices. However, these charges have not been proven. Vice President Kamala Harris has been vocal about the issue, emphasizing the role of corporate price gouging in driving up grocery costs, particularly in the meat industry, which she claims has seen significant price increases. The administration has proposed measures to address these concerns, including advocating for a federal ban on corporate price gouging. This proposal aims to hold large corporations accountable for maintaining high prices on essential goods. Despite these claims, the economic community remains divided on the issue. Many economists argue that the primary drivers of recent price increases are supply chain disruptions, changes in consumer behavior, and increased demand due to government stimulus measures, rather than corporate practices. Some economists have criticized the administration’s focus on price gouging as a political maneuver rather than a substantive economic policy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;— Fed study: Corporate price gouging not a significant factor in U.S. inflation surge.&lt;/b&gt; Earlier this year, a study published by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco concluded that corporate price gouging has not been a significant factor in the recent surge of U.S. inflation. The study, led by researchers Sylvain Leduc, Huiyu Li, and Zheng Liu, found that while there were spikes in markups for specific sectors like motor vehicles and petroleum products, the overall markups for U.S. goods and services have remained relatively stable. This suggests that rising corporate profits and price increases were not the primary drivers of inflation during the post-pandemic recovery.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;The study contradicts the narrative that corporate greed, often referred to as “greedflation,” is a major cause of inflation.&lt;/b&gt; Instead, it attributes the inflationary pressures to supply chain disruptions, a decrease in labor supply, and a surge in consumer demand during the recovery period. The easing of inflation is credited to improvements in supply chains, increased immigration, and reduced demand due to higher borrowing costs as the Federal Reserve raised interest rates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;— Several recent U.S. presidents have attempted to implement price controls, with varying degrees of success and consequences.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Richard Nixon:&lt;/b&gt; Wage and Price Controls (1971-1973): President Richard Nixon is perhaps the most famous for implementing wage and price controls in the early 1970s. In August 1971, Nixon imposed a 90-day freeze on wages and prices to combat inflation, which was part of a broader economic strategy that included taking the U.S. off the gold standard. These controls were initially popular and appeared to be effective in curbing inflation temporarily. However, once the controls were lifted, inflation surged again, leading to economic distortions and shortages. The controls were largely seen as a failure in the long term, as they did not address the underlying causes of inflation and led to economic inefficiencies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;• Gerald Ford:&lt;/b&gt; President Gerald Ford did not implement new price controls during his administration. Instead, he focused on ending existing controls. In response to the economic issues of the mid-1970s, Ford proposed ending price controls on domestic oil as part of his broader energy policy. This was part of a compromise with Congress, which allowed for a gradual phasing out of these controls over a forty-month period. Ford believed that removing price controls would stimulate domestic oil production and align with his free-market philosophy. However, this decision was contentious, with Democrats worried about potential long-term price increases and conservative Republicans dissatisfied with the compromise. Ultimately, Ford’s administration focused more on tax and spending policies, such as the “Whip Inflation Now” (WIN) campaign, which aimed to combat inflation through voluntary measures rather than mandatory controls.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Jimmy Carter:&lt;/b&gt; President Jimmy Carter, facing high inflation, introduced a program of voluntary wage and price controls in 1978. This approach was part of a broader anti-inflation strategy that included government restraint and efforts to reduce the federal deficit. The voluntary nature of the controls, however, led to skepticism about their effectiveness. Critics argued that voluntary controls were insufficient to curb inflation, which continued to rise during Carter’s presidency. In addition to voluntary controls, Carter also dealt with energy price controls. In response to the energy crisis and rising oil prices, he gradually deregulated oil prices starting in 1979, while also proposing a windfall profits tax to address public concerns about oil company profits. Despite these efforts, inflation remained a significant issue throughout Carter’s term, contributing to economic instability and public dissatisfaction.
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:09:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/meat-industry-urges-administration-stop-using-meat-scapegoat-and-distraction-root-cause-i</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c7e212b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/520x293+0+0/resize/1440x811!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2021-02%2Fgrocery-store-steaks.gif" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Consumer Prices Rose Moderately in July; Annual Increase Slows to Below 3%</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/u-s-consumer-prices-rose-moderately-july-annual-increase-slows-below-3</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        U.S. consumer prices rose moderately in July and the annual increase in inflation slowed to below 3% for the first time since early 2021, further strengthening expectations the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates next month. &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;The report from the Labor Department on Wednesday added to a mild increase in producer prices in July in suggesting that inflation was firmly back on a downward trend. That should allow the U.S. central bank to focus more on the labor market amid growing concerns of a sharp slowdown. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The relay race to Fed cuts is on,” said Lindsay Rosner, head of multi-sector fixed income at Goldman Sachs Asset Management. “The Fed is on track to cut some amount in September, and we’ve got two more legs of this race to go.” &lt;br&gt;The consumer price index increased 0.2% last month after falling 0.1% in June, the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics said. The rise was in line with economists’ expectations. A 0.4% increase in shelter, which includes rents,accounted for nearly 90% of the rose in the CPI. Shelter costs increased 0.2% in June. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Food prices gained 0.2%, matching June’s rise. Gasoline prices were unchanged after falling for two straight months. In the 12 months through July, the CPI increased 2.9%. That was the first sub-3% reading and smallest gain since March 2021. Consumer prices advanced 3.0% on a year-on-year basis in June. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Annual consumer price growth has moderated considerably from a peak of 9.1% in June 2022 as higher borrowing costs cool demand. While still elevated, inflation is moving towards the Fed’s 2% target. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The odds of a half-percentage-point rate cut at the Fed’s Sept. 17-18 policy meeting are around 59%, with the remainder of bets on a quarter-percentage-point drop, according to CME Group’s FedWatch tool. The rate pricing mostly reflects the jump in the unemployment rate to near a three-year high of 4.3% in July. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economists, however, argue the labor market would have to deteriorate considerably for the central bank to deliver a 50-basis-point reduction in borrowing costs. The fourth straight monthly increase in the jobless rate was mostly driven by an immigration-induced rise in labor supply rather than layoffs. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Fed has maintained its benchmark overnight interest rate in the current 5.25%-5.50% range for more than a year, having raised it by 525 basis points in 2022 and 2023. Excluding the volatile food and energy components, the CPI rose 0.2% in July after rising 0.1% in June. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the 12 months through July, the core CPI advanced 3.2%. That was the smallest year-on-year increase since April 2021 and followed a 3.3% gain in June. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; “Unless the global economy experiences another shock, the Fed will most likely cut rates by a quarter percent in September,” said Jeffrey Roach, chief economist at LPL Financial. “The probability of the Fed cutting by a half percent is still elevated since investors are still somewhat skittish from recent events.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Paul Simao) 
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 16:57:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/u-s-consumer-prices-rose-moderately-july-annual-increase-slows-below-3</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3688b7f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1201x860+0+0/resize/1440x1031!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2024-05%2FGrocery%20diversity.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>There Are New, Early Signs of Ag Sector Financial Pressure</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/there-are-new-early-signs-ag-sector-financial-pressure</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.kansascityfed.org/agriculture/ag-credit-survey/early-signs-of-financial-pressure/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Agricultural credit conditions in the Tenth Federal Reserve District tightened&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         in the second quarter of 2024&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;due to declining farm income, lower crop prices, and high production costs. Farm incomes continued to weaken, particularly in crop-heavy states like Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska, while cattle prices provided some support. Farm borrower liquidity declined, and loan demand increased sharply, but repayment rates fell, indicating growing financial pressure on farmers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;b&gt; Farm income was lower in all states, but the retraction remained especially pronounced in areas more impacted by low crop prices.&lt;/b&gt; The index of farm income was lower in Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska, where crops make up a larger share of farm revenues (&lt;i&gt;Chart 2&lt;/i&gt;). After strengthening last quarter, farm income in the Mountain States and Oklahoma declined in the second quarter as 30% of lenders in those states reported lower farm income than a year ago.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-620000" name="image-620000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1075" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/eb7d782/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/568x424!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/76631ba/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/768x573!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1ff77cf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/1024x764!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/f0d178a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/1440x1075!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1075" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/2c79fcb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/1440x1075!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="FI_State.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/033ea86/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/568x424!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d41375d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/768x573!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/21c96de/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/1024x764!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/2c79fcb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/1440x1075!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1075" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/2c79fcb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1860x1388+0+0/resize/1440x1075!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F99%2Fe6%2F410e3c8c4a0bb9f3b1b2352da056%2Ffi-state.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;Farm income by state&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;b&gt;Despite these challenges, agricultural credit stress remained limited, though signs of financial strain are emerging.&lt;/b&gt; Interest rates on farm loans stayed relatively high, and farmland values grew more slowly, with ranchland values showing relative strength. Lenders expect land values to stabilize, with some anticipating further declines in cropland values and increases in ranchland values. Overall, the agricultural sector is experiencing modest financial deterioration amid ongoing economic pressures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;table class="MsoTableGrid" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="margin-left:13.25pt;border-collapse:collapse;border:none;mso-border-alt:
 solid windowtext .5pt;mso-yfti-tbllook:1184;mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr style="mso-yfti-irow:0;mso-yfti-firstrow:yes;mso-yfti-lastrow:yes"&gt;&lt;td colspan="1" rowspan="1" width="630" valign="top" style="width:472.5pt;border:solid #0070C0 3.0pt;
  padding:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Banker Comments Q2 2024&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Beef producers have experienced good margins over the last 12-18 months, but increasing replacement costs and interest costs will reduce margins moving forward.”&lt;/i&gt;– Kansas&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“&lt;i&gt;Lower grain prices and continued drought are causing stress.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Kansas&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Inflation has increased family living expenses for our producers. Lower crop prices compared to a year ago is also worrisome to farmers in the area but continued high livestock prices have helped our cattle producers.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Kansas&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Inflation is having a substantial effect on family living. Equipment upgrades and new purchases are a rare conversation with stressed cash flows.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Missouri&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“We expect profit margins to be reduced in the row crop sector while we should see significant improvement in profit margins in the cattle sector.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Missouri&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“The cattle market has provided much needed profit for cattle producers, but expansion and replacements have a lot of risk for borrower and lenders if a correction is to take place in the near future.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Missouri&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“We are seeing quite a few of our farm lines of credit approaching their max already, which would be a few months earlier than normal.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Nebraska&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Inflation is keeping household spending higher, liquidity took a hit and we have seen some refinancing needed against land, but land prices are still high even with higher interest rates.”–&lt;/i&gt; &lt;b&gt;Nebraska&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Interest rates and commodity prices and primary concerns in our area.”&lt;/i&gt;– &lt;b&gt;Nebraska&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“If cattle prices maintain, cattle producers will be okay until stockers are purchased, but if cattle prices deteriorate, it could be ugly. Crop farmers with low prices are hurting and yields were all over the spectrum.”&lt;/i&gt; – &lt;b&gt;Oklahoma&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Cost of living is increasing significantly, and equipment and parts cost are increasing significantly.”&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;Oklahoma&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Higher rates are straining farmers cash flow and ability to operate with increasing input costs.”&lt;/i&gt; - &lt;b&gt;Oklahoma&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/there-are-new-early-signs-ag-sector-financial-pressure</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b6708e8/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-04%2FWeather-storm%20clouds%20-Lindsey%20Pound.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How Agriculture Could Be Impacted by Any U.S. Recession</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/how-agriculture-could-be-impacted-any-u-s-recession</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Talk of a recession in the U.S. is making headlines. A U.S. recession can have varied impacts on the ag sector, influenced by factors such as commodity prices, input costs, and consumer demand. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some key points to consider:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Impact on farm income and commodity prices&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 1. Decline in farm income:&lt;/b&gt; Farm income is expected to decrease significantly, with projections indicating a decline of $43.1 billion in 2024 compared to 2023. This decline is attributed to lower commodity prices and higher production expenses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 2. Commodity price fluctuations:&lt;/b&gt; Recessions often lead to decreased demand for certain agricultural products, particularly those considered discretionary, such as cotton, dairy, specialty meat products and vegetables (&lt;i&gt;more on this below&lt;/i&gt;). This can result in lower prices for these commodities, affecting farmers’ revenues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 3. Input costs:&lt;/b&gt; Despite potential reductions in fuel prices, other production costs, such as labor, marketing, and transportation, are expected to rise. This increase in expenses can further squeeze farm profitability.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Consumer demand and market stability&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 1. Stable demand for essentials:&lt;/b&gt; The demand for essential food items tends to remain stable during recessions, as consumers still need to purchase basic food products. This can provide some stability to the agriculture sector, particularly for staple crops like corn and soybeans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 2. Shifts in consumer spending:&lt;/b&gt; While overall food demand remains stable, there may be shifts in consumer spending patterns, such as reduced spending on higher-end food products and dining out, which can impact certain segments of the agriculture market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Financial and economic considerations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 1. Credit and loan challenges:&lt;/b&gt; With declining farm incomes and high input costs, farmers may face difficulties in meeting loan obligations, leading to increased credit risk for agricultural lenders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 2. Impact on rural economies:&lt;/b&gt; Reduced farm income can have a ripple effect on rural economies that depend on agricultural spending. This can lead to economic challenges for businesses in these communities, potentially resulting in business closures and job losses.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 3. Risk management:&lt;/b&gt; Farmers may need to adopt risk management strategies such as crop insurance or revenue protection programs to mitigate the impact of lower commodity prices on their income.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; During a recession, certain ag commodities are more vulnerable&lt;/b&gt; due to changes in consumer spending and economic conditions. Here are the commodities that in the past have been most susceptible:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Vulnerable commodities&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 1. Cotton:&lt;/b&gt; Cotton is particularly vulnerable during a recession because it is considered a discretionary item. Consumers tend to cut back on non-essential purchases, which affects the demand for cotton and cotton-related products. As a result, cotton prices often decline during economic downturns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 2. Specialized meat and vegetables:&lt;/b&gt; Niche products, such as specialized meat products and high-end vegetables, also face greater recessionary pressures. These items are often sold at higher prices and are more likely to be purchased when consumers have disposable income. During a recession, consumers may opt for more affordable alternatives, reducing demand for these specialized products.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; 3. Dairy:&lt;/b&gt; Dairy farms are among those that could experience financial stress if farm income declines further. The dairy sector’s vulnerability is linked to its reliance on stable commodity prices and the ability to manage production costs effectively.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Of note:&lt;/b&gt; Commodities tied to discretionary spending are more vulnerable to the impacts of a recession.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Resilient commodities&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conversely, some commodities are less affected by recessions due to their status as staple goods:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Poultry, eggs, wheat, and peanuts:&lt;/b&gt; These commodities are considered staples and tend to maintain stable demand even during economic downturns. As essential food items, they are less likely to experience significant drops in demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bottom line:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Overall, while the ag sector can act as a buffer during economic downturns due to stable demand for essential products, it is not immune to the broader economic challenges posed by a recession. Farmers and agribusinesses may need to navigate these challenges through strategic planning and risk management. This is why Title I of the farm bill is so important and why some lawmakers stress the current safety net will prove woefully short of helping farmers in any significant price downturn.
