Immigration

America's Farm Labor Crisis: Can Immigration Reform Save Agriculture?

Tue, 02 Sep 2025 19:24:02 GMT

Walking orchards in the Central Valley, is something Scott Peters’ family has done for four generations. With his great grandfather settling in the fertile valley in 1933, the family has been immersed with changes. From regulations and battles over water, to the fight for labor and immigration, Peters Fruit Farms is not only working to preserve the past, but also fighting for their future.

“Today, we primarily grow stone fruit. We’ve gone a little bit into the citrus just to diversify. We have the packing house, so we want to keep it running year round. Citrus is the winter commodity, and stone fruit is the summer commodity,” Peters says.

The Peters are unique. They don’t just grow and pick the fruit. They’re also packers and shippers — an operation that relies on hundreds of employees throughout the year.

“Labor prices are really difficult for us,” says the California peach grower. “As an example, our minimum wage is $16.50. When we compete against Georgia (known as the ‘Peach State’), their minimum wage $7.25. It’s just under half of what we have to pay people, which means we just don’t have a margin of error. If there’s something wrong with the crop — if we have a weather event — it stings us a lot harder.”

California’s Farm Labor is Skilled and Difficult to Replace

That’s the reality for farmers across California. Not only are regulations and water becoming expensive for growers across the state, but labor costs are also on the rise. And considering labor is the highest cost for fruit growers, it’s putting a severe strain on producers.

And while it’s expensive, labor is one of Peters’ most critical resources.

“They’re a very talented labor force. We can’t just go and get somebody off the street,” he says. “We can’t get an H-2A worker from another country who doesn’t know the industry. They can’t do the same job.”

From Arizona to California, to meat processing plants that span across the U.S. Peters says that’s one of the biggest misconceptions about migrant labor. People may think they aren’t talented or skilled, but Peters argues they’re both.

“The supervisors have these rings, and we’ll open them up to the size of fruit we want picked. They will pick a few samples off the tree, show them what sits on the ring and what goes through the ring. And the labor we have picking in the orchard, they will know — just by looking at the rings — which fruit to pick,” Peters explains. “They’ll just go from limb to limb, tree to tree, and they’ll pick the size that we’re requesting by the rings.”

Scott Peters shows U.S. Farm Report host Tyne Morgan rings they use to show individuals who are picking the fruit just what size of fruit they need to pick that day. With barely any difference in the size, it shows just how skilled the labor that works in Peters’ orchards are today.

(Matt Mormann, Farm Journal )

Peters says, to the untrained eye, the difference in the size of the rings is unnoticeable — making the labor this orchard employs irreplaceable.

“That’s how skilled they are,” he says. “So when people say they’re replaceable and you can get H-2A people or other people off the street, no, it doesn’t work that way. Those people will have no idea that small of a difference when we’re asking them to pick a certain size.”

The Broken U.S. Immigration System

The individuals Peters employs aren’t part of the H-2A system. Instead, his workers have been in California for generations, doing manual labor many Americans either don’t want to do, or physically can’t do, at a speed that’s needed today.

“The immigration system in the U.S. is absolutely broken today,” Peters tells U.S. Farm Report. “Why? Because they don’t have a simple, easy way to make immigrants legal. It’s complicated. It’s not very easily accessible for the people. If they find a way to do it, it takes them a long time. We have employees that have gone through the process and are legal. At the time, we did not know they were not. We had no idea. When they come to us, they show us a valid ID, and they show a valid social security card. As far as we’re concerned, we are hiring legal people. And then they come back to us down the road and they show other cards and say, ‘Well, now i need to change.’ Then we have to abide by the new name because of the standards.”

Results from Farm Journal’s Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor

(Lindsey Pound )

Agricultural economists from across the U.S. agree. In the latest Farm Journal Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor , 87% of economists said the U.S. immigration system is broken for agriculture. But on the flip side, 87% of economists also said there will be no movement on immigration reform in 2025.

Manuel Cunha, president of the Nisei Farmers Leagu e, has been fighting for a fix to the current immigration system for decades. He says the current 40-year-old immigration system doesn’t work for agriculture. He argues it’s dramatically impacting California’s agricultural landscape.

“It’s horribly broken, and you can’t band-aid it together anymore,” Cunha tells U.S. Farm Report.

H-2A Program Doesn’t Work for California Agriculture

The H-2A guest worker program may work for some sectors of agriculture, but it’s not a comprehensive “fix” for agriculture — especially industries that rely on a large number of seasonal labor.

While the program is vital for addressing domestic labor shortages, for labor-intensive specialty crops like fruits and vegetables, the H-2A program is designed to provide a cortical legal source of labor where domestic workers are often unwilling or unavailable.

However, Cunha says what the H-2A guest worker program is designed to do, and how it actually works, are two different things.

“The cost is prohibitive. It’s a broken program. A guest worker program should be what it is. You go to the border, get a card and come into California or Arizona or wherever, work for 10 months and then leave,” Cunha says. “The system today requires people to through a process in the countries where you have recruiters that control the workers. They, in turn, kind of manipulate those workers where to go and how much you’re going to pay me, then the person comes here. On top of that, to provide required housing, transportation and meals is very costly. In this state, at $23 an hour, no farmer can afford that.”

Cunha says these are all reasons why the H-2A program must be reformed.

“We also must have a guest worker program for hotels, restaurants and construction to where those workers can come in here, they work for 10 months in a rotation, they go back and then they come back again,” Cunha says. “But it’s a guest worker program and not allowing the country to select and choose who you want. There has to be a great working relationship on a guest worker program that works for my industry and agriculture and the other industries as well.”

40-Year-Old Program

The last major immigration reform in the United States was the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which granted legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants and increased penalties for employers hiring them.

The legislation, now 40 years old, is something Cunha argues is out of date.

Efforts to pass new immigration legislation have frequently failed due to partisan disagreements and an inability to find common ground between parties and administrations.

“They use it so they can get re-elected every time. And it’s so sad that our legislators have that type of mentality. Let’s not fix it, because if we say we’re going fix it, that’s how we’ll get elected. That’s how we’ll get re-elected,” Cunha says. “It’s been broken, and it’s been a facade.”

Dignity Act of 2025

Cunha says the only solution on the table that would work today is the Dignity Act of 2025. The bill was introduced on July 15 by Representatives Maria Elvira Salazar (R-FL) and Veronica Escobar (D-TX).

The bill not only focuses on securing the border, but it provides legal status to qualifying undocumented immigrants. It also imposes higher penalties for illegal border crossings and human and child sex trafficking. Not only would it address America’s farm labor crisis, but Cunha says it could help save agricultural industries that rely heavily on migrant labor across the U.S.

“This is the first real immigration bill that has addressed industries. The Farm Worker Modernization Act was just ag, and it really didn’t do all of ag. It only did the field and not the packing houses or the processing,” Cunha explains. “But being that we’re in the year 2025, many industries like agriculture have the same problem. Those workers have been there for years. And so somehow, we need to give them that opportunity to have a legal means to work here and to travel home.

Cunha says the U.S. has to do something new when it comes to immigration reform, and the Dignity Act of 2025 gives that life.

“The president continually gives off positive vibes: ‘I want the workers to stay here. They are important for the industries, agriculture, the restaurants, the hotels, the construction.’ So, those people need to be here. The bill absolutely deals with that. It makes them have dignity, respect and the fear of not being apprehended any part of the day, going to church or going to the hospital or whatever. They would have a legal card, and the bill’s doing that,” Cunha says.

For now, there’s a nervousness among workers in California — essential labor that supports California’s multi-billion-dollar farming community.

“The workers that are here are more than any H-2A worker that could ever come into the unit. We have 1.6 million. The Department of Labor couldn’t even handle that number if they wanted to bring in H-2A people. The system would blow up,” Cunha says.

California Farmers Are Hopeful

In June, President Donald Trump said he would issue an order soon to address the effects of his immigration crackdown on the country’s farm and hotel industries, which rely heavily on migrant labor.

Trump continues to send mixed signals on immigration policies — even with his hints of a fix for agriculture. According to preliminary Census Bureau data, analyzed by the Pew Research Center , the number of immigrant workers in the U.S. has declined by 1.2 million from January through the end of July. That figure includes people who are in the country illegally, as well as legal residents.

Peters says, considering the Trump administration continues to focus on agriculture, he is hanging onto hope. The hope is that Washington will finally find a long-term fix that helps farmers and protects the precious labor they can’t do without.

“They’re very talented workers,” Peters says. “They have skills, and they’re very hard to replace. You have to train the new person, and it’s how fast they pick up on the training. We’ve looked at robots that do pick fruit. The technology is coming, but it’s not there yet. It’s got a ways to go.”

Americans’ View on Immigration

Americans seem to be growing more positive toward immigration over the past year. According to a Gallup poll released in June, a record-high 79% of U.S. adults say immigration is a good thing for the country.

According to Gallup, these shifts reverse a four-year trend of rising concern about immigration that began in 2021. And with illegal border crossings down sharply this year, the Gallup poll found fewer Americans back hard-line border enforcement measures, while more favor offering pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already in the U.S.