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 17:44:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/how-agriculture-could-be-impacted-any-u-s-recession</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/15638f1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/640x480+0+0/resize/1440x1080!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Ffarm.png" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top Fed Officials Say They Are Getting 'Closer' to Cutting Interest Rates</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/top-fed-officials-say-they-are-getting-closer-cutting-interest-rates</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Top Federal Reserve officials said on Wednesday the U.S. central bank is “closer” to cutting interest rates given inflation’s improved trajectory and a labor market in better balance, remarks that set the stage for a first reduction in borrowing costs in September. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fed Governor Christopher Waller and New York Fed President John Williams both noted the shortening horizon toward looser monetary policy, with Waller highlighting it in a speech at the Kansas City Fed and Williams voicing it in a Wall Street Journal interview.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Separately, Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin said he is “very encouraged” that declines in inflation had begun to broaden. “I’d like to see that continue,” he told a business group in Maryland.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/fed-cutting-interest-rates-now-imminent" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related News: Is the Fed Cutting Interest Rates Now Imminent?&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The remarks are the latest in a rush this week of commentary from top U.S. central bank officials - including Fed Chair Jerome Powell - to note their increased confidence that the disinflationary trend that began last year is continuing, despite a short-lived bump in inflation earlier this year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Price pressures appear to be easing across the board, the Fed officials said, with goods prices falling, housing cost increases slowing, and more moderate wage growth feeding into a long-awaited easing of price increases in the services sector. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Williams and Waller appeared to rule out a rate cut at the Fed’s July 30-31 policy meeting, a view reflected in financial markets that are now pricing the probability of a move at that meeting at less than 5%. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Waller listed September through December as the potential time frame when conditions for a rate cut could be right, omitting July. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/fed-running-out-reasons-not-cut-interest-rates-important-insights-powells" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related News: Is the Fed Running Out of Reasons to Not Cut Interest Rates?&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In his WSJ interview, Williams said, “We’re actually going to learn a lot between July and September. We’ll get two months of inflation data.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All three policymakers who spoke on Wednesday were “pointing to September” for a start to the policy easing, Karim Basta, chief economist at III Capital Management, wrote. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Financial markets agree, and on Wednesday kept bets the U.S. central bank, which has held its policy rate in the 5.25%-5.50% range for the past year, will cut borrowing costs again in November and December, bringing the benchmark policy rate to the 4.50%-4.75% range by the end of 2024. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Waller, who in May had said he would need several more months of improved inflation data to convince him that rate cuts would be warranted, said data last week showing the first monthly drop in the consumer price index in four years “was the second month of very good news.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He laid out what he saw as three scenarios for how inflation may play out in the months ahead. The two most likely of those, Waller said, suggest inflation will continue to moderate toward the Fed’s 2% target in the months ahead, albeit in one scenario more rapidly and consistently than the other. The third and least likely possibility was for inflation to reaccelerate and keep rate cuts on hold. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, Waller said, “given that I believe the first two scenarios have the highest probability of occurring, I believe the time to lower the policy rate is drawing closer.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Williams, who is also vice chair of the central bank’s rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee, said: “I feel like the past three months - and I would include in June, based on what we’ve seen - seems to be getting us closer to a disinflationary trend that we’re looking for. I would like to see more data to gain further confidence inflation is moving sustainably towards our 2% goal. We’ve got a few good months now.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;‘SOFT LANDING’&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; More Fed policymakers have suggested they are getting increasingly comfortable that the pace of price increases is more firmly on track back down to 2%, after higher-than-expected readings earlier in the year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While inflation has eased notably from its high-water mark two years ago, progress has been lumpy with uneven contributions from important categories. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Tuesday, though, Fed Governor Adriana Kugler said she saw goods, services and now housing contributing to easing price pressures. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We’re seeing more progress on all three categories now,” Kugler told a National Association for Business Economics seminar. “I’m cautiously optimistic that we’re seeing progress and the type of progress that we need to get back to 2%.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the Fed’s preferred measure, inflation in May was running at a 2.6% annual rate, down from the 7.1% peak reached during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data for June is due on July 26. &lt;br&gt;Fed chief Powell on Monday also said that inflation readings over the second quarter of this year “add somewhat to confidence” on its downward path, suggesting a start of an easing cycle may not be far off. &lt;br&gt;The U.S. central bank “may well be able to achieve the soft landing” of bringing down inflation without triggering a painful recession and sharp rise in unemployment, Waller said on Wednesday. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But noting that the unemployment rate rose to 4.1% in June, Waller added, “there is more upside risk to unemployment than we have seen for a long time.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(With reporting by Harshita Meenaktshi and Lindsay Dunsmuir; Writing by Dan Burns and Ann Saphir; Editing by Andrew Heavens, Tomasz Janowski, Andrea Ricci and Paul Simao) 
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:42:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/top-fed-officials-say-they-are-getting-closer-cutting-interest-rates</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b723907/2147483647/strip/true/crop/650x474+0+0/resize/1440x1050!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2F2017-04%2Ffederal-reserve.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Reasons Behind the Painful Surge in Grocery Prices</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/reasons-behind-painful-surge-grocery-prices</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        The post-Covid surge in grocery prices has been a noticeable and financially painful part of the rising U.S. cost of living. Shoppers couldn’t miss the sharp price increases, such as the doubling cost of a can of tomatoes or the significant rise in beef prices. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economist Thomas Klitgaard from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2024/07/what-was-up-with-grocery-prices/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;analyzed the causes of this increase&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . Here are the key findings:&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-380000" name="image-380000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1250" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1c63ac0/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/568x493!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c48ebdd/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/768x667!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/40282db/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/1024x889!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ec4a819/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/1440x1250!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1250" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a941630/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/1440x1250!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="FoodPrices.png" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/adc1455/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/568x493!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/007450f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/768x667!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/84568cf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/1024x889!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a941630/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/1440x1250!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png 1440w" width="1440" height="1250" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a941630/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x434+0+0/resize/1440x1250!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fc2%2Fcb%2F3d86afc346beb3ac90274bff2c18%2Ffoodprices.png" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;Food prices&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Liberty Street Economics)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;b&gt; Stable prices before pandemic:&lt;/b&gt; The consumer price index (CPI) for food-at-home was stable for the five years prior to the pandemic, indicating little change in grocery bills from 2014 to 2019.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Sharp increases during pandemic:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;• 2020: Prices rose by 4%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;• 2021: Prices increased by 6%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;• 2022: Prices jumped by 12%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;Overall, the food-at-home index increased by 25% from Q4 2019 to Q1 2023.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Key components driving price increases:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Commodity Prices:&lt;/b&gt; The underlying price of commodities, especially grains, saw significant increases. This rise cascaded down to other food items like beef, pork, poultry, eggs, and dairy products.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Wages:&lt;/b&gt; The wage bill at supermarkets rose substantially, contributing to higher grocery prices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; Minor Impact:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; • Price gouging:&lt;/b&gt; Klitgaard’s analysis suggests that price gouging by companies was not a significant factor in the price increases.&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-450000" name="image-450000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1302" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/55d9d66/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/568x514!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1d6addc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/768x694!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8b742c5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/1024x926!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/5b7305d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/1440x1302!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1302" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a1f29e3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/1440x1302!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Wages.png" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/f596daa/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/568x514!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8190acf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/768x694!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/5818df2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/1024x926!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a1f29e3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/1440x1302!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png 1440w" width="1440" height="1302" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a1f29e3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/500x452+0+0/resize/1440x1302!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F7f%2F1b%2Ff6721a0b4006add9e692326dc86a%2Fwages.png" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;Wages &lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Liberty Street Economics )&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;b&gt; Bottom line:&lt;/b&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The surge in grocery prices was driven mainly by substantial increases in commodity prices and supermarket wages, rather than price gouging. The stability of grocery prices before the pandemic underscores the dramatic impact of these factors during the early 2020s. While grain prices have slumped since 2022, the wage bill keeps going up — with average hourly earnings up 6% in May from a year before. And Klitgaard warns that may bode ill for shoppers going forward. “An open question is whether grocery inflation can stay as moderate as it has been since early 2023 with grocery worker wage inflation still elevated,” he wrote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; 
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 15:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/reasons-behind-painful-surge-grocery-prices</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7f3dab1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/5833x3888+0+0/resize/1440x960!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2Fb3%2F69%2Fe53ce9ca4385ab3b2604fd285b75%2F2022-08-19t204537z-85837196-rc2uzv94xiyw-rtrmadp-3-usa-inflation.JPG" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Fed Running Out of Reasons to Not Cut Interest Rates? Important Insights From Powell's Testimony Today</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/fed-running-out-reasons-not-cut-interest-rates-important-insights-powells-testimony-today</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s testimony before the Senate Banking Committee provided several key insights into the current economic landscape and potential future monetary policy actions. Here are the main highlights:&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cooling job market and economic slowdown.&lt;/b&gt; Powell noted a noticeable cooling in the job market, with the unemployment rate rising to 4.1% for the third consecutive month. Despite this, hiring remains solid, indicating a slowdown rather than a halt in economic activity. He also mentioned a general deceleration in economic growth following a period of robust expansion last year.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Inflation and interest rates.&lt;/b&gt; Powell emphasized that while significant progress has been made in controlling inflation, it remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target. This persistent inflation, coupled with the slowing job market, has led to discussions about the potential for interest rate cuts soon. Powell’s testimony suggested a shift from the Fed’s previous focus on combating inflation to a more balanced approach that also considers economic growth and employment.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Potential rate cuts&lt;/b&gt;. Market participants and economists are anticipating a possible interest rate cut at the Federal Reserve’s Sept. 17-18 meeting. Powell’s remarks have bolstered these expectations, with many interpreting his statements as a signal that the Fed is open to adjusting rates to support the economy. Democratic senators, including Elizabeth Warren (Mass.), have been vocal in urging for rate cuts, aligning with market sentiments.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Political implications&lt;/b&gt;. The testimony comes at a politically sensitive time, with the presidential campaign season underway. Voters’ dissatisfaction with high prices has put additional pressure on the Federal Reserve’s decisions. Powell’s cautious approach aims to balance economic needs without appearing to influence political outcomes. His emphasis on avoiding delayed policy adjustments that could harm economic activity and employment was well-received by the markets.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Market impact&lt;/b&gt;: Markets want to believe the Fed will cut rates in September, so they are taking the basic remarks and now taking them as suddenly backing a rate cut in September. But the Dow is flat and CME Fed funds futures for September have a 70% probability of a rate cut. Yesterday that was 71%.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;“We continue to make decisions meeting by meeting. We know that reducing policy restraint too soon or too much could stall or even reverse the progress we have seen on inflation. At the same time, in light of the progress made both in lowering inflation and in cooling the labor market over the past two years, elevated inflation is not the only risk we face. Reducing policy restraint too late or too little could unduly weaken economic activity and employment,” Powell said during his testimony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Powell was asked when the Fed would cut rates. “I’m not going to be sending any signals about the timing of any further actions,” Powell said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Overall Outlook&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Powell highlighted the importance of monitoring economic indicators closely to avoid past mistakes of delayed responses to inflation. Thursday’s release of the Consumer Price Index for June is expected to show a slight decrease, further indicating a gradual moderation in inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The Committee has stated that we do not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the target range for the federal funds rate until we have gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2 percent. Incoming data for the first quarter of this year did not support such greater confidence. The most recent inflation readings, however, have shown some modest further progress, and more good data would strengthen our confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2%,” Powell said during his testimony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Powell’s testimony underscored a cautious optimism regarding inflation control, a recognition of a cooling job market, and a potential shift towards interest rate cuts to support the economy amidst evolving conditions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:20:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/fed-running-out-reasons-not-cut-interest-rates-important-insights-powells-testimony-today</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7f578d6/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x554+0+0/resize/1440x950!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-05%2F2023-05-03T192621Z_1_LYNXMPEJ420UR_RTROPTP_4_USA-ECONOMY-FED.JPG" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Land Values Have The Resilience Of a Dandelion</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/land-values-have-resilience-dandelion</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Though the ag economy is facing headwinds in interest rates, inflation and commodity prices, all classes of land across the country have gained in value, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.pappasmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-July-Land-Values-Release.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;according to Farmers National Company’s July report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Despite these negative pressures, the land market has remained relatively resilient but is showing signs of settling in general, including single-digit decreases in specific areas,” says Paul Schadegg, senior vice president of real estate operations at Farmers National Company.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="land-value-trends-the-first-half-of-2024" name="land-value-trends-the-first-half-of-2024"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement-player"&gt;&lt;bsp-brightcove-player data-video-player class="BrightcoveVideoPlayer"
    data-account="5176256085001"
    data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss"
    data-video-id="6357251205112"
    data-video-title="Land Value Trends the First Half of 2024"
    
    &gt;

    &lt;video class="video-js" id="BrightcoveVideoPlayer-6357251205112" data-video-id="6357251205112" data-account="5176256085001" data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss" data-embed="default" controls  &gt;&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/bsp-brightcove-player&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;br&gt;The decreases Schadegg references can be found in the eastern part of the country - in states such as Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio and Michigan. The overall stability of the market, however, is something Steve Bruere, president of Peoples Company, chalks up to simple supply and demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Commodity prices are softer and interest rates are higher, yet the farmland markets have been incredibly resilient. That’s because there’s still more capital out there that wants to own farmland than there is supply available,” Bruere says. “I talk to folks who say they want to buy farmland, but they want the market to cool off a little bit. I don’t know if the market will cool off to the degree they think that it should because there’s just not going to be supply.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Correlation Between Farmland and Inflation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another factor that might keep the land market from significantly settling is inflation, which, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr8IhyEEdHQ" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;based on data from Peoples Company&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , is shown to be very strongly correlated with farmland values.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-f50000" name="image-f50000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="835" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c455e30/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/568x329!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4a0ad9b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/768x445!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/057b91b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/1024x594!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1874774/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/1440x835!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="835" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ae6f7c3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/1440x835!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Peoples Company Farmland Values and Inflation" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/824f67c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/568x329!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/529d588/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/768x445!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/f64e576/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/1024x594!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ae6f7c3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/1440x835!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png 1440w" width="1440" height="835" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ae6f7c3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/400x232+0+0/resize/1440x835!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F8e%2F15%2F60ff445d43ac8e98b9c9004b2624%2Finflation-and-farmland-values-web.png" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;figcaption class="Figure-caption"&gt;This chart from Peoples Company combines data from USDA, BLS and TIAA Center for Farmland Research to show the connection between farmland values and inflation&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Peoples Company)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        “There’s a strong belief that we’re at the beginning stage, because of the fiscal policy in this country, where inflation is going to last quite a while and is going to get much more severe,” Bruere says. “If you believe that and that’s the camp you’re in, then you probably want to own farmland versus being in a fixed income like a T-bill.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="farmers-are-still-the-majority-of-farmland-buyers" name="farmers-are-still-the-majority-of-farmland-buyers"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement-player"&gt;&lt;bsp-brightcove-player data-video-player class="BrightcoveVideoPlayer"
    data-account="5176256085001"
    data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss"
    data-video-id="6357251412112"
    data-video-title="Farmers are Still the Majority of Farmland Buyers"
    
    &gt;

    &lt;video class="video-js" id="BrightcoveVideoPlayer-6357251412112" data-video-id="6357251412112" data-account="5176256085001" data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss" data-embed="default" controls  &gt;&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/bsp-brightcove-player&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;br&gt;But this doesn’t necessarily mean owners who are considering selling should wait for this environment to occur to get a higher price at auction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“If you’re considering selling, and you’re saying ‘OK, next year, the farmland market is going to be more vibrant than it is today, so I’m going to wait two or three years’, I think it’s going to take a little while for this interest rate and inflation environment to sort itself out,” Bruere says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;What To Watch&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;The timelines for inflation, interest rates and global conflict create a lot of unknowns in the market. As always, location and type of land plays an important role in overall land values.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We anticipate variations in land value changes across our regions in the U.S.,” Schadegg says. “Areas with strong supply/demand scenarios, an expansion of alternative land use projects and irrigation water concerns might experience more dramatic increases or decreases in values.”&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="the-land-market-is-at-a-tipping-point" name="the-land-market-is-at-a-tipping-point"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;div class="VideoEnhancement-player"&gt;&lt;bsp-brightcove-player data-video-player class="BrightcoveVideoPlayer"
    data-account="5176256085001"
    data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss"
    data-video-id="6357250914112"
    data-video-title="The Land Market is at a Tipping Point"
    
    &gt;