Increased I-9 Audits Forcing Dairies to Fire Employees, Exposing Immigration Flaws; There is a Short-Term Fix

Wed, 16 Jul 2025 11:18:48 GMT

Nervousness and frustrations are spreading across the dairy industry. It’s not U.S. Immigration and Customers Enforcement (ICE) raids causing the uneasiness. There’s now an increase in I-9 audits targeting dairies.

At least nine dairies were targeted with I-9 audits over the weekend, according a source in the dairy industry. That follows a South Dakota dairy who was surprised by an audit earlier this month. With reported flaws in the E-Verify system, the audits are resulting in dairies being forced to fire employees who are found to have illegal documents and only given 10 days to do so.

“I’ve heard it from both Texas and South Dakota dairy producers that they are having I-9 audits,” says Rick Naerebout, CEO of the Idaho Dairymen’s Association. “Uncertain as to the timing if these audits were triggered before Trump came out and said he was going to pause enforcement on farms. Really, we haven’t seen the same level of enforcement on farms since he came out a few weeks ago and made those public statements. You’ve had some other public statements that have somewhat conflicted that, but it does feel like there’s a different posture from this administration right now.”

There have been reports of ICE raids in other areas, but the increase in I-9 audits is isolated to mainly two states: South Dakota and Texas so far.

“Honestly, what’s a little bit curious about that is those are both red states, and there seems to have been a focus more on blue states and red states. And you, one of those states seems to be the [Secretary Noem’s] home state,” he adds. “So, there’s some curiousness to it all. I’m really not sure what’s triggering these I-9 audits. Typically, our experience in Idaho when we’ve had a dairy producer go through an I-9, it’s usually triggered by a former employee complaining after they’ve been let go. That’s been kind of the trigger is somebody complaining and then DHS coming in and and conducting an I-9 audit after there’s been an accusation of employment of unauthorized individuals, but really not sure, you know, what triggered these in those two states.”

What the Dairy Industry is Pushing to Change

Even though it seems to be isolated to South Dakota and Texas, it’s creating a nervousness on dairies across the country. And that’s because of the increased issues it’s causing with labor.

The dairy industry seems to be on an island when it comes to finding a legal workforce. Dairies aren’t seasonal, therefore they can’t utilize H-2A , and that’s something the dairy industry is pushing to change.

John Boelts, an Arizona farmer who’s also president of Arizona Farm Bureau, says the farther you get from the border, the more challenging it is to find enough labor within agriculture.

“We need programs that really address what we need in agriculture as far as on a labor basis,” Boelts says. “Many will point to H-2A and say, ‘Well, you have an uncapped H-2A guest worker program,’ and that’s a valid point. However, I’d like to point out that H-2A was designed very keenly not to work very well, to be cumbersome, challenging, expensive, all of the things that don’t fit very well into an agricultural model. That said, it’s the lifeline that American agriculture has today.”

H-2A is a program widely used in agriculture, but one that has drawn criticism for not only the rising cost, but also how complex it is. Those in agriculture argue the system, as it exists today, doesn’t do enough to cover the vastness of American agriculture. That includes dairy farms, dairy processors and produce processors.

And while H-2A is far from perfect, the dairy industry can’t use H-2A today, the one guest worker program that does exist, according to Donald Grady, the senior director of legislative affairs at the international dairy foods association.

“The H-2A program, while it works for large swaths of agriculture doesn’t work for dairy. And because of the fact that dairy is a 365-day-a-year operation, it doesn’t matter — Christmas, New Year’s, your birthday — cows must get milked. And that milk needs to get processed for Americans to safely consume it,” Grady says. “So we are looking to be able to expand the H-2A program so that dairy operations on-farm and in the plant can have another tool in their toolbox to meet their labor needs.”

Changes Are Needed to H-2A to Include Dairies

Grady says for dairy to be able to use the H-2A program in the U.S., the seasonality requirements in the program would need to change to year round. That’s one fix.

“But for processors, we need another specific change, and that is a change to the definition of agriculture, labor and services,” Grady says. “Right now, it does not include processing that does not happen on the farm. So, if you’re on a farm like a packing house for a fruit and vegetable operation, you can still use H-2A workers in that packing plant. But if that packing plan were just across the street and not on the farm, you couldn’t use those workers there. Dairy, obviously, the processing is largely located away from the farm. And so for us to be able to access H-2A, we need to change the definition of ag labor and services so that processing can be included.”

It’s a short-term fix, for what the dairy industry calls a long-term problem. Labor issues have plagued the dairy industry for decades, and it’s a situation that’s only getting worse.

“We need to figure out how we can simply improve our labor pool so that we can meet the needs that we have,” Grady says. “I think as we hear from our IDFA members across the board, we are down about 10% on our labor needs. That accounts to thousands and thousands and thousands of workers. When you look at the fact that we are over 3 million in the dairy manufacturing, retail and marketing side. So when you’re looking at just in the plant, that’s thousands of workers that we need. And this is a tool that would be able to help us in the immediacy.”

There is Momentum for Change

Even though there’s an increase in I-9 audits on dairies, leaders within the dairy industry say for the first time in nearly two decades, there does seem to be momentum for changes to the H-2A program and address the pain points with the current immigration system.

“You do hear some really good things coming from the administration right now about trying to solve the farm labor crisis, and it’s never had this amount of focus from any president, serious amount of focus, and it feels like there’s a serious amount of focus and an earnest desire to try and do something to solve our problem for us, which is a blessing,” Naerebout says. “We’ve been rebuffed by both Republican and Democrat presidencies in the past. We’ve been rebuffed by Republican and Democratic controlled Congresses, and to have a president take this issue on and begin to try and address it, and he and some of his secretaries have taken some pretty strong heat for for trying to solve this problem from his base, but he seems to be really, you know, earnest in trying to find a solution for us.”

E-Verify System is Also Exposing Flaws

One dairy operation was forced to fire nearly 40 employees, as they still scramble to find employees to back fill those jobs. That’s creating a new concern: Are the labor shortages a matter of animal welfare?

“I don’t think we’re quite there,” Naerebout says. “That’s always a concern, especially if you have a number of these audits that happen in a given area, and if you see a response like we saw in New Mexico a month or two ago where the response to that I-9 audit seemed to be DHS showing up and, you know, hauling workers away. That’s new.”

It’s not like these dairies are knowingly hiring individuals with false records. All dairy farms are required to use the E-Verify system, but the recent focus on finding illegal immigrants has exposed another issue: The E-Verify system is also flawed.

It’s a system that’s been used for more than two decades. For employers to make sure they are hiring legal immigrants, they use E-Verify, which is a government program that verifies those employees are authorized to work in the U.S.

In other words, these dairy operations are hiring employees who have been vetted through the E-Verify system. Yet, once an I-9 audit happens, it’s exposing that some of those employees submitted either illegal paperwork, or forms that weren’t theirs. And there’s no way for a dairy to know. That’s what the E-Verify system is meant to do.

It’s a long-standing frustration for dairies who’ve always been exposed to I-9 audits. It’s just until recently, the I-9 audits haven’t been as frequent.

“I definitely feel it’s flawed,” Naerebout says. “We also feel very strongly that it should not be on the employer to determine legal status of people in the country. That should be the job of the federal government. They shouldn’t be putting that on any employer, whether it’s agriculture or any other sector of the economy. That’s an unfair burden to put on the employer.”

What Needs to Happen Long-Term to Fix the Immigration System for Agriculture?

What needs to happen in the long-term? That solution lies with Congress. In order for the U.S. to address immigration laws that were written in 1986, it will take an act of Congress.

“We need to figure out how we can create a system that benefits our farmers by giving them access to workers and benefits the workers so that they can be able to cross the border legally and safely without having to feel like they’re going to get trapped in their home country and not be able to come back and work or feel as though they have to use different means to try and get into this country,” Grady says.

“We need a system that would benefit workers just as much as employers, but it’s the employers who need the workers for sure,” Boelts says.

The reality for growers like Boelts is no matter how high of wages producers pay, they are having more trouble finding the labor needed to fuel the U.S. with fresh produce and food.

“The challenge is for the American consumers, they need to look at it from a fairness standpoint,” Boelts says. “A worker working in Mexico harvesting broccoli or lettuce that then is shipped into the United States, might make $20 a day. Where we’re often offering around $20 plus an hour to work here in the United States. So it just doesn’t make sense. There’s really no reason why we shouldn’t be producing for the U.S. market right here in the U.S.”

Agriculture argues Congress needs to step in. Boelts says he is appreciative for an administration that is listening to farmers. So, what would Boelts tell the Trump administration when it comes to immigration? It’s this:

“I would ask the president and Secretary Rollins to take on a position of leadership, speak to both Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate, and say, ‘Look, you’ve been hearing about this for years from farmers and ranchers all over the country. We all know what needs to happen. We need to reform agricultural workers, the public policy governing folks coming into the country, both temporarily and permanently. We need options for agricultural producers.’”

Boelts says the solution can’t just be the argument that there is a temporary guest worker program that exists today, because that system is been broken.

“We have cows that need to be milked, livestock that needs to be tended day in and day out, sometimes year round, sometimes temporarily. We needed a program that’s designed to work for American agriculture, period,” Boelts says.

Naerebout agrees that even with the headlines focused on ICE raids, and now increased audits, President Donald Trump is listening to farmers and fixing what many argue is a broken immigration system, and we might finally see some solutions.

“We’ve not had this kind of traction with an administration ever on this issue,” he says. “Maybe Reagan, but I was 7 years old when Ronald Reagan worked on this issue back in 1986, so I can’t really speak to what the mood was then, but we’re cautiously optimistic here in Idaho. We’re watching what the president’s saying, we’re continuing to stay in close contact with our Senate and congressional offices to continue to make sure that when they get the opportunities to put a bug in the president’s ear, and anybody in the administration’s ear about our needs, that that’s happening.”

Naerebout says after 20 plus years, he thinks agriculture finally has a legitimate chance on solving a problem that’s been plaguing the industry. And that solution needs to not only come from the White House, but the long-term fix needs to be addressed by Congress.

Agriculture in the Bull's-Eye: Raids Reportedly Resume on Farms, Meatpacking Plants

Fri, 20 Jun 2025 20:50:51 GMT

After President Donald Trump reportedly ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE ) to pause raids on farms and meatpacking plants last week, new reports say the administration is reversing course again. The on-again, off-again reports regarding ICE raids is sowing confusion for those who rely on immigrant labor and already causing labor shortages due to employees not showing up for work.

There was an update again late Friday, with President Trump saying he’s looking at new immigration policy steps that would allow farms to take responsibility for people they hire.

The Washington Post first reported Monday that ICE officials told leaders representing field offices across the country they must continue to conduct raids at worksite locations, which is a reversal from guidance issued just days earlier.

Officials with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wouldn’t confirm the Washington Post’s report, but an agricultural association told Farm Journal the article is accurate based on their discussions with the administration.

Instead, DHS told us this:

“The president has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE’s efforts,” says DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safe guard public safety, national security and economic stability. These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation.”

By Friday, there was another update. Reuters reported President Trump said he was looking at immigration policy steps that would allow farms to take responsibility for people they hire.

“We’re looking at doing something where, in the case of good, reputable farmers, they can take responsibility for the people that they hire and let them have responsibility, because we can’t put the farms out of business,” Trump told reporters. “And at the same time we don’t want to hurt people that aren’t criminals.”

According to Farm Journal’s Michelle Rook, the recent ICE raids are already creating absenteeism and labor shortages that could severally disrupt the U.S. food supply. Ag groups are again calling for immigration reform with hopes the issue will finally come to a head.

Ripple Effect of Immigration Crackdown

Joe Del Bosque, owner of Del Bosque Farms in Firebaugh, Calif., is experiencing the rollercoaster with labor, saying the shifting policy strikes fear in farmers and workers.

“There’s so much uncertainty as to what the administration’s going to do,” Del Bosque told Rook on AgriTalk this week.

Del Bosque says the raids on California produce farms are disrupting the harvest of perishable produce.

“They haven’t been really huge sweeps. They’re usually picking up a few people. But it creates a lot of fear, and people don’t show up to work. That’s just as bad as if they were taken away,” he says.

According to an exclusive report by Farm Journal’s The Packer , the ripple effect of Trump’s immigration crackdown on agriculture could be far-reaching — if the administration revives its focus on ag.

Kevin Kelly is the CEO of Emerald Packaging — the largest flexible packaging supplier to the leafy greens industry. Based in Union City, Calif., the company has been in the packaging business for 62 years. Kelly says the immigrant workforce in California is feeling uncertain and afraid.

“We’ve certainly heard folks aren’t turning up to work in the fields, and we’ve seen it in our facility. We verify everybody, so we know everybody in our facility is documented and can legally work in the United States,” Kelly tells Jennifer Strailey, editor of The Packer. “In our case, it’s brothers and sisters being deported, and other family members being afraid. Our employees are staying home to help their family members move, to take care of them or to take them to see an attorney — that kind of thing.”

Dairy operations in several states have also been raided recently. Dairy producers say they rely on immigrant labor to provide a stable year-round work force and to keep the U.S. food supply stable.

“We need these people to take care of our animals so we can produce food. Without animal care, we won’t have milk, cheese, butter — nothing,” Greg Moes, MoDak Dairy in Goodwin, S.D., told Rook.

The recent ICE arrests at Glenn Valley Foods of Omaha, Neb. have also led to absenteeism at meat processing plants.

“At the beginning of the Trump administration, we had this same worry with the crackdown — whether this was going to impact absenteeism and things like that,” says Brad Kooima, Kooima Kooima Varilek in Sioux Center, Iowa. “So, hopefully we can put that in our rearview mirror.”

By the Numbers: A Heavy Reliance on Immigrant Labor
The news this week of the Trump administration putting a pause on raids of farms and meat processors is welcome news for those in agriculture. From dairies and produce farms, to meatpacking plants across the U.S., these sectors rely heavily on immigrant labor.

Immigrant labor makes up a substantial portion of the meat processing workforce, with estimates ranging from 37% to over 50%. However, states like South Dakota and Nebraska have even higher concentrations of immigrant workers in meat processing — reaching 58% and 66%, according to the nonprofit Migration Policy Institute.

And a large portion of U.S. dairy farms rely on immigrant labor, with estimates indicating that over half of all dairy workers are immigrants. Specifically, these workers account for 51% of the total dairy workforce and are responsible for producing 79% of the U.S. milk supply.

Farmworker Justice estimates 70% of the produce industry’s farmworkers are immigrants. USDA’s estimates are lower — closer to 60%.

A Sigh of Relief? Trump Orders Pause on ICE Raids of Farms, Meatpacking Plants

Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:58:52 GMT

President Donald Trump is reportedly ordering Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE ) to pause raids on farms and meatpacking plants, softening the potential blow to industries that rely heavily on immigrant labor. The news comes after a week of ICE seemingly targeting dairy farms, California produce farms and a meat packing plant in Nebraska.

New York Times first reported on Thursday Trump said he would issue an order soon to address the effects of his immigration crackdown on the country’s farm and hotel industries, which rely heavily on immigrant labor. According to reports, the new directive still allows for investigations into serious crimes such as human trafficking.

“We will follow the president’s direction and continue to work to get the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens off of America’s streets,” Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told “U.S. Farm Report” in a statement.

The Department of Homeland Security and top White House officials continue to say that ICE is targeting “criminals” and “criminal illegal aliens.” However, as more dairy farms and a meat production plant were targeted, that called into question if it’s just criminals ICE was targeting.

Recent Raids on Farms and Meatpacking Plants

The raid on Glenn Valley Foods, a meat production plant in Omaha, Neb., drew national attention. That raid is what the Department of Homeland Security called the “largest worksite enforcement operation” in the state during the Trump presidency.

Glenn Valley Foods was founded in 2009 by Gary Rohwer, and according to their website they sell steak, chicken and corned beef products to restaurants and grocery stores. Rohwer said he was surprised by the raid and had followed the rules regarding immigration status. The plant used E-Verify, a federal database used for checking employees’ immigration status. But the warrant by ICE officials that said they had identified 107-people who they believed were using fraudulent documents.

Congressman Don Bacon, R-Neb., told local media 75 to 80 people were detained, but four people were also arrested for assaulting ICE agents during the operation. Officials say an investigation is ongoing and additional arrests could be forthcoming, authorities said.

“While carrying out an enforcement operation in Omaha, Nebraska an illegal alien from Honduras threatened federal officers and agents with a box cutter. These are the type of threats and assaults our brave law enforcement face every day as they put their lives on the line to protect and defend the lives of American citizens,” McLauglin also said in a statement to Farm Journal. “Our ICE enforcement officers and agents are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them. Thankfully, no ICE law enforcement was hurt in this operation. The operation was successful and resulted in the arrest of 76 illegal aliens. This was the largest worksite enforcement operation in Nebraska under the Trump administration.”

It’s not just meatpacking plants that saw increased ICE presence last week. Immigration officials also continue to visit dairy farms across the country. There were reports of raids from South Dakota to New Mexico.

@HSIElPaso executed a search warrant at Outlook Dairy Farms in NM & arrested 11 illegal aliens for violations of fraud & misuse of visas, permits & other documents. 1 was previously removed from the US, 9 banned from the US. LeaCountySO HSILasCruces HSI Roswell #EROElPaso #WSE pic.twitter.com/PzLKBJIdQE
— HSI El Paso (@HSIElPaso) June 4, 2025

ICE shared a photo on X saying it executed a search warrant at “Outlook Dairy Farms” in Lovington, N.M. Officials say they arrested 11 people for violations of fraud and misuse of visas, permits and other documents, including nine who investigators say were already banned from the U.S.

The owner of the dairy farm told the Albuquerque Journal that the people arrested supplied him with false paperwork and that following an audit before the raid he’d been required to fire 24 other workers on the farm.

Worries were starting to mount as ICE raids ramped up on dairy farms, according to DairyHerd.com .

By the Numbers: A Heavy Reliance on Immigrant Labor

The news this week of the Trump administration putting a pause on raids of farms and meat processors is welcome news for those in agriculture. From dairies and produce farms, to meatpacking plants across the U.S., those are sectors that rely heavily on immigrant labor.