    &lt;video class="video-js" id="BrightcoveVideoPlayer-6357250914112" data-video-id="6357250914112" data-account="5176256085001" data-player="Lrn1aN3Ss" data-embed="default" controls  &gt;&lt;/video&gt;
&lt;/bsp-brightcove-player&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;br&gt;This sentiment is echoed by Bruere, who says he’s never been more bullish about land.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There’s some uncertainty around where farmland is going. But if you have a long-term timeline, there’s just never been a period where you buy a piece of farmland that it’s not going to be worth more at 10 years than the day you bought it.”&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 13:09:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/land-values-have-resilience-dandelion</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c5ac69f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/800x534+0+0/resize/1440x961!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F54%2F24%2F189cca6f4e4ca2f31792c20cbdfe%2Faerial-land-field-fields-corn-soybeans-lindsey-pound.png" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Fed Cutting Interest Rates Now Imminent?</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/fed-cutting-interest-rates-now-imminent</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        The Federal Reserve has four more chances this calendar year to cut interest rates. As it prepares for its next meeting at the end of July, the Fed is watching two data points: the new inflation data to be released later this week and the mixed jobs report released last week. Since July 2023, the Federal Reserve has kept its benchmark interest rate steady at a 23-year high of 5.25% to 5.5%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When and how many interest rate cuts continue to be a contentious point of debate. On the heels of the Federal Reserve deciding to leave interest rates unchanged during their June meeting, the June Ag Economists Monthly Monitor asked economists how many rate cuts, if any, we will see this year. Seventy three percent think the Fed will make one interest rate cut this year, 18% think it will be two cuts. That compares to the April survey when 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/will-we-see-hard-fall-or-soft-landing-its-million-dollar-question" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;44% of ag economists said they were becoming more pessimistic about interest rate cuts in 2024&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        .&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;When Will the Fed Cut Rates?&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        The Fed is not expected to cut rates at its upcoming FOMC meeting July 30 to Aug. 3. But after that, inflation data will be the key barometer. Investors currently see a 77.9% chance of a quarter-point rate cut by the Sept. 17 to 18 Fed meeting. There’s a 97.3% chance of at least one quarter-point cut by the final Fed meeting of the year on Dec. 17 to 18. However, some analysts believe the Fed could initiate its first rate cut in September if economic conditions continue to show signs of cooling. Others expect the first cut to come in the last quarter of 2024, possibly after the U.S. presidential election Nov. 5 (the FOMC meeting is Nov. 6 to 7).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has consistently stated the Fed is “data dependent,” which is particularly the case relative to inflation. That’s why the market will be watching the latest inflation data in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which will be released on Thursday, along with production inflation numbers out Friday. Powell has emphasized they need “greater confidence” that inflation is sustainably moving toward their 2% target before considering rate cuts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many economists and investors are now anticipating two quarter-point rate cuts before the end of 2024. But the Fed’s current “dot” map signals only one cut the remainder of this year. That assumption could of course change in the months ahead.&lt;br&gt;_______________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/subtle-change-notice-latest-fed-reserve-meeting" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Related News: The Subtle Change To Notice From The Latest Fed Reserve Meeting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;_______________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Factors influencing the decision, besides inflation, include recent data showing a cooling job market and moderating wage growth. The pace of economic growth and any signs of recession will be closely monitored.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; “If there’s an easing in labor market conditions that would encourage them, especially in front of the election, to cut rates, even if the inflation target is not met,” said 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/subtle-change-notice-latest-fed-reserve-meeting" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Vince Malanga, Pro Farmer economic consultant and president of LaSalle Economics, recently on AgriTalk.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         “If the unemployment situation is softening, especially three or four months before an election, I think you’re going to start to hear some people yelling at the Fed that they’ve overdone it.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Labor Department’s June jobs report released Friday showed employers added 206,000 jobs, but concerns remain about the labor market. Despite a slight increase in the unemployment rate of 4.1% due to more people entering the work force, labor force participation among prime-age workers is at its highest point in over 20 years. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, job growth is slowing, with downward revisions for May and April totaling 111,000 fewer jobs. Nearly three-quarters of June’s new jobs were in government, healthcare and social assistance. While the report doesn’t indicate an imminent recession, it shows an increasing role of government spending in job creation.&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fed Officials Weigh In&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Farm Journal spoke to 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.chicagofed.org/utilities/about-us/office-of-the-president/office-of-the-president-home" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Austan Goolsbee, president and chief executive officer &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        of the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.chicagofed.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , during the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.iowafarmbureau.com/News/Economic-Summit" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Iowa Farm Bureau’s Economic Summit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         in June. With more work to do in order to get to the Fed’s target of 2%, he says the Fed is also watching the jobs market closely. Up until this point, Goolsbee has been impressed with the resilience of the general economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“If you look, for sure internationally, at the U.S. growth, we’ve grown a lot,” Goolsbee says. “We’re actually higher than where we would have been when people were making predictions of where the GDP would be at this point before they had ever heard of COVID. We’re actually above where they were predicting we would be. We’re the only economy where that’s true. I’ve been very impressed with that resilience.”&lt;br&gt;_______________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/us-ag-economy-heading-toward-recession-one-one-president-chicago" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Related News: Is the U.S. Ag Economy Heading Toward a Recession? A One-on-One with the President of the Chicago Fed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;_______________________________________________________________&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Goolsbee says if inflation data continues to come in lower, and the jobs growth posts strong gains, then the Fed could cut rates to more normal levels. But until then, Goolsbee insists the Federal Reserve won’t budge on interest rates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;John Williams, Federal Reserve Bank of New York president, stated that although inflation has recently decreased toward the Fed’s 2% target, reaching the goal will take more time. Currently, inflation is around 2.5%, reflecting significant progress, but sustained 2% inflation is still a way off. Williams reiterated the Fed’s commitment to achieving this target during an event at the Reserve Bank of India in Mumbai. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He emphasized the importance of maintaining “well-anchored” inflation expectations and discussed the challenges of measuring key economic indicators, such as the long-run neutral interest rate, or r-star. He disputed claims that the neutral rate has increased since the pandemic, noting estimates that place it near pre-Covid-19 levels in both the U.S. and Eurozone. In June, officials raised their longer-term rate estimates to 2.8% from 2.6% in March.&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:54:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/fed-cutting-interest-rates-now-imminent</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c2281e0/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1440x1028!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F18%2Faf%2Fd40875a341efb8ab3beaf524bce3%2Fag-economists-monthly-monitor-rate-cuts-06-2024-web-main-image.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is the U.S. Ag Economy Heading Toward a Recession? A One-on-One with the President of the Chicago Fed</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/u-s-ag-economy-heading-toward-recession-one-one-president-chicago-fed</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        The
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; Federal Reserve&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         voted to keep the benchmark interest rate steady last week. The news didn’t come as a big surprise. Taming what’s been sticky inflation has proven to be a challenge, despite some promising inflation data that was reviewed during the Fed’s meeting, but agriculture is also feeling the pinch as higher input costs and high interest rates are eating into the outlook of the ag economy this year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for May was also released last week, showing inflation cooled slightly in May. The CPI climbed 3.3% year-over-year, according to data released last Wednesday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The index was flat month-over-month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The most recent inflation readings have been more favorable than earlier in the year, however, and there has been modest further progress toward our inflation objective,” said Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. “We are maintaining our restrictive stance of monetary policy in order to keep demand in line with supply and reduce inflationary pressures.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Inflation and Higher Interest Rates Pain Point for Farmers &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Inflation may have cooled for at least one month, but inflation and higher costs are also a growing pain point for farmers and ranchers. Net farm income is projected to fall back to levels agriculture saw in 2020, but the difference today is higher costs are eating into balance sheets across the U.S.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Farm Journal spoke to 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.chicagofed.org/utilities/about-us/office-of-the-president/office-of-the-president-home" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Austan Goolsbee, president and chief executive officer &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        of the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.chicagofed.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , during the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.iowafarmbureau.com/News/Economic-Summit" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Iowa Farm Bureau’s Economic Summit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         last Friday. It was the first day Goolsbee could speak to the press after the big Federal Reserve meeting. He acknowledged input costs are creating pain for farmers and ranchers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There are some parts of the ag sector really feeling the pinch. If you look at hogs, if you look at dairy, the basic dilemma is the output is sort of reduced and sales prices are down, but the input costs are not down. If anything, they’re up. Then, if you add on top of it the credit costs being as high as they are, I think that is where people are still getting squeezed,” Goolsbee says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Goolsbee says the May inflation data was promising, but he also notes that’s only one month of data. However, he says if there is more progress on taming inflation, then the Federal Reserve could start to cut rates to what he calls more “normal” levels, but he wouldn’t comment on how many rate cuts or the size of rate cuts the U.S. could potentially see this year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I’m hopeful that if we can make progress nationally on inflation, and rates could come down, that might give some relief in that space. Right now, repayment rates, if you look at delinquencies, they’re rising. They’re not to levels that you would call a recession, but they are rising. So, I think that’s an area of vulnerability,” says Goolsbee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Layoffs and Job Cuts Hit Agriculture&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        The impacts of tighter margins are affecting demand for everything from equipment and tires to seed and chemicals. 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/bayer-signs-agreement-management-job-cuts-with-labour-reps-2024-01-17/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Bayer, a global agricultural and pharmaceutical company, cut 1,500 jobs during the first three months of 2024&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , about two-thirds of which were management positions. More layoffs and early retirements are said to be on the way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just this month, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/machinery/new-machinery/john-deere-layoffs-what-we-know-so-far#:~:text=John%20Deere%20has%20also%20announced,state%20of%20Iowa%20in%202024." target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;John Deere announced it’s offered 103 early retirement buyouts and eliminated 650 total jobs &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        across its Iowa operations as of June 1. More job cuts are expected from the large equipment manufacturer based in the U.S. John Deere has also announced its intention to move its production of mid-frame skid steer loaders and compact loaders from its plant in Dubuque, Iowa, to a proposed new production facility in Mexico.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        &lt;h4&gt;&lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/farmers-look-cut-costs-2025-machinery-and-technology-could-take" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Story: As Farmers Look to Cut Costs for 2025, Machinery and Technology Could Take the Biggest Hit&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        Meanwhile, Bridgestone Americas announced last week it’s laying off 118 workers at its Des Moines, Iowa, plant citing lower demand for ag tires.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think the ag economy is a little bit of a different story than the general economy,” Goolsbee tells Farm Journal. “And partly, we’re readjusting. We just went through three-plus years that were extremely unusual, and in many ways, very strong for the ag economy. So, part of this is getting back to a more normal set of circumstances. And we’re going to have to adjust to that part of this.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The latest 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/agletter/index" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;AgLetter produced by the Chicago Fed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         was released in May. It showed:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;District agricultural credit conditions weakened a bit during the first quarter of 2024.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Repayment rates for non-real-estate farm loans were lower in the January through March period of 2024 compared with a year ago, and the renewals and extensions of these loans were higher.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;In the first quarter of 2024, demand for non-real-estate loans relative to a year ago was up for the second consecutive quarter, while the availability of funds for agricultural lending was down from a year earlier once again.&lt;br&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;Goolsbee says while farmers are dealing with the impacts of high input costs and higher interest rates, it’s also important to note agricultural companies, like Deere, are also very sensitive to high interest rates, as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“If you look at Deere and durable goods makers, in the strongest years, a lot of farmers bought a lot of equipment. So, when you look at just the durable goods cycle, there’s not as much demand, it’s kind of slowed. And for sure, high rates don’t make that any easier. So, I think part of this is cyclical and part of this is about that trend,” he adds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;What’s Causing Sticky Inflation?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Last week, Powell said it’s a “balancing act” to 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.barrons.com/livecoverage/fed-rates-meeting-powell-speech-today/card/powell-says-fed-still-looking-for-more-inflation-progress-z9pgRWVn8pPxY2c98oox?mod=livecoverage_web" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;lower inflation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , manage the “very strong” labor market, and keep the economy growing. The Fed’s goal is 2% inflation, and Goolsbee says the Fed won’t veer off course before it reaches 2%. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are several things that feed into the overall inflation number, including food, housing, services and energy. The food and energy portions, according to Goolsbee, are so volatile that the Fed tends to not look at those as much.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Goods inflation is back down to what it was pre-pandemic levels. It’s still above where we want it to be, but it’s improving. The puzzle, or the hard part, has been housing. Inflation there has been down a bit, but it’s still well above what it was before the pandemic,” Goolsbee says. “I’m a closet optimistic. Over the past 18 months, we’ve made a lot of progress at getting the inflation rate down. That’s something different than saying our prices are going to go back to the level we were at pre-pandemic.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What’s driving inflation? Goolsbee says that is a puzzle as well, but he says there are two major pieces to the sticky inflation situation that’s continuing to hang over the economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“One is it just got way too high, and then the second is, it’s proved more persistent and stickier than what we thought,” says Goolsbee. “I think that’s a big component. And you see that in the ag economy in Iowa with input costs and the supply-side damage. Some of it came from COVID, but that deterioration led to a lot of the inflation. As that’s been healing, that’s allowed the inflation rate to come down without a recession.