Immigrant labor makes up a substantial portion of the meat processing workforce, with estimates ranging from 37% to over 50%; however, states like South Dakota and Nebraska have even higher concentrations of immigrant workers in meat processing, reaching 58% and 66%, according to the nonprofit Migration Policy Institute

And a large portion of U.S. dairy farms rely on immigrant labor, with estimates indicating that over half of all dairy workers are immigrants. Specifically, these workers account for 51% of the total dairy workforce and are responsible for producing 79% of the U.S. milk supply.

Farmworker Justice estimates 70% of the produce industry’s farmworkers are immigrants. USDA’s estimates are lower, estimating that number is closer to 60%.

Ripple Effect of Immigration Crackdown

No matter the exact number, it’s clear agriculture- and the produce industry- relies on an immigrant workforce. According to an exclusive report by Farm Journal’s The Packer , the ripple effect of Trump’s immigration crackdown on agriculture could be far-reaching, if the administration revives its focus on ag.

Kevin Kelly is CEO of Emerald Packaging, which is the largest flexible packaging supplier to the leafy greens industry and based in Union City, Calif. The company has been in the packaging business for 62 years, and says the immigrant workforce in California is feeling uncertain and afraid.

“We’ve certainly heard that folks aren’t turning up to work in the fields, and we’ve seen it in our facility. And we verify everybody, so we know everybody in our facility is documented and can legally work in the United States,” Kelly tells Jennifer Strailey, editor of The Packer. “In our case, it’s brothers and sisters being deported, and other family members being afraid, and our employees staying home to help their family members move, to take care of them or to take them to see an attorney, that kind of thing.”

In an early morning raid, ICE agents are seen chasing farmworkers through an Oxnard field. The raids coming as the federal gov't ramps up immigration enforcement in SoCal. Continuing coverage of the ICE raids, protests and unrest - Tonight at 11 from ABC7. https://t.co/bSJpCk8byb pic.twitter.com/oQQismAu2j
— ABC7 Eyewitness News (@ABC7) June 11, 2025

He says there’s an irony taking place, as some of their employees voted for the current administration with the assumption only criminals would be targeted in an immigration crackdown. But he says “that’s clearly not what’s happening.” He says harvesting lettuce is back-breaking work, and it’s work that they can only find immigrant labor to do.

“We should be handing them gold stars, not throwing them out of the country,” Kelly says.

Kelly adds that half of the nation’s farm labor is undocumented. That includes electricians, plumbers and welders that the U.S. all relies on.

“And now it’s suddenly occurring to us that we rely on them?” he says.

The National Council of Agricultural Employers (NCAE), a national association focusing on agricultural labor issues from the employer’s viewpoint, recently sent a letter to the Trump administratio n.

“The Council and our members are encouraged by President Trump’s recent comments recognizing the critical importance of the agricultural workforce. His comments are spot on. After years of being subjected to pejorative policies that ignored the realities of rural America and often demonized those living and working in those communities, the President’s comments are a welcome change of pace: we must protect our Farmers,” NCAE stated in the letter.

NCAE also said “he success or failure of America’s hardworking farmers and ranchers largely depends upon their ability to find ready, willing, able, and qualified labor to help them complete the countless tasks it takes to grow food to feed the nation and the world.”

Why Can’t Congress Pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform

It’s evident immigration reform is a major issue for agriculture. No matter who you talk to in agriculture, if they use any part of the immigration system, they will tell you it’s broken.

With an inadequate immigration system in the U.S., why can’t it be fixed? According to agricultural economists surveyed in Farm Journal’s Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor , it’s too political.

One economist said, “Immigration reform is a huge issue for the U.S. economy and must be addressed. However, it is so politically sensitive that very few Senators or Congressmen are willing to push the issue.”

“Congress has a vested interest in keeping this issue unresolved in the current partisan environment,” said another economist.

“Getting anything started and passed in an election year will be tough, let alone something as confrontational as immigration,” was another economists’ response.

Greater border enforcement and mass deportations were two major pledges made by Trump as he campaigned to reclaim the White House. But as Congress continues to debate Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” immigration reform doesn’t seem to be on Congress’ near-term agenda.

Your Next Reads:

Bracing for Significant Disruption: Q&A with Emerald Packaging CEO Kevin Kelly in Wake of ICE Raids

Worries Mount as ICE Raids Ramp Up On Dairy Farms

U.S. Immigration Officials Raid Meat Production Plant in Omaha, Dozens Detained

Wed, 11 Jun 2025 12:07:01 GMT

An immigration raid on Tuesday at a meat production plant in Omaha, Nebraska was the “largest worksite enforcement operation” in the state during the Trump presidency, the Homeland Security Department said.

U.S. Congressman Don Bacon told local media 75-80 people were detained.

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid happened at a plant of Glenn Valley Foods. The food packaging company said it was surprised by the raid and had followed the rules regarding immigration status.

Chad Hartmann, president of Glenn Valley Foods in Omaha, said the plant that was raided used E-Verify, a federal database used for checking employees’ immigration status. He told Reuters that when he said this to a federal agent, the agent responded “the system is broken” and urged him to contact his local congressional representative.

ICE officers have been intensifying efforts in recent weeks to deliver on U.S. President Donald Trump’s promise of record-level deportations. The White House has demanded the agency sharply increase arrests of migrants in the U.S. illegally, sources have told Reuters.

Tensions boiled over in Los Angeles over the weekend when protesters took to the streets after ICE arrested migrants at Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse, according to migrant advocates.

Local police in Omaha said they were informed by immigration officials about the raid in advance while the company said it got no notice about the operation ahead of time.

Hartmann said federal agents had a warrant that said they had identified 107 people who they believed were using fraudulent documents.

“This was the largest worksite enforcement operation in Nebraska under the Trump Administration,” the Homeland Security Department said on X, adding no law enforcement official was hurt.

While carrying out an enforcement operation in Omaha, Nebraska an illegal alien from Honduras threated federal officers and agents with a box cutter.

These are the type of threats and assaults our brave law enforcement face every day as they put their lives on the line to… https://t.co/K6427agqlS
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) June 11, 2025

ICE said a criminal investigation was ongoing into what immigration officials called a large-scale employment of immigrants who are present in the U.S. illegally.

“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and federal law enforcement partners, executed a federal search warrant at Glenn Valley Foods, today, based on an ongoing criminal investigation into the large-scale employment of aliens without authorization to work in the United States,” an ICE spokesperson told an ABC News affiliate.

More than half of all meatpacking workers in the U.S. are immigrants, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a think tank.

Rights advocates, including the ACLU of Nebraska, condemned the raid.

(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington and Kristina Cooke in San Francisco; Editing by Michael Perry)

What To Do If ICE Comes Knocking On Your Door

Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:20:07 GMT

Immigration issues continue to be a significant concern for farmers nationwide, which means proactive measures and informed strategies are essential to minimize potential disruptions on the farm.

Understand the Immigration Enforcement Landscape
Due to resource constraints, comprehensive workforce roundups or enforcement actions are unlikely, with a primary focus on individuals engaged in criminal activities. In Idaho, for example, fewer than 20 field agents cover the state, and there are only 10 detention beds available, according to Rick Naerebout, CEO of Idaho’s Dairymen Association.

Individuals who lack a criminal record are often released after undergoing background checks while in custody, returning to their positions soon after detention, he adds. However, employing individuals with criminal backgrounds comes with the increased likelihood of an I-9 audit.

Proactive Strategies for Workplace Preparedness
To safeguard farms against unexpected ICE visits, Naerebout suggests the following proactive measures:

Designate private areas on your farm with clear signage, and ensure doors are locked to prevent unauthorized access.
Train employees to refrain from allowing ICE agents to enter or answering their questions. Instead, direct them to respond with, “I cannot give you permission. You must ask my employer.”
If an agent seeks entry into a private area during an ICE visit, farmers should verify a judicial warrant is in place and review its details closely for scope limitations.

“The administrative warrant is going to be issued by Homeland Security,” Naerebout shares. “The whole goal in this visit is to limit the amount of exposure to your facility, so limit the amount of exposure to your employees. You want to try and keep them as constrained and give them as little exposure to your facility as possible.”

Implement Effective Employee Communication and Record-Keeping
Jennifer Uranga from Mountain West Ag Consulting underscores the importance of clear communication and meticulous documentation. Often when ICE visits a farm, it’s to audit I-9s, search for specific individuals or conduct a raid with a warrant. Ensuring employees are aware of these procedures can alleviate stress and prevent absenteeism prompted by fears of ICE action.

Maintain an updated list of authorized personnel and contact information to share with employees, Uranga advises, thereby preparing them for regulatory visits without cultivating undue anxiety.

“Make employees comfortable with the fact ICE could show up on your farm. Any regulatory agency visit could make those workers nervous,” she says. “I think it’s so important to have a plan, talk to your employees and really be proactive in any of the I-9 employment paperwork process.”

I-9 forms must be complete and accurate given the legal obligation to retain the documents for each employee until a specified period of post-employment or hire date.

“Retain them until an employee is no longer working for the employer or three years after the date of hire or one year after the employee leaves, whichever is later,” she shares.

Farmers must remain vigilant and informed as they navigate the complexities of immigration enforcement. Developing comprehensive strategies can reduce risk and ensure farm operations proceed smoothly even amid potential ICE actions. As this landscape evolves, continued education and preparation are key to mitigate risks and maintain a stable workforce.

For further resources on the I-9 process, visit USCIS.gov/I-9 .

For more details on immigration, check out this State of the Pork Industry report:

Your Next Read: Rethinking the Term ‘Cheap Labor’ in the Dairy Industry

Trump Suggests Farmers Could Petition to Keep Workers Without Legal Status

Fri, 11 Apr 2025 14:29:25 GMT

U.S. President Donald Trump suggested on Thursday that farmers will be able to petition the federal government to retain some farmworkers in the U.S. illegally, provided the workers leave the country and return with legal status.

Trump’s comments during his Cabinet meeting are, though vague, the most detail the administration has provided on the fate of the nation’s farmworkers without legal status — who make up half the farm sector’s workforce — under his plan for mass deportations.

Farm industry groups have warned that deporting large numbers of agricultural workers would grind the food system to a halt. In addition to farming, many workers without legal status are also employed in the meat and dairy industries.

“We’re going to work with farmers that, if they have strong recommendations for their farms, for certain people, that we’re going to let them stay in for a while and work with the farmers and then come back and go through a process, a legal process. We have to take care of our farmers and hotels and various places where they need the people,” Trump said.

“A farmer will come in with a letter concerning certain people saying, they’re great, they’re working hard, we’re going to slow it down a little bit for them and then we’re going to ultimately bring them back. They’ll go out, they’re going to come back as legal workers,” he said.

The White House and the Department of Agriculture did not respond to requests to clarify the policy or when it will be implemented.

During his first administration, Trump promised the farm sector that deportations would not affect agricultural workers, but has made no such promise in this term.

Immigrant farmworkers prepared for the Trump administration by assigning guardians to their children in the case of their detention and taking other precautions.

(Reporting by Jeff Mason and Leah Douglas in Washington; Editing by Bill Berkrot)

30 Minutes With Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins In Her First Week On the Job

Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:14:00 GMT

Since Saturday, Nov. 23, 2024 , Brooke Rollins has been focused on how to build the teams and the plans that impact the trajectory of agriculture and rural America. On that day, while en route with her husband and four teenagers in their motor home to Auburn, Ala., for the Texas A&M football game, she got a call from now President Donald Trump. The purpose of his call: She was his top choice to fill his final significant cabinet position, Secretary of Agriculture.

Obviously, she had to wait for confirmation, which came last week on Feb.13 when the Senate overwhelmingly confirmed her as the 33^rd Secretary of Agriculture , but since that Saturday before Thanksgiving, she’s been on the go with an accelerated enthusiasm to understand the significant challenges facing rural communities that lost 147,000 family farms between 2017 and 2022 and why the cost of inputs are up 30% as exports are down $37 billion this year and likely to fall further in the months to come.

“This is a crisis, and this is something that I understand inherently,” Rollins said to kick off Top Producer Summit in Kansas City on Tuesday. “My promise to you is this, and my commitment will never waver, that every minute of every day for the next four years I will do everything within my power, with hopefully God’s hand on all of us and our work, to ensure we are not just entering the golden age for America, as my boss, President Trump, likes to say, but we are entering the golden age for agriculture.”

What Has Rollins Been Up to the Past Four Years?
Secretary Rollins and President Trump have worked together for almost eight years. She was in the West Wing with him for years two, three and four of his first term running his domestic policy agenda.

“This real estate guy from New York City brought that vision to life, and then in the last term, was able to really do some remarkable things,” Rollins said in regard to President Trump returning power to the people who just want a chance at the American dream. “I call it the great pause, the four years in between term one and term two. But I think the great pause allowed very intentional planning. It allowed a courageous and bold leader in President Trump to become a fearless leader and to do everything he can to bring America back to greatness.”

In the “dark days of January 2021,” as she described, Secretary Rollins helped launch the America First Policy Institute, a think tank established by former Trump officials to promote conservative policies. The idea was that those policies that made America great in Trump’s first term would continue indefinitely, not just for a second term, but for four years, eight years or 36 years, Rollins described.

First Week On the Job
Since being confirmed last week, Secretary Rollins has been in the Washington, D.C., USDA office for a few hours, but most of her time has been spent in Kentucky at National Farm Machinery Show in Louisville and Gallrein Farms and in Kansas visiting Finney’s County Feeder, High Plains Ponderosa Dairy and the National Beef Packing Plant .

Describing herself as “a reader and a studier,” Rollins seems adamant to hear firsthand from farmers and ranchers. She referenced her visits to the dairy farm and National Beef facility as inspiring, in a good way but also in a way that helps her understand the real challenges at hand.

Speaking to the crowd at Top Producer Summit, she shared her appreciation for the “entrepreneurial American game changers” who are doing their part to feed the world.

“It is so inspiring and a reminder of the very beginning of our country.” Rollins said. “Our revolution was fought by farmers, our Founding Fathers, like Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. The backbone of the great American experiment is this community.”

Thank you @topproducermag for hosting @RogerMarshallMD and me in Kansas City, Missouri, with 1,000 of the Top Producers from across the US to talk about issues like expanding trade access and cutting regulatory red tape for farmers.

Biden’s ZERO trade deals and inflationary… pic.twitter.com/ejMxKxkRMG
— Secretary Brooke Rollins (@SecRollins) February 19, 2025

Farmer Q&A
Watch and listen to what Secretary Rollins, as well as Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas, had to say on stage at Top Producer Summit about these 7 topics:

Trade and tariffs — “ Let’s go barnstorm the world , and let’s go find some more trade partners and access [to market opportunities],” Rollins said.
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) efforts and modernizing USDA — “DOGE is a very valid and important effort across all government. The stories of waste and abuse were really just, not USDA specific but across government, beginning,” Rollins said.
Federal programs, such as CSP and EQIP — “Our commitment is that if there have been commitments made, those will be honored. Getting our arms around all of that right now is really, really, important. Again, going back to the President’s heart and commitment to our farmers, I feel confident we will be able to solve any issues that are in front of our ag community, that are potentially being compromised by the DOGE effort, while at the same time recognizing how very, very important it is,” Rollins said.
Future of USDA — “There’s no question USDA needs some modernization. I’m just beginning to lean into that as well,” Rollins said. USDA has 106,000 employees and 29 departments. “The Secretary is taking over a department where only 6% of the [D.C.] people work in the office,” Marshall added.
Renewable fuels — Prior to President Trump’s first term, he was “the first major candidate to support biofuels, and I think that carried him through Iowa in many ways. … We’ve got E15 year-round. I think that gives us some certainty as well. … The President is supporting that. I think we’re trying to figure out how to save 45Z, but we can’t let China benefit from it. Right now, China is benefiting more from [45Z] than my farmers and ranchers are, so we’ve got to fix that,” Marshall says.
Immigration policies and availability of long-term labor — “I have a full-bodied understanding of the challenges within the labor market, and I believe the President does too. … I believe that we will very soon be talking about it again. Clearly, the H-2A program needs significant reform, and Lori Chavez-DeRemer, she’s going through the [confirmation] process right now. … Hopefully she’ll get her vote very soon. We’ve got a lot of work to do,” Rollins said.
Trump’s cabinet members — “Our cabinet is comprised of people that have been working together and have been friends and colleagues for years, with a few exceptions. Bobby Kennedy is a new friend, but Lee Zeldin and I worked together in America First Works and America First Policy Institute for the last almost four years, Linda McMahon in education and John Brooks — these are our people,” Rollins said.

5 Things You Need To Know About The H-2 Programs

Thu, 06 Feb 2025 22:07:11 GMT

As labor shortages persist in the ag industry, many farms might be looking at using the H-2A and H-2B programs. Megan Wright, senior director of business expansion at másLabor, recently joined an Ag Retailers Association (ARA) webinar to explain the key aspects you need to understand to be successful.

1. Know the Specific Type of Labor You Need
While it might seem obvious farmers would need seasonal, agricultural labor, it’s important to think through exactly what tasks those employees will be completing. This determines if you need to hire H-2A or H-2B labor.

“The H-2A program is designed for all temporary or seasonal agricultural labor needs. On the flip side of that coin, we have the H-2B program — that’s also temporary and/or seasonal but for non-agricultural labor needs,” Wright explains. “Maybe some of the job duties that you have labor needs for take place on on the farm, but heavy tractor trailer drivers would be construction workers, or maybe you need to build a new farm building. What if you have manufacturing-style job duties?”

The H-2A program is uncapped because agriculture is considered a matter of national security, but the H-2B program does have a finite number of visas available each fiscal year.

2. Start the Process Early
Once you’ve decided whether you need H-2A or H-2B workers, the legal process can start. Wright recommends beginning these conversations 180 days before labor is needed for the H-2B program and 120 days for the H-2A program.

“There are an infinite number of H-2A visas, and the filing process itself is also just shorter,” she says. “The true nuts and bolts again of the process takes 75 days in a normal scenario, and I say normal because first-time program users can actually qualify for what’s called an emergency filing at no extra cost. That allows us to shrink that down and have workers arrive in as little as 45 days.”

3. Prepare for Housing and Transportation Requirements
The H-2A program does require employers to provide free housing.

“We always recommend to think of housing solutions as the the first thing you do when considering the H-2A program,” Wright says.

And though the H-2B program doesn’t require housing, it can still be an opportunity to ease the process.