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        &lt;h4&gt;&lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/margin-squeeze-setting-across-row-crop-farms-and-80-ag-economists" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related News: A Margin Squeeze is Setting in Across Row-Crop Farms, and 80% of Ag Economists Are Now Concerned It’ll Accelerate Consolidation&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        Goolsbee says never in history has the U.S. seen inflation fall as fast as it has without a recession. But in 2023, he says inflation came down without a recession, which was good to see.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think the other component is the Fed, by setting the rates higher, has put some restriction on the economy to try to reduce the amount of overheating. And that’s also, I think, contributed to getting inflation down. We’ve made a lot of progress, but there’s still a fair amount to go,” Goolsbee says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Future of Fed Interest Rate Cuts &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        With more work to do in order to get to the Fed’s target of 2%, Goolsbee has been impressed with the resilience of the general economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“If you look for sure, internationally, at the U.S. growth, we’ve grown a lot,” says Goolsbee. “We’re actually higher than where you would have been when people were making predictions of where just the GDP would be at this point before they had ever heard of COVID. We’re actually above where they were predicting we would be. And we’re the only economy where that’s true. So, I’ve been very impressed with that resilience.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Goolsbee says if inflation data continues to come in lower, and the jobs growth posts strong gains, then the Fed could cut rates to more normal levels. But until then, Goolsbee insists the Federal Reserve won’t budge on interest rates.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 16:15:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/u-s-ag-economy-heading-toward-recession-one-one-president-chicago-fed</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>As Farmers Look to Cut Costs for 2025, Machinery and Technology Could Take the Biggest Hit</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/farmers-look-cut-costs-2025-machinery-and-technology-could-take-biggest-hit</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Commodity prices have seen a bit of a rebound over the past month, but even with optimism beginning to surface with prices, agricultural economists think net farm income could fall more than expected, and the fallout could be felt with just how much farmers scale back what they purchase over the next year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;May Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , a joint survey of nearly 70 ag economists conducted by the University of Missouri and Farm Journal, is one metric to help gauge the health of the ag economy. As global weather and geopolitical events continue to impact the markets, ag economists grew slightly more optimistic on the health of the overall ag economy in the past month. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think you can look at things like crops in South America, you know, we’ve had some disease issues in places like Argentina, we’ve had some wet weather in Brazil, some of those things, I think, have been helpful to boost prices at the same time. The wheat situation in Russia, I think, has also been important in terms of prices,” says Scott Brown, interim director, Rural and Farm Finance Policy Analysis Center (RaFF), University of Missouri. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-de0000" name="image-de0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/0314695/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6cde19a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/7751e60/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/565ac27/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="729" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/24168de/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4014694/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/568x288!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a24b93b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/768x389!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bbce15f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1024x518!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/24168de/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="729" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/24168de/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x425+0+0/resize/1440x729!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Ag%20Economy%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Brown helps author the Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor, and he says the May Monitor shows even with more optimism for some commodities, ag economists’ views on the net farm income picture slightly eroded over the past month, falling from the $117.82 billion projected in the April survey, to $110.4 billion in May.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think it’s important to remind ourselves, the changes happen really quickly,” Brown says. “The volatility up and down, is going to continue in front of us. So, although we generally say the trend is down, there will be opportunities for better prices in front of us at times.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-e10000" name="image-e10000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="771" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1356a1b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/568x304!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b67ced5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/768x411!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/2a946ca/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/1024x548!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/11dfddf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/1440x771!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="771" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/61ffeeb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/1440x771!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/f204d2d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/568x304!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ceebd8f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/768x411!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b1e37dc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/1024x548!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/61ffeeb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/1440x771!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="771" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/61ffeeb/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x450+0+0/resize/1440x771!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%2005-2024%20-%20US%20Ag%20Economic%20Outlook3.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Arlan Suderman, chief commodities economist for StoneX, is one of the nearly 70 ag economists surveyed each month. He says even with the global grain and oilseed supply weather issues around the globe, his outlook on the ag economy hasn’t changed course. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I don’t think it really has, if anything, I think it’s become a little bit more challenging,” Suderman says. “But I say that within the context. I think that the new world we’re in is going to have more challenges. But those challenges will also create more opportunities. It just means we’re going to have to be more strategic. We went through several years where you could be a lazy marketer and do pretty well - build equity in your farm, expand your operation and buy equipment. We’re going to have to be more strategic in it now. And I think the opportunities are going to be there for the person willing to do so.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="IframeModule"&gt;
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="id-https-players-brightcove-net-5176256085001-default-default-index-html-videoid-6354026316112" name="id-https-players-brightcove-net-5176256085001-default-default-index-html-videoid-6354026316112"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;iframe name="id_https://players.brightcove.net/5176256085001/default_default/index.html?videoId=6354026316112" src="//players.brightcove.net/5176256085001/default_default/index.html?videoId=6354026316112" height="600" style="width:100%"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Farmers Forced to Cut Costs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/margin-squeeze-setting-across-row-crop-farms-and-80-ag-economists" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Last month’s survey &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        found nearly 80% of ag economists think current commodity prices, plus higher input and operating costs will spur consolidation within the row crop sector. This month, the survey asked what purchasing decisions may take a hit in the months ahead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the top of the list of purchase changes for 2025 was decisions regarding equipment. When asked if farmers would reduce machinery purchases for 2025, 50% of ag economists responded “most likely,” and the other 50% said “somewhat likely.” &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It seemed scaling back on machinery purchases was really the number one purchase change, and I don’t think that’s a big surprise. Almost everyone thought that was one place where we would see cutbacks in terms of trying to reduce costs,” Brown says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think in the short-term, that is the easy answer is they’ll scale back on equipment purchases, and we’ve seen that,” Suderman says. “We would also anticipate them to scale back on some of those fertilizers that have less short-term impact, maybe phosphorus, potassium, some of those. I think farmers will stick with the seed technology, they’ll stick with the technology they think gives them the efficiencies that they need in their production.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economists point out machinery purchases are likely to slow, which will reduce capital costs, but could also potentially increase repair and maintenance expenditures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-440000" name="image-440000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="2057" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3b13e9f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/568x811!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/714914c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/768x1097!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/74df231/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/1024x1463!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d159910/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/1440x2057!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="2057" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/769e6a7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/1440x2057!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d87d40d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/568x811!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/984d110/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/768x1097!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/787277f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/1024x1463!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/769e6a7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/1440x2057!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="2057" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/769e6a7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x1200+0+0/resize/1440x2057!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Purchase%20Changes%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Another change ag economists think farmers will make is to slow technology upgrades. 35% responded a move to scale back technology upgrades is “most likely,” and 41% said “somewhat likely.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The May Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor also found ag economists think more farmers will make the switch to more generic products, with 73% surveyed responding with “somewhat likely.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economists also think another change for the upcoming year could be looking for lower interest rates. 65% said “somewhat likely,” 27% said “most likely.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think for producers, in terms of what they want to add in 2025, are already beginning to focus on the changes they can make to be more efficient,” Brown says. “This idea of how to reduce costs when the prices for those inputs maybe aren’t going to change as much as they would like, and how to manage those margins, there is really going to be some opportunities to do that to try to make 2025 a better year.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Economists Paint Mixed Picture on Price Outlook&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        As farmer possibly look at ways to cut back on spending, volatile commodity prices have become the new norm for farmers. As economists point out, the direction of commodity prices also now hinges on more than just supply and demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Well, I think the biggest impact is probably geopolitical risks, and the advent of the funds, trying to interpret all of that,” Suderman says. “And as you look at the management of billions of dollars now invested in commodities, either being long and buying them or being short selling them, based on what they see happening in geopolitics, based on what they see in the economy, are we in a re-inflation period? Are we in commodity deflation period? And that’s really driving the economy, more than the actual supply and demand fundamentals.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-470000" name="image-470000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1243" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6f66d3f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/568x490!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b3fea64/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/768x663!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a7d6dee/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/1024x884!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ae19cb2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/1440x1243!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1243" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4230181/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/1440x1243!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d10cf46/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/568x490!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8eae3c9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/768x663!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/f02c9d7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/1024x884!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4230181/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/1440x1243!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1243" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/4230181/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x725+0+0/resize/1440x1243!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Price%20Outlook%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-490000" name="image-490000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="483" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/0a0d743/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/568x191!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e7446cc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/768x258!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/734f312/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/1024x343!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/fc84710/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/1440x483!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="483" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d43ef0c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/1440x483!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/cfd76a7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/568x191!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6e4b9b7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/768x258!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/73defcc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/1024x343!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d43ef0c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/1440x483!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="483" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d43ef0c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x282+0+0/resize/1440x483!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20What%20could%20impact%20crop%20prices%20in%20the%20next%206%20months.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        Still, Suderman and other economists say in the short-term, the outlook for grain prices will center around supply and what happens with weather. One of the major wildcards for the summer is the transition from El Nino to La Nina, and not only how quickly it occurs, but what areas of the U.S. crop and cattle production could be hit by dry and hot weather.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Suderman still thinks the health of the U.S. and global economies will be a critical piece to watch over the next 12 months, particularly if we reestablish inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other economists also pointed to inflation in the May Monthly Monitor. “I expect a return of inflation and tighter credit due to expanding Congressional spending and the expanding national debt,” said one economist in the anonymous survey.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Beef Prices and Demand &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        The inflation piece is something Suderman says could impact both grain and livestock prices, especially considering demand and the health of global economy will have a major impact on prices as we test just how much consumers are willing to pay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We’re in a world economy where imports of beef in the first quarter of this year were up 25% year on year. So, when we get too expensive, we simply import more. And then the consumer is the driver of what that the demand factor is moving forward,” Suderman says. “If we keep the consumer confidence and we prop it up, they’re willing to pay more, which means import more but holding up our domestic prices. If they’re not, then those imports start to overwhelm us and pressures beef prices even more.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-4b0000" name="image-4b0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="686" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bcb3709/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/568x271!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/339aa03/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/768x366!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/5ee6d9d/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/1024x488!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/2805558/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/1440x686!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="686" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6141d1f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/1440x686!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Ag%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ed37b09/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/568x271!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ad04a5c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/768x366!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/97e6a3e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/1024x488!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6141d1f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/1440x686!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="686" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/6141d1f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x400+0+0/resize/1440x686!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%2005-2024%20Whats%20impacting%20the%20outlook%20for%20fed%20cattle%20and%20hog%20prices.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pork Price Outlook&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Impressive export demand has also been a bright spot for U.S. pork producers. The strong export picture has propelled prices for hog producers across the U.S., which helps paint a more positive picture for an industry that was hit hard over the past 12 to 14 months. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Hog prices, I think, have been the surprise, and a surprise in a good way,” Brown says. “We started 2024 with lower prices. Generally, those in the survey answering about pork prices would have been slightly more optimistic relative to the last. So, I think when you look at where wholesale pork prices are today, they could be supportive of yet higher hog prices.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brown points out consumer demand is also a major factor for the trajectory of hog prices the remainder of the year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“If consumer demand were to slow, and that’s just as much international demand that has the attention of the economist in terms of international demand has been good for pork this year, if it were to waver in the second half, that could be more troubling for where we’re at the pork market,” Brown says.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What else are economists saying about the ag economy? You can view previous Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor updates 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 16:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/farmers-look-cut-costs-2025-machinery-and-technology-could-take-biggest-hit</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c576c65/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1200x857+0+0/resize/1440x1028!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2024-05%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Net%20Farm%20Income%20-%2005-2024%20-%20WEB.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From a Recession in China to $4 Corn, Here Are 10 Potential Surprises Ag Economists Say Could Impact Agriculture in 2024</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/recession-china-4-corn-here-are-10-potential-surprises-ag-economists-say-could-impact-a</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        From the election to world trade, as well as geopolitical factors that have the potential to shape agriculture in 2024, ag economists think the coming year is poised for several possible surprises that could have a direct impact on farmers across the U.S. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The December Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor, a survey conducted by University of Missouri and Farm Journal, shows economists’ views on the ag economy are slightly more positive compared with the past month. While expectations about 2024 net farm income remained steady, ag economists’ outlook for the year ahead grew slightly more pessimistic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-950000" name="image-950000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1032" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/e105b10/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/568x407!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3395b42/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/768x550!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/33de9fe/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1024x734!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/427e79e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1032" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/03a56fc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Survey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/66e01d1/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/568x407!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c6d3848/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/768x550!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/89c387c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1024x734!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/03a56fc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1032" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/03a56fc/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FSurvey%20Average%20U.S.%20Farm%20Income_A.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nearly 70 ag economists are invited to participate in the survey each month. When asked the two most important factors driving agriculture’s economic health today, as well as over the next 12 months, views were mixed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Macroeconomic influences, including persistent interest rate pressure and dollar value,” responded one economist in the anonymous survey.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Declining prices for most major commodities reducing receipts and tightening margins despite some input prices retreating,” said another economist. “There is also some concern about multiple years of lower net farm income beginning to weaken relatively strong farm financial positions.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Macroeconomic influences, like interest rates and dollar value, and the impact of funds positions in the commodities markets are impacting the current environment,” was another response from the survey. “There’s been some improvement in recent months, but farmers are still facing relatively high costs and low commodity prices resulting in tight margins. Over the next 12 months, I marked unchanged for state of the ag economy on the expectation for continued improvement in macro influences and margins, but also multiple years of lower net income environment beginning to weaken the strong farm financial positions of the past few years.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Expect the Unexpected&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Looking ahead at 2024, economists in the December Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor were asked, “What unexpected news headline would you not be surprised to read in 2024?” Ag economists said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;China falls into big recession.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;A second extension of the farm bill.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Corn prices test $4 again.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Inflation supports managed money returning to the commodities again. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;World ends, poor hurt worst.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Record beef imports in 2023.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;National corn yield &amp;gt;190 bpa; U.S. embargoes ag exports to China. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;End to Russia/Ukraine war bumps global food grain supplies and cuts prices.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;2024 planted acres across all crops similar to 2023.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Economic woes unfold for U.S. agriculture as input costs remain high and farm prices falter.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;What Shaped Crop and Livestock Prices in 2023?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        When asked the biggest event or factor that impacted crop prices in 2023, ag economists said it’s all about supply and demand, sprinkled in with impacts from the strong U.S. dollar. They said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Large corn acreage and rebound in the U.S. corn crop, despite weather challenges.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Build back of stocks levels globally for crops, including exports from Brazil, Russia and other key areas.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Price retreat based on weak demand and rebounding yields; also higher interest rates contributing to stronger dollar and weaker demand.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For livestock prices, ag economists say 2023 was more about cow numbers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Low beef cow inventory due to continuing effects of weather challenges and economics supporting high prices.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Price pressure among other livestock commodities.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;2024: Biggest Economic Concerns &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Ag economists were also asked to look ahead at 2024. When asked what they are most concerned about when it comes to the ag economy, geopolitical issues and the U.S. presidential election rose to the top of their concerns, including:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Geopolitical factors, including war and disruption, global competition and other potential disruptions.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Domestic politics, including the 2024 election and policy detrimental to biofuels use, and government debt leading to rising interest rates and finance costs.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Decline in commodity prices paired with increasing input and land costs, leading to squeeze in margins.&lt;br&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;“Crop prices could fall further, adding to a price-cost squeeze for many crop producers. Such a development would, of course, tend to help the livestock sector. We could be entering a period where the fortunes of crop and livestock producers may diverge,” said one economist this month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“South American competition as well as authoritarian governments in places like Argentina, the Netherlands and possibly the U.S.,” responded another economist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Optimism for 2024&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        There is also optimism for the year ahead, which is sprouting from the possibility for continued improvement in drought as well as new areas of demand. Ag economists were asked what they’re most optimistic about when it comes to the ag economy, and economists surveyed said:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Demand opportunities through domestic soybean crushing, renewable fuel, SAF and global oilseed.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Robust domestic consumption and opportunity for competitive pricing of U.S. commodities in global markets.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Improved farm-level conditions related to efficiency, moisture conditions and farm income above historical averages (if a recession is avoided and input costs come down); many ag producers still have a strong balance sheet.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Recession or Soft Landing in 2024&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The U.S. avoided a recession in 2023, and majority of ag economists think the U.S. won’t enter a recession in 2024. After the Federal Reserve hinted toward interest rate cuts in 2024, some think there’s still a chance the country will see a slight increase in rates in 2024. The majority said they expect a 0% to 1% decline in interest rates in 2024.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-9a0000" name="image-9a0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1032" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b15e4d8/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/568x407!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1ebc86f/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/768x550!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/5fa7cee/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1024x734!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/04a221a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1032" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9401ec2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="U.S.%20Economy_A.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/89ef830/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/568x407!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/659363c/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/768x550!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/63e1339/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1024x734!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9401ec2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1032" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9401ec2/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FU.S.%20Economy_A.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While one economist warned of the impacts if the Fed were to start cutting rates too soon, economists point out the general economy has been resilient in spite of wars and inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; “It now looks like a fairly soft landing,” said one economist regarding the outlook for interest rates and whether the U.S. will enter into a recession next year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Some leading indicators continue to point toward recession, but so far, the economy has avoided recession. The December FOMC dot plot and post-meeting comments reiterate their efforts to guide the economy to a soft-landing,” said another economist&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There are certainly risks, but the odds of ‘muddling through’ appear to be rising,” said one economist in the survey. “With inflation declining, the Fed may be able to relax interest-rate policies in late 2024.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-9c0000" name="image-9c0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1032" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/f2f66fa/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/568x407!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/2515cd7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/768x550!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/315e324/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1024x734!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/aa34cb7/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1032" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bf7a245/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="Benchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/298ee93/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/568x407!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/9c4f9c5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/768x550!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/b0db429/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1024x734!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bf7a245/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1032" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/bf7a245/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2FBenchmark%20Interest%20Rate%20in%202024_A_0.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, not all economists are in the camp the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates next year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“It may be a mild one if it occurs. If it doesn’t occur, that will suggest risk of higher interest rates,” said another economist.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There are a lot of mixed signals in the economy,” pointed out another economist. “GDP is growing, inflation is cooling off, low unemployment, growing stock market — all positive. Higher interest rates, credit card balances are negatives.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;View more results from the Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2023 20:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/recession-china-4-corn-here-are-10-potential-surprises-ag-economists-say-could-impact-a</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/ddfc4e0/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2500x1792+0+0/resize/1440x1032!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-12%2FAgricultural%20Economy%20Situation_A_0.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fed Eyes Interest-Rate Cuts for 2024 as U.S. Economy Slows</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/fed-eyes-interest-rate-cuts-2024-u-s-economy-slows</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Current signals in the U.S. economy indicate the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates significantly next year. An initial cut could be made as early as the first quarter of 2024, though many analysts say cuts won’t begin until at least the second quarter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the key factors the central banking system will consider is whether its inflation rate target of 2% has been achieved, says Vince Malanga, president of LaSalle Economics. That percentage is what the Fed has said it has been aiming for in order to help the U.S. achieve a healthy economy with price stability. Currently, the inflation rate is about 3.2%, but interest rates remain high.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I think you’re going to see a marked, dramatic slowdown in inflation here in the next two or three months. And that will give indications that the Fed is at its 2% target, ” Malanga told AgriTalk Host Chip Flory on Tuesday. “If the Fed is at its 2% target, it’s going to be very hard pressed to make a case for (any additional) tightening.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;An About Face In Attitude&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Flory noted that the potential for interest-rate cuts show there’s been a big shift in attitude by the Fed that has occurred in a relatively short period of time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The marketplace has swung very quickly from (saying) ‘more rate hikes are coming’ to ‘hold rates higher for longer’ to ‘maybe a rate cut sometime in 2024’ to ‘a rate cut will be coming in March of 2024,’” Flory said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Malanga said the shift in attitude by the Fed started in September when interest rates were up to 5% on the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The view was, ‘Well, the Fed won’t have to tighten anymore, because the long end of the bond market is doing its work for them.’ But right after that, of course, the inflation numbers started to come in better than was generally expected, and there was some evidence out there that the economy was starting to slow. And I think both of those developments are building some momentum now,” Malanga told Flory. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Malanga said he believes the U.S. will release a relatively weak employment report this Friday. Furthermore, he anticipates the U.S. will have “good inflation numbers” by the time the Fed meets on Dec. 12.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“There are a lot of indications out here that the labor market is softening up. Historically, when the unemployment rate goes up by more than a half a percent that’s a signal of a recession,” Malanga said. “We’re right on the verge of that, and so I think that’s contributing to the psychology.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Predictions Are Split Between Camps&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Financial institutions are divided on whether Americans should anticipate going into a recession next year. For example, Bank of America says the U.S. will achieve a “soft landing,” while Deutsch Bank predicts a “mild recession.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One factor likely to contribute significantly to the camp predicting a soft landing: 2024 is an election year. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The Fed doesn’t want to have a recession. So, if the indicators are really pointing towards softness, that would urge them to (move) even faster,” Malanga said. “There will be a lot of political pressure placed on the Fed this summer, if the economy is slipping into a real recession.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The full discussion between Malanga and Flory on the state of the U.S. economy is available below:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/5-balance-sheet-busters-watch-2024" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;5 Balance Sheet Busters to Watch in 2024&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/better-yields-and-improved-crop-prices-propel-ag-economists" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Better Yields and Improved Crop Prices Propel Ag Economists’ Outlooks for 2024&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/markets/grain-markets/el-ninos-effect-crop-prices" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;El Nino’s Effect on Crop Prices&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="IframeModule"&gt;