“We still have folks coming into the country, potentially for the first time, who wouldn’t know the first place to look for housing. As an employer, if you wanted to take that extra step to provide a housing solution for the H-2B workers, you would then be allowed to deduct rent. So, we actually do find that a lot of our employers go ahead and do that knowing that they can recoup funds spent again through those payroll deductions.”

Travel expenses are another area some employers might be surprised by. That’s because it encompasses more than just the gas or plane fees.

“Both H-2A and H-2B employers are responsible for inbound and outbound travel, aka getting them from their front door to your front door and then back home again at the end of the contract period. I think what some folks tend to forget is that this isn’t just the literal transportation itself. It also includes a daily sustenance. It also includes potential motel stays,” Wright explains.

4. Be Willing to Hire Domestic Labor Also
If you want to hire international employees, you must be open to hiring domestic ones as well, according to the U.S. Department of Labor.

“The U.S. Department of Labor is in charge of the certifying process, and they’re clearly going to want to make sure that we’re not discriminating against U.S. workers by participating in these programs. You have to engage in positive U.S. recruitment,” Wright says. “As an employer, you need to be willing to hire a qualified, willing, available and able U.S. or domestic worker.”

The U.S. worker would need to have your minimum skill requirements and agree to the terms of the H-2 contract.

“If they come to you and they meet those requirements during this overall approval process, you absolutely have to interview them, and in that case, you would have to hire them on as well,” Wright says.

5. Stay Informed on President Donald Trump’s Immigration Reform Policies
Because H-2 workers have a lawful presence in the U.S., Trump’s deportation policies should not apply to them.

“It’s always important to note that Trump himself participates in both H-2 programs at Mar-a-Lago and at the Trump winery in Virginia,” Wright says. “But there might be misunderstandings, and there might be miscommunications. We might need to keep in mind that law enforcement may not be familiar with the H-2 programs overall.”

She recommends these best practices for avoiding any discrepancies with H-2 employees and law enforcement:

1. Your workers should have possession of copies of their legal documents, their passport, their visa, and are carrying those copies with them — especially if they leave the work site.
2. Make sure they have an emergency contact who can be reached at all times.
3. Create a document explaining the employee’s legal status in the U.S. and their rights (másLabor has these available).

From Early Executive Orders to Delaying Tariffs Against China, Here's What to Expect as Trump Takes Office

Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:49:41 GMT

This week is mostly about President Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 47th president, with a flurry of executive orders and illegal immigrant deportations expected soon.

President Donald Trump and Senator JD Vance were sworn into office inside the Capitol Rotunda, avoiding the dangerously cold temperatures forecast for Washington, D.C. The entire ceremony, including prayers and speeches, will take place indoors, according to Trump’s announcement on Truth Social.

This marks the first indoor inauguration due to weather since Ronald Reagan’s second term in 1985, and the second such event in history, following James Monroe’s indoor inauguration due to a snowstorm.

Mexico’s Slim and Cervantes to Attend Inauguration; Sheinbaum Left Out

Billionaire Carlos Slim, Mexico’s wealthiest man with a net worth nearing $100 billion, will attend Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 47th president of the United States in Washington, D.C. He will be joined by Francisco Cervantes, president of Mexico’s influential Business Coordinating Council (CCE), who confirmed plans to begin talks with high-ranking U.S. officials during the event.

Notably absent from the invitation list is Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Mexico will be officially represented by Ambassador Esteban Moctezuma. The Trump administration’s policies, including a planned 25% tariff on Mexican exports and mass deportation operations, are expected to pose significant challenges to Mexico.

Slim expressed confidence that the Mexican economy would navigate these challenges effectively, emphasizing its complementary relationship with the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, Sheinbaum’s government has signaled readiness to implement reciprocal tariffs and address deportation logistics if needed.

World leaders, including Argentina’s Javier Milei and El Salvador’s Nayib Bukele, are also set to make history by attending a U.S. presidential inauguration.

Early Executive Orders: A Preview

Stephen Miller, Trump’s top domestic policy adviser, briefed Republican lawmakers Sunday on an ambitious slate of executive orders planned for the early days of the administration. These orders, many of which Trump had campaigned on, will focus on government reform, energy policy, and immigration. While details remain fluid, key areas discussed:

Government reform: Streamlining federal hiring and dismissal processes, targeting DEI initiatives, and reforming rules for Schedule F employees.
Energy policy: Halting climate-related spending, accelerating energy infrastructure projects, expanding drilling — including in the Arctic — and repealing electric vehicle mandates. Also: declare a national emergency related to energy.
Immigration: Declaring cartels as terrorist organizations, reinstating strict border policies like “Remain in Mexico,” declare an emergency at the U.S./Mexico border, which will allow Trump to deploy military forces to the border, and ending “catch and release.”

Miller cautioned that these orders are still under development, with specific details yet to be finalized. Miller, a key architect of Trump’s immigration policies, is expected to play a significant role in shaping and implementing these executive orders. Miller’s involvement suggests a continuation of the hardline approach to immigration that characterized Trump’s first term.

Trump to Delay Tariffs on China, Signals Shift Toward Negotiation

President-elect Donald Trump is not expected to impose China-specific tariffs on his first day in office, signaling a strategic shift toward engagement with Beijing rather than reigniting a trade war.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the decision reflects Trump’s desire to begin his second term in a negotiating mode, with hopes of striking a new deal with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

During his first term, Trump brokered a “Phase 1” trade deal with China, but many of Beijing’s commitments to purchase U.S. goods were not fully realized. While plans are underway for a memorandum directing federal agencies to review trade policies with China, Canada, and Mexico, the approach appears more measured than the aggressive tariff rhetoric from Trump’s campaign.

However, sources caution that Trump’s strategy could shift, given his history of abrupt decisions. His swearing-in ceremony is scheduled for midday Monday in Washington.

Trump to Declare National Energy Emergency to Boost Domestic Production

President-elect Donald Trump will declare a national energy emergency after his inauguration on Monday to lower energy costs, an incoming White House official announced.

The emergency declaration is expected to “unlock a variety of different authorities” to enhance natural resource production, though specific measures were not disclosed.

The official emphasized the importance of energy independence in the context of the U.S./China AI race, highlighting the need for domestic energy to power advanced technology. Additionally, Trump plans to sign an executive order to accelerate energy production in Alaska, citing its geostrategic significance and potential for LNG exports to the Asia-Pacific region.

Focus on Deregulation

President-elect Donald Trump plans to start one of the most sweeping deregulatory drives in U.S. history. Border czar Tom Homan says the incoming administration is assessing plans to launch post-inauguration immigration raids in Chicago after plans leaked in news reports about plans for a large-scale immigration raid in Chicago Tuesday.

Trump has outlined a sweeping array of 31 major policy initiatives for his second term, according to the Washington Post. These include moves on immigration, such as mass deportations, reinstating a travel ban, and ending birthright citizenship. He also plans significant economic shifts, like imposing high tariffs on imports, cutting taxes, and promoting cryptocurrency. The list, according to the WaPo:

1. Immigration

Mass Deportations: Pledges to implement the largest deportation operation in U.S. history, including undocumented workers.
‘Remain in Mexico’ Program: Plans to reinstate policies requiring asylum seekers to wait in Mexico.
Travel Ban: Intends to reimpose restrictions on travelers from several majority-Muslim countries.
Birthright Citizenship: Proposes ending automatic citizenship for children of noncitizens.
Punish Sanctuary Cities: Plans to cut federal funding to cities refusing to cooperate with deportations.
Death Penalty for Migrants: Advocates for automatic death sentences for migrants who kill U.S. citizens.
Border Wall: Plans to complete construction of the U.S./Mexico border wall.

2. Economy

Tariffs: Proposes imposing tariffs on all imports and higher rates on goods from China, Mexico, and Canada.
Inflation: Vows to lower prices, including energy and gas costs.
Tax Cuts: Promises extensive tax reductions, potentially adding to the national debt.
Eliminate Taxes on Tips and Overtime: Suggests removing taxes on certain income sources.
Cryptocurrency: Aims to make the U.S. a global leader in cryptocurrency by adopting industry-friendly policies.

3. Education

Abolish Education Department: Proposes dismantling the department, redirecting its responsibilities elsewhere.
Punish Schools Over Content: Plans to cut federal funding for schools promoting “critical race theory” or “radical gender ideology.”
Transgender Policies: Seeks to ban trans athletes from women’s sports and revoke inclusive school policies.
School Vouchers: Advocates for taxpayer-funded school-choice programs.

4. Environment

Rollback of Regulations: Plans to remove policies addressing climate change and protecting species.
Oil and Gas Expansion: Proposes increasing domestic production and exports of fossil fuels.
Paris Climate Agreement: Intends to withdraw the U.S. from this global pact.

5. Healthcare

Lower Costs: Pledges to reduce healthcare and prescription drug expenses.
Preserve Social Security and Medicare: Promises to maintain these programs while cutting waste.
Abortion Laws: Plans to leave decisions on abortion to state legislatures.
Free IVF: Proposes covering in vitro fertilization costs.