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="id-https-omny-fm-shows-agritalk-agritalk-12-5-23-dr-vince-malanga-embed-style-artwork" name="id-https-omny-fm-shows-agritalk-agritalk-12-5-23-dr-vince-malanga-embed-style-artwork"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;iframe name="id_https://omny.fm/shows/agritalk/agritalk-12-5-23-dr-vince-malanga/embed?style=artwork" src="//omny.fm/shows/agritalk/agritalk-12-5-23-dr-vince-malanga/embed?style=artwork" height="180" style="width:100%"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 19:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/ag-policy/fed-eyes-interest-rate-cuts-2024-u-s-economy-slows</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/8157a92/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-12%2FInflation%20Money%20Retail%20Gas%20Pump_Credit-iStock%2C%20Farm%20Journal.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>High Interest Rates Are Already Impacting Farmers, And It's Coming at the Expense of Ag Loans</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/high-interest-rates-are-already-impacting-farmers-and-its-coming-expense-ag-loans</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Farmers are opting to tap into their savings from recent prosperous years instead of taking out loans at the highest interest rates since 2007, according to surveys conducted by regional Federal Reserve banks. Reports indicate that the average operating loan issued in the past summer was almost 20% smaller than the previous year’s average.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=0013HuRPRy0VRrb5XVxq1wbiagTos1c1InFC4e9GwF1MiQjGMd9V0RbZHZsH7IAFNVHXln2pr8yJHpHui47flV0607T8LRne_SKXr1xBQfl-SQv91PfwXOWWOHSjmQ_wCIofoCXIoittDmHRzlWC_oyyuNYywgi8FZ-ziG6LiVkfrdMXYP1w73kxtaLtOjBFHQhgd_0Oim_5SJRL-NuNWznggoqf4vVnkm8rwDBaMN-mPjNS8ehO4tc2lcfKT0kFZ-CZyBYZcUmTJ4=&amp;amp;c=R9TP30Bjbuit_NXg7t7cib3VnZdHRlbDhDEqbLg-X0h8BoHZt6pctA==&amp;amp;ch=AZuVPDPCxooH4dnPGZDX6O4ysTJlo6HcGTZJjtb-cco4po1vm8YBYA==" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;The Kansas City Fed noted&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         that lending activity has weakened, influenced by nearly two years of rising interest rates on farm loans, which have significantly increased financing costs for farmers. While the farm economy has recently shown moderation due to narrower profit margins driven by commodity prices and increased expenses, credit needs have risen for many farmers, mainly due to high input costs. However, many producers have been able to supplement their financial needs with savings amassed during previous profitable years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; USDA predicts that net farm income, a broad measure of farm profitability, will amount to $141.3 billion this year, marking a 22% decline from the record $183 billion in 2022. Despite this decrease, the income for this year would still be the second highest ever recorded and $40 billion above the 10-year average. The decline in income is attributed to lower receipts from crop and livestock sales, coupled with higher expenses. The debt-to-asset ratio, which indicates solvency, is expected to decrease slightly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Highest average interest rate on loans since 2007. The Kansas City Fed also reported that the average interest rate on various types of farm loans, after rising for nearly two years, has reached the highest level since 2007, standing at 8.34%. This surge in financing costs may have prompted farmers with substantial liquidity to limit their debt usage. However, any softening in farm finances could deplete cash reserves and result in increased demand for loans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because of reduced farm lending, the volume of operating loans exceeding $1 million has decreased by half compared to the previous year, and the volume of smaller-sized loans has dropped by 15 percent. This shift has favored smaller banks, which typically handle smaller loans, as they witnessed a 25 percent increase in non-real estate lending, while larger banks experienced a decline. The average operating loan for the summer amounted to nearly $59,000. Additionally, the average duration of new farm real estate loans has gradually increased over the past year, significantly exceeding the average loan duration from 2010 to 2020, while maturity dates for operating, livestock, and equipment loans remained stable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2023 14:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/high-interest-rates-are-already-impacting-farmers-and-its-coming-expense-ag-loans</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/35e9fcf/2147483647/strip/true/crop/800x534+0+0/resize/1440x961!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fk1-prod-farm-journal.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fbrightspot%2F43%2F13%2F7e4576cd4eef9c7e064d94f3befc%2Fbank-security.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is A Recession Imminent? Here Are The Red Flags Ag Economists Are Now Watching</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/recession-imminent-here-are-red-flags-ag-economists-are-now-watching</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Recession talk has been rampant for more than two years. While ag economists continue to be at odds when it comes to the likelihood of a recession in the United States, there are also concerns about economic woes around the globe. Some economists doubt the United States’ biggest importers will be able to avoid a recession over the next 18 months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the latest Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor, a survey of nearly 60 ag economists from across the country, the economists were asked if the United States’ major importers will avoid a recession over the next 18 months. Of those who answered the question, nine said “yes,” but eight responded “no.” Four remained unsure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The economists were then asked to explain the reasoning behind their response. The answers revealed a host of concerns, including labor shortages, risks in China and Europe as well as the strength of the U.S. dollar, as to why the economists think a recession might be imminent for those countries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“The slowdown in global trade and the strength of the dollar are placing excessive pressure on importers,” said one economist in the anonymous survey.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“Of the countries the United States exports product to, China is the only one I have large concerns about. Europe has seen an economic slowdown, but I think they will avoid a recession over the next 18 months,” said another ag economist.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“It’s hard to imagine that much of the world won’t continue to be squeezed by too much private and government debt and rising interest rates, which ultimately ripples through all economies. The United States is the prettiest of the ugly horses,” was another response.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Out of all the responses, the biggest concern continues to be China. While economists say pork and beef exports might be the most at risk, a ripple effect around the globe is possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“The economic slowdown will result in some of our major importers entering a recession. It will remain slow recovery and growth longer term,” said one economist.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“China appears to have some economic problems. They have emerged as major importers of pork and beef, but they also remain a trading partner that contributes market uncertainty. On meats, traditional partners will be more important,” said another economist.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the United States, economists have been largely impressed by the resiliency of American consumers, but many point to red flags that continue to flash caution signs moving forward. One is the fact credit card debt is climbing at a time when inflation continues to eat away at consumers’ spending power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“The U.S. economy has proven to be more resilient than many expected with low unemployment and moderating inflation,” said one economist.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;“It’s touch and go in the United States,” was another response. “However, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for companies to raise prices and pass through higher input prices. That’ll likely mean margin compression, which translates to the need for layoffs. This won’t necessarily be deep, thus avoiding a recession, but there’s still some pain ahead for the economy.”&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Economists point out every recession is different, and the signs vary. So, what are economists watching to know if a recession in the United States is imminent? The September Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor revealed some of those signs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When asked to list the top three general economist indicators to gauge the likelihood of a recession, economists in the anonymous survey said: &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;“There is too much reliability in the inversion of the yield curve predicting a recession. Given the length of time the yield curve has been inverted, it is going to be difficult to not expect a recession. It is going to be exceptionally difficult and will take longer with more interest rate hikes for the Fed to achieve a 2% inflation rate than what the market is prepared for.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“I follow Fed monetary actions, interest rates and unemployment levels.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“I follow unemployment rate, hourly wage rate and consumer prices.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“I don’t think the Fed can get inflation down to the 2% mandate without a recession, if it holds to that mandate.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“Employment growth remains fairly strong, and the U.S. unemployment rate remains historically low. As long as there is not a sizable decline in demand for labor (which is what I believe), the U.S. should at worst have a shallow and relatively short recession.”&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“I tend to watch GDP and the Conference Board Leading Economic Index because that is a compilation of 10 leading indicator components. I watch on the inversion in the spread of long- and short-term treasuries yields, although that is also part of the LEI.“&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;“I like to look at GDP, real incomes and savings rate. Consumer debt like credit card debt is an interesting data point. I don’t do a lot of recession or general economic projections.”&lt;br&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/one-factor-could-make-or-break-farm-economy-over-next-12-months" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Ag economists’ view on the overall ag economy is also starting to erode&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . The September 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/topics/ag-economists-monthly-monitor" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        shows lower commodity prices, concerns about demand and a negative outlook for China’s economy are all contributing to the changing views, even as the cattle herd and U.S. corn and soybean crops continue to shrink. But the most influential piece of the farm economy might be the 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/markets/futures/corn-price" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;price of corn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Stories:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/one-factor-could-make-or-break-farm-economy-over-next-12-months" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;The One Factor That Could Make Or Break the Farm Economy Over the Next 12 Months&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.drovers.com/news/industry/out-10-biggest-ag-commodities-us-leading-ag-economists-are-most-bullish-beef-cattle" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Out Of The 10 Biggest Ag Commodities In The U.S., Leading Ag Economists Are Most Bullish On Beef Cattle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 14:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/recession-imminent-here-are-red-flags-ag-economists-are-now-watching</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/1746d6b/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-10%2FAg%20Economists%20Monthly%20Monitor%20-%20Recession%20Chart%20-%2009-2023%20-%20WEB.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Food Inflation Outlook for 2023 Drops Below Previous Projections</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/hog-production/food-inflation-outlook-2023-drops-below-previous-projections</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        USDA expects food price inflation for 2023 to be slightly lower at 5.8% compared to the previous projection of 5.9%. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The &lt;b&gt;grocery store price inflation&lt;/b&gt; forecast has been significantly reduced by a whole percentage point to 4.9%. &lt;b&gt;Food price inflation&lt;/b&gt; for 2024 is expected to considerably decrease compared to 2023, with an expected rise of 2.4%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Restaurant prices are predicted to increase slightly less than before, now at 7.5% as compared to previous 7.7%. For 2024, a 6.1% rise in restaurant prices is anticipated.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interestingly, some food categories are expected to experience price declines in 2024, including pork, eggs, and dairy products. Notably, egg prices have shown significant volatility, escalating by as much as 37.8% in February 2023, yet ultimately expected to only rise 2% over the year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;USDA’s initial forecasts often undergo revisions, as seen in the fluctuations in 2023 food price inflation predictions beginning from July 2022. This dynamic forecasting, which includes various inputs like energy, labor, and maintenance costs, particularly affects restaurant prices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;For 2024, USDA projects that food price inflation will be lower than that seen in 2023 and significantly lower than the rise seen in 2022&lt;/b&gt;, though these are initial forecasts and subject to changes as more data comes in. However, despite the reductions, consumers will continue to pay more than the 20-year average for all types of food, marking a four-year trend. The anticipated reductions have been tied to interest-rate increases initiated by the Fed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 20:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/hog-production/food-inflation-outlook-2023-drops-below-previous-projections</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/492925e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-03%2FCash%3AMoney_Canva.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Calculate Your Personal Inflation Rate</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/how-calculate-your-personal-inflation-rate</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;See how rising costs impact you and your family&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Yes, inflation is at a 40-year high, but you might not be feeling its sharp bite. It all depends on where you spend your money. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Consumer Price Index is a basket of thousands of goods and services. In March, it marked a nearly 8.5% jump from a year ago. Categories such as gasoline, food and housing are the biggest contributors to the increase. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To analyze inflation’s threat to your farm and family, calculate your personal inflation rate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Determine your monthly expenses for the following categories: food and beverages, housing, clothing, transportation, medical care, recreation, education, communication and other goods and services. Include big-ticket items you pay once or twice a year, such as home insurance.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Subtract your monthly spending a year ago from your current monthly spending. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Divide that sum by your monthly spending from a year ago.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;For instance, if your spending last month was $4,500, and a year ago it was $4,250, the difference is $250. Divide $250 by $4,250 and you land at a personal inflation rate of 5.9%. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;MINIMIZE INFLATION IMPACTS&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Inflation is a growing risk for your farm and family. “It is also largely out of your control,” says Brent Gloy, economist at Agriculture Economic Insights. “What you can do is recognize prices are heading up and plan for it.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This inflation calculation can be an eye opener about your family living expenses. If tracking your expenses is intimidating, start small, encourages Alex White, farm and financial management instructor at Virginia Tech University. For one month, track all personal expenses on paper or with an electronic tool.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once you have current data, he says, you can see if you need to reduce expenses or set some financial goals. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h2&gt;You Are What You Spend&lt;/h2&gt;
    