6. Democracy and Governance

Retaliation Against Rivals: Suggests acting against political enemies and media outlets.
Reshape Federal Workforce: Plans mass job cuts, reduce union power, and make civil servants “at-will” employees.
Voting Requirements: Proposes stricter voter ID and citizenship proof, ending mail-in and early voting.
Pardon Jan. 6 Defendants: Pledges to pardon individuals charged in the Capitol riot.

7. Defense and Foreign Policy

Isolationism: Advocates for “America First” policies, including shutting out imports and withdrawing from international conflicts.
End Wars in Ukraine and Middle East: Claims he would end these conflicts quickly, potentially conceding to adversaries.
Military Diversity Policies: Plans to reverse diversity initiatives and restrict women in combat roles.
Strike Mexican Cartels: Proposes military action against cartels operating in Mexico.

These policies reflect significant shifts across numerous domains and have raised concerns about their feasibility and broader implications.

It’s also key to note Trump will meet with House and Senate GOP leadership at the White House on Tuesday.

Vance, Han Discuss Trade and Fentanyl Ahead of Inauguration

Vice President-elect JD Vance met with Chinese Vice President Han Zheng in Washington to discuss trade and the fentanyl crisis, a day before Donald Trump’s second presidential inauguration.

The meeting follows a call on Friday between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, which addressed similar topics, including TikTok. Han is expected to attend Monday’s inaugural ceremony, relocated indoors due to subfreezing temperatures in the capital. it will be the first time a high-ranking Chinese official attends a U.S. presidential inauguration. The Vance/Han meeting represents the most substantial individual engagement for Vance since securing his election victory alongside Trump last year.

Of note: Han also met billionaire Elon Musk and other U.S. business figures, underscoring Beijing’s efforts to set a positive tone in ties with the US before President-elect Donald Trump returns to office.

TikTok Returns After Brief U.S. Shutdown Amid Uncertainty

TikTok has reappeared in the United States following a temporary shutdown that began late Saturday night, Jan. 18. The app was blocked due to a federal law mandating that its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, divest its U.S. operations. Service began to be restored on Sunday, January 19, driven by two key developments: (1) President-elect Donald Trump’s intervention: Trump announced plans to issue an executive order on his inauguration day, Jan.20, to delay the ban’s implementation.

He emphasized the need for negotiations to protect national security and suggested the possibility of a joint venture granting the U.S. a 50% ownership stake in TikTok’s operations. (2) TikTok’s agreement with service providers: TikTok confirmed service restoration through agreements with its service providers.

The company thanked President-elect Trump for providing “necessary clarity and assurance.” While the app is back online, its future remains uncertain, contingent on the Trump administration’s actions and potential negotiations with ByteDance.

Biden Issues Pre-emptive Pardons on Final Day in Office

Outgoing President Joe Biden issued pardons to members and staff of the Jan. 6 select committee. including GOP Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming, Adam Kinzinger of Illinois; and Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), as well as police officers who testified before it.

The pardons also extended to Gen. Mark Milley, former chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

In a statement, Biden emphasized that the pardons “should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that any individual engaged in any wrongdoing.”

Your Next Read:

Treasury Nominee Bessent Defends Trump Policies in Testimony; Promises to Press China to Resume Ag Purchases in Phase 1 Agreement

What The Trump Administration's Mass Deportation Plans Could Mean for Agriculture

Mon, 23 Dec 2024 17:39:39 GMT

Farmers and food industry leaders are warning that President-elect Donad Trump’s plans to deport millions of immigrants could devastate agriculture — an industry in which immigrants make up a good chunk of the workforce.

Nearly half of all farmworkers are undocumented, and industries such as dairy and meatpacking plants are especially vulnerable to labor shortages.

“Admittedly, there are some people who slip through,” says Scott VanderWal, vice president of the American Farm Bureau Federation. “Perspective employers are required to take documentation that appears to be legal and valid. There are times when that’s not the case and then ICE [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] comes in and cleans house, the workers disappear and go wherever they take them and the employers are left without help.”

While the H-2A visa program has grown, it only covers seasonal work and cannot replace year-round jobs at meat processing plants and on dairy and pork farms.

“Our packing plants need labor. Many of our farms use temporary visa labor — educated, skilled individuals work on our sow farms,” says Lori Stevemer, president of the National Pork Producers Council. “We have been experiencing an increased number of denials over the past year, which really makes it a challenge to find workers. The H-2A visa doesn’t work well when we have animals that need care 24/7, year-round.”

Experts say mass deportations would disrupt food production, raise prices and jeopardize the stability of U.S. agriculture.

Deportation falls under the Department of Homeland Security. President-elect Trump has selected South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem to lead that agency.

“With Governor Noem at the helm, she’s going to bring common sense to that discussion and make sure we don’t close businesses, make sure we get everyone in line, get the workforce in line and then make sure we’re following our country’s rules,” says Hunter Roberts, secretary of South Dakota’s Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

Meanwhile, farm groups continue to urge for reforms to immigration policies or a guest worker program to secure a stable workforce.

“At the same time as controlling the border, we need to overhaul our labor system,” VanderWal says. “We need to make H-2A apply to your own workers or come up with a decent program that will help.”

We need some type of H-2A visa reform to allow those workers to stay year-round, Stevemer adds.

Even then immigration is likely to continue to be a political hot potato in 2025, and labor shortages will continue to top the list of challenges for agriculture.

Judge Blocks Rule Allowing H-2A Workers to Unionize in 17 States

Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:13:19 GMT

A ruling by a federal judge has blocked the enforcement of a U.S. Dept. of Labor (DOL) rule designed to protect H-2A farmworkers from retaliation related to union organizing in 17 states.

The decision was made by U.S. District Judge Lisa Godbey Wood, who found the rule unconstitutional because it conflicted with the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by granting collective bargaining rights to farmworkers, a right that Congress has not legislated for under the H-2A program.

The blocked rule was part of a broader effort by the DOL to enhance protections for farmworkers under the H-2A visa program. This program allows U.S. employers to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary agricultural jobs. The rule aimed to prevent employers from retaliating against workers who engage in activities related to self-organization or other concerted activities concerning wages or working conditions.

Judge Wood’s ruling specifically restricts the enforcement of this rule in the states that were part of the lawsuit, which include Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. The judge argued that the DOL overstepped its authority by creating rights not granted by Congress, effectively acting beyond its constitutional powers.

Bottom line:
The ruling affects agricultural employers’ compliance costs by potentially reducing the immediate financial and administrative burdens associated with the blocked provisions. While the ruling alleviates some immediate compliance burdens, agricultural employers must still navigate the complexities of the H-2A program.

CoBank Releases Labor and Economic Report

Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:16:37 GMT

The potential for a workforce shortage looms as large, long-term problem for the U.S. economy, according to Cobank who shared findings from its new quarterly report . In addition, the shifting views on immigration paired with an aging U.S. population and falling birth rates has the potential to create a declining and ultimately insufficient labor supply, a company release stated.

“Due to the sharp decline in U.S. birth rates since the global financial crisis, we are poised to enter a long, potentially permanent period in which the number of retirees will outpace the number of native-born workers entering the labor force,” said Rob Fox, director of CoBank’s Knowledge Exchange. “And the declining supply of workers will drive wages higher causing inflation and hurting our overall global competitiveness.”

While the U.S. economy continues to perform reasonably well by most metrics, the labor market of the last two years seems to be slowing. Unemployment rates edged up to just above 4% in June and has risen 0.7% since January 2023. An increase in the unemployment rate of 0.5% over a one-year period has historically triggered a recession, however the recent uptick is highly unlikely to produce a similar result. It is more reflective of the labor market returning to its historical norms following a period of extreme tightness, according to the Cobank release.

Immigration policy affects the agriculture industry in multiple ways as many farm laborers are not native born.

In recent national polls, immigration has surfaced as a greatest issue than the economy, according to Cobank. A set of more moderate federal policies that allows for a steady flow of legal immigration will likely be the only way to maintain a stable labor force, but the current bitterly divided political environment may prevent that outcome.

Steady decline in job growth also presents concerns for the U.S. economy. Monthly job openings have dropped by more than one-third since mid-2022. While employers have not stopped hiring, they are beginning to take a more cautious approach. Any further weakening in labor demand could trigger an additional slowdown in hiring and economic growth.

The agricultural sector continues to face economic headwinds. Increased crop acreage in the U.S. and rising production in South America have pulled grain and oilseed prices lower. Elevated farming costs are also contributing to sharply lower row crop profitability. Livestock producers will fare relatively better, but also face headwinds from the strong U.S. dollar and increasing trade challenges.

Animal Protein & Dairy

As expected, U.S. beef production is in decline for the year. But it is not falling as fast as once projected. Cattle spent extra days on feed during the second quarter, resulting in carcass weights averaging 10 pounds heavier than Q1. Profits in the value chain have transitioned away from beef to cattle, softening packer margins and boosting revenues for producers and feedlots.

Soft feed prices and firm hog values have bolstered profitability among pork producers. Improved processor demand and strong wholesale cutout prices led to a prolonged stretch of elevated hog prices. An uptick in consumer demand for value-based protein appears to be supporting retail pork sales. U.S. pork exports comprised 31% of all pork produced during the first four months of 2024, a record high.

Chicken continues to be the default protein choice for consumers seeking nutrition, convenience and value. The U.S. broiler industry is hitting those marks in stride with consumer-friendly prices and innovative new offerings designed for quick and easy meal preparation. Broiler integrator margins are improving as markets heat up and input prices fall.

U.S. milk production fell for the 11th straight month in May. However, combined butterfat and protein production posted steady gains over the same 11-month period. Low cheese prices on the spot CME market boosted international sales. U.S. cheese exports exceeded 100 million pounds in March, a record high for one month, and then again in April and May. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza continues to affect cows in at least a dozen states. Until a vaccine reaches the market, the dairy industry is facing lower milk output from affected herds.

Grains, Farm Supply & Biofuels

The USDA recently reported higher-than-expected totals on corn acreage and stocks, which should provide a buffer against any losses from recent flooding in key growing regions. Corn prices ended the quarter 11.5% lower. Soybean crush continues to reach record highs, but record imports of canola, tallow and used cooking oil have softened soybean oil prices and weakened crush margins. The U.S. wheat harvest is moving at a fast clip with farmers reporting much better yields than last year’s crop.

Farmers entered the 2024 growing season with higher financing needs to cover elevated input costs. In June, USDA forecasted crop production costs would remain relatively stable through 2025, while crop prices have dropped considerably since 2022. Sustained high fertilizer prices amid lower new crop values may push some farmers to delay fall applications and additional purchases.

Lower corn and natural gas prices have helped boost ethanol production margins. Domestic ethanol demand has tracked lower in recent months, in tandem with flagging gasoline demand. However, export channels offer promising demand for U.S. ethanol with Canada emerging as the top new market.

11 Key Takeaways From Biden's State Of The Union Address

Fri, 08 Mar 2024 19:58:42 GMT

President Joe Biden delivered a defiant argument for a second term in his State of the Union speech Thursday night. Biden fired multiple broadsides at Trump without ever mentioning him by name.

From the economy to Biden’s thoughts on infrastructure, the border and climate, there were several key takeaways from Biden’s State of the Union address. He led his address with Ukraine, Jan. 6, abortion and the state of the U.S. economy.

Ukraine. Biden accused “my predecessor” of “bowing down” to Russian President Vladimir Putin, saying it is “outrageous, it is dangerous and it is unacceptable.” Biden called for funding Ukraine in its war against Russia. Biden warned that Russia’s aggression would “not stop at Ukraine.”
The U.S. will build a pier on the Gaza coast to receive humanitarian aid, including food. “Tonight, I’m directing the U.S. military to lead an emergency mission to establish a temporary pier in the Mediterranean on the Gaza coast that can receive large ships carrying food, water, medicine and temporary shelters,” Biden said. “No U.S. boots will be on the ground. This temporary pier would enable a massive increase in the amount of humanitarian assistance getting into Gaza every day.” Biden added, “But Israel must also do its part. Israel must allow more aid into Gaza and ensure that humanitarian workers aren’t caught in the crossfire. …Humanitarian assistance cannot be a secondary consideration or a bargaining chip.” The Biden administration has said Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu isn’t doing enough to allow the flow of humanitarian assistance into Gaza. Biden stressed the need for a temporary cease-fire and called for hostages to be released.
Shrinkflation. Called on Congress to pass a bill sponsored by Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.) to stop “shrinkflation” in food packages. “Too many corporations raise their prices to pad their profits charging you more and more for less and less. That’s why we’re cracking down on corporations that engage in price gouging or deceptive pricing from food to health care to housing,” Biden said. “In fact, snack companies think you won’t notice when they charge you just as much for the same size bag but with fewer chips in it,” he added.
High-speed affordable internet. Biden said his policies are “providing affordable high-speed internet for every American no matter where you live. Urban, suburban, and rural communities — in red states and blue states. Record investments in tribal communities.”
Farm sector. Biden said: “Because of my investments, family farms are better able to stay in the family and children and grandchildren won’t have to leave home to make a living. It’s transformative.” He added, “Because of my investments in the family farm led by my secretary of Agriculture who knows more about this than anybody I know, we’re better able to stay on those farms so their children and grandchildren won’t have to leave home, leave home to make a living. It’s transformative.”
Border. Biden said he “will not demonize immigrants saying they ‘poison the blood of our country’ as he said in his own words,” referencing his “predecessor” without naming Donald Trump. Biden continued, “Unlike my predecessor, on my first day in office I introduced a comprehensive plan to fix our immigration system, secure the border, and provide a pathway to citizenship for Dreamers and so much more… We can fight about the border, or we can fix it. I’m ready to fix it. Send me the border bill now!” Biden rebuked Republicans for opposing a bipartisan border agreement in the Senate. Trump has opposed the measure, calling it a “gift” to Democrats in an election year. Biden called on Republicans to work with him. “We can fight about fixing the border, or we can fix it,” he said. Biden has been weighing executive action on immigration, but has yet to make such a move.
Climate. Biden said, “We are also making history by confronting the climate crisis, not denying it… I’m taking the most significant action on climate ever in the history of the world. I am cutting our carbon emissions in half by 2030,” he said.
Infrastructure. Biden knocked Republicans for touting the flood of cash that has been funneled into their districts from bills that they opposed, such as the infrastructure law. “If any of you don’t want that money in your district, just let me know,” Biden said.
China. Biden said, “Our trade deficit with China is down to the lowest point in over a decade. We’re standing up against China’s unfair economic practices. We want competition with China, but not conflict.”
Manufacturing. “Where is it written that we can’t be the manufacturing capital of the world? We are. We will. Instead of importing foreign products and exporting American jobs, we’re exporting American products and creating American jobs - right here in America where they belong. And thanks to our CHIPS and Science Act, the United States is investing more in research and development than ever before. It takes time, but the American people are beginning to feel it.”
Taxes. Biden said he wants to raise the minimum tax for multinational corporations to 21%, as well as lift the corporate tax rate to 28% from the current 21%. The president also hopes to:

Stop letting corporations get tax deductions for all employee salaries over $1 million (the current rule applies only to C-suite pay) and make it harder for companies to write off executives’ private jet travel.
Raise the tax on corporate stock buybacks from 1% to 4% to encourage companies to spend more of their revenue on salaries and improving productivity.
Make billionaires pay a minimum of 25% income tax.

Bottom line:

Biden’s SOTU address was clearly his effort to begin the national presidential re-election campaign. He directly referenced his age at times. “I’ve been told I’m too old,” he said as he concluded his speech. “Whether young or old, I’ve always known what endures… The issue facing our nation isn’t how old we are,” he said. “It’s how old are our ideas.”

Reaction:

As with most things related to our nation’s capital, responses primarily fell across political lines. Biden proponents and much of the media characterized the speech as “feisty.” The speech amounted to a general election preview, referring to former President Donald Trump 13 times only as “my predecessor.” Biden opponents thought his address was “angry” with no real message of bipartisanship. Trump responded to the speech in real time on his Truth Social site, defending himself and blasting Biden for what he said “may be the Angriest, Least Compassionate, and Worst State of the Union Speech ever made.”

Will Border Security Issues Force Congress To Take Action On Immigration Reform? Ag Economists Say It's Unlikely

Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:45:25 GMT

The debate over immigration and border policies continues to be a point of contention in Washington. With a renewed push by the GOP to address illegal border crossings, and the White House emphasizing the need to allocate more than $13 billion to manage the increase of migrants into the U.S., the topic as at the forefront of policy discussion once again. However, ag economists are still skeptical immigration reform will finally see movement in Washington.

In the October Ag Economists’ Monthly Monitor, a survey of nearly 70 ag economists from across the U.S., economists were asked if they expected to see any movement on immigration reform in 2024. Nearly 83% of respondents said no. Just over 8% said yes, with the remaining economists, or just over 8%, unsure about the outcome in 2024.

Of the overwhelming number of economists who said they don’t think Congress will move on immigration reform in 2024, the reasons included:

Election year in 2024 will stall potential legislation, although it might be a focus during campaigns.
Political gridlock and competing priorities make a bipartisan solution unlikely, especially with a sensitive issue like immigration reform.

The biggest hurdle, according to respondents, is the fact it’s an election year, as well as how controversial the issue is. One economist even called it “politically unpopular.”

“Congress has a vested interest in keeping this issue unresolved in the current partisan environment,” responded an economist in the latest survey.

Another economist said, “Getting anything started and passed in an election year will be tough, let alone something as confrontational as immigration.”

A different economist in the October survey said immigration reform won’t happen because, “Too many other issues to happen first. Congress and the administration are too far apart to find an acceptable resolution. Legislators don’t have the fortitude to address it.”

However, one economist who thinks Congress may address immigration reform in 2024 said their response is due to the fact that “Right to Shelter will be rescinded in certain major cities that have reached the breaking point.”

It’s evident immigration reform is a major issue for agriculture. One economist said, “Immigration reform is a huge issue for the U.S. economy and MUST be addressed. However, it is so politically sensitive that very few Senators or Congressmen are willing to push the issue.”

Ag Labor Void

The survey also asked economists if they thought U.S. agriculture will be able to utilize the influx of immigrants at the southern border to fill the void in ag labor. While the feedback was mixed, most were not confident due to mismatched skills and what they called ‘noise’ in the system. Other economists indicated that some of that labor could possibly be used, particularly for specialty crops like fruits and vegetables