        Some products and services have seen dramatic jumps in price. Luckily, a 13% jump in cracker prices isn’t felt as sharply as the nearly 40% increase in gas prices. Here are inflation levels for a few categories. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;div class="Enhancement" data-align-center&gt;
        &lt;div class="Enhancement-item"&gt;
            
            
                
                    
                        
                            &lt;figure class="Figure"&gt;
    
    &lt;a class="AnchorLink" id="image-ed0000" name="image-ed0000"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;


    
        &lt;picture&gt;
    
    
        
            

        
    

    
    
        
    
            &lt;source type="image/webp"  width="1440" height="1029" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/cb541b5/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/568x406!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/a56674e/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/768x549!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/0a2b4a3/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1024x732!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/99fc086/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/format/webp/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 1440w"/&gt;

    

    
        &lt;source width="1440" height="1029" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c5fcffa/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg"/&gt;

    


    
    
    &lt;img class="Image" alt="12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg" srcset="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/d09e3a9/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/568x406!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 568w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/025ae92/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/768x549!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 768w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/611c819/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1024x732!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 1024w,https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c5fcffa/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg 1440w" width="1440" height="1029" src="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/c5fcffa/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2Finline-images%2F12-Month%20Price%20Change.jpg" loading="lazy"
    &gt;


&lt;/picture&gt;

    

    
        &lt;div class="Figure-content"&gt;&lt;div class="Figure-credit"&gt;(Farm Journal)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
    
&lt;/figure&gt;

                        
                    
                
            
        &lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Read More&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/how-anchor-your-farms-profits-inflations-pull" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;How to Anchor Your Farm’s Profits From Inflation’s Pull&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/john-phipps-inflation-we-expect" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;John Phipps: The Inflation We Expect&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/markets/market-outlooks/3-economic-forces-watch-will-impact-agriculture" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;3 Economic Forces to Watch that Will Impact Agriculture&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/crops/crop-production/adios-ag-dollar-farmers-story-inflation-and-inputs" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Adios to the Ag Dollar: A Farmer’s Story on Inflation and Inputs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/business/taxes-and-finance/fed-behind-curve-battling-inflation" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Is the Fed Behind the Curve in Battling Inflation?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 20:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/how-calculate-your-personal-inflation-rate</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/3e03c99/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2022-04%2FCalculate%20Your%20Personal%20Inflation%20Rate.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>U.S. Inflation Continues to Decline, Down from 4% in May</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/hog-production/u-s-inflation-continues-decline-down-4-may</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        U.S. inflation continues to decline, with the top-line consumer price index (CPI) falling to 3% year-over-year in the previous month, the lowest since March 2021, down from 4% in May. This decrease is mainly due to dropping energy and slowing food prices. Meanwhile, service prices and the core index (which excludes food and energy) remain high, with the core CPI descending to 4.8%.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Shelter costs, including rent, have been the primary contributors to price increases. Despite some areas reporting a decrease in rent prices, high housing costs and rising interest rates continue to make homes less affordable and push rent prices up. Car insurance and healthcare costs are also rising, as providers and insurers pass on increased costs to consumers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        Related story: 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/policy/politics/john-phipps-link-between-rising-interest-rates-and-inflation-isnt-simple-you" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;John Phipps: The Link Between Rising Interest Rates and Inflation Isn’t as Simple as You Might Think&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        On the bright side, real wages have started to grow, with real average hourly earnings increasing 0.2% last month and up by 1.2% over the past year. However, they remain 3.2% lower than in December 2020, contributing to public dissatisfaction with the economic situation despite low unemployment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With real interest rates positive again and the money supply reduced by 4% over the last year, there are signs of monetary tightening. However, analysts say that by historical standards, these conditions are not exceptionally strict. The market is calling for cautious action from the Fed, guided by its mission to combat inflation, ideally taking advantage of the current stable labor market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Traders are betting the end of the tightening cycle is near with the odds of a September hike falling. The Fed is still expected to hike in July.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        Related story: 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/livestock/poultry/egg-prices-see-largest-monthly-drop-72-years-still-arent-back-normal" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Egg Prices See Largest Monthly Drop in 72 Years, But Still Aren’t Back to Normal&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;hr/&gt;
    
        Harvard University economist Jason Furman looks at seven different underlying inflation indexes over three-, six- and 12-month periods, then adjusts them to mimic the price index of personal-consumption expenditures, the basis for the Fed’s 2% target. The median of all those measures had fallen to 2.8% in June from 4% in April.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“I’m nervous about the euphoria” around the June CPI, Furman said, according to the WSJ. That said, he was “pleasantly surprised” at the progress on underlying inflation. He thinks that without a rise in unemployment, inflation will end the year around 3.5%; he expected 4% several months ago. He thinks that is still too high for the Fed: “A full-on soft landing would still require a decent amount of luck.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 03:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/hog-production/u-s-inflation-continues-decline-down-4-may</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/798e929/2147483647/strip/true/crop/840x600+0+0/resize/1440x1029!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2022-02%2Ffresh%20instagram%20%20%289%29.jpg" />
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Egg Prices See Largest Monthly Drop in 72 Years, But Still Aren't Back to Normal</title>
      <link>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/egg-prices-see-largest-monthly-drop-72-years-still-arent-back-normal</link>
      <description>&lt;div class="RichTextArticleBody RichTextBody"&gt;
    
        Egg prices have sent shoppers on a rollercoaster this year. May’s CPI shows inflation slowed, but food prices, housing prices and the cost of used vehicles are all attributing to current inflation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The most sizable drop came with egg prices. The CPI shows egg prices now average $2.66 per dozen, which represents the following changes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;13.8% lower month-over-month&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;That represents the largest monthly decline since January 1951&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Year-over-year, prices are only down 0.4%&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br&gt;Before shoppers get too excited, some historical perspective shows egg prices are still higher than average. A decade ago, egg prices were $1.91 per dozen. Even in 2020, egg prices were lower, averaging $1.51, which is more than $1 lower than what grocery shoppers are paying today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While the sudden decline may seem like shoppers are getting a bargain, it’s similar to what drivers experience with gas prices. When prices for a gallon of gas go from $2 to $4, then come back down but only to $3, it feels like prices are much cheaper, when in reality, prices are still higher than they were before the rapid spike.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Why Did Egg Prices Spike Higher Earlier This Year?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        According to economists, 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.agweb.com/news/livestock/poultry/whats-really-driving-egg-prices-138-higher-year" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;the rapid rise in egg prices was a function of supply and demand&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . In January, avian influenza caused U.S. egg producers to lose more than 50 million birds, many of those being commercial laying flocks. Couple that with high holiday demand for things like baking, and the two factors clashed to create higher prices at the store.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“We’ve had a significant reduction in supply from depopulation this spring and again in the fall and winter,” Lusk told AgWeb in January. “Couple that with inelastic demand for eggs, and you get the price spikes we’re seeing.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;Expensive Eggs Ate Into Bacon Demand&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        The CPI shows the price of bacon and related products fell 9.8% year-over-year. It’s also a 1.4% decline in a month. Prices may be on the decline, but one livestock economist thinks it’s possible the high egg prices also caused shoppers to buy less bacon.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During World Pork Expo last week, Steve Meyer of Partners for Production Agriculture, explained why he has a 
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/discouraging-outlook-ahead-bright-spots-exist-part-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;bleak outlook for the pork producers’ profits this year&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        . One reason is demand. Meyer also explained it’s not just due to the 35% spike in input costs compared to 2019, but also lower hog prices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Part of the problem is a decline in domestic demand, which is driven by wholesale demand, among four other factors. One of those four is the price of complementary goods, like eggs. As the rapid run-up in egg prices caused some shoppers to scale back on buying as many eggs for breakfast, that decision also hurt bacon demand and prices, as well. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
        &lt;h3&gt;&lt;b&gt;The Real Winner of the 2023 Egg War&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;
    
        Higher egg prices did bode well for backyard flocks. More Americans decided to try their own hand at raising a backyard flock, and as a result, chicken suppliers like Tractor Supply cashed in.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/laurendebter/2023/06/10/how-tractor-supplys-inflation-chickens-are-ruling-the-backyard-roost/?sh=6a4d57b47e71&amp;amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=dailydozen&amp;amp;cdlcid=62629c676e1a1d1211a4966c&amp;amp;section=business" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt; Forbes,&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
         
    
        &lt;span class="LinkEnhancement"&gt;&lt;a class="Link" href="https://www.tractorsupply.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Tractor Supply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
    
        , which is America’s largest seller of live poultry, could top the all-time record set in 2020. During the pandemic, more people had time at home, and Tractor Supply reportedly sold 11 million birds. This year, Tractor Supply’s foot traffic jumped 60%. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tractor Supply also acquired Orscheln Farm and Home this year. The announcement came last fall, but the transition took place this year, adding more than 80 stores under the Tractor Supply brand. Last year, Tractor Supply’s CEO said the acquisition means Tractor Supply would now have more than 2,100 stores and 50,000 employees. The company also projected an excess of $14 billion in annual revenue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
    
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:20:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.porkbusiness.com/news/industry/egg-prices-see-largest-monthly-drop-72-years-still-arent-back-normal</guid>
      <media:content medium="img" lang="en-US" url="https://assets.farmjournal.com/dims4/default/91baea8/2147483647/strip/true/crop/4601x3089+0+0/resize/1440x967!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffj-corp-pub.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fs3fs-public%2F2023-06%2Feggs-3506052%20pixabay.jpg" />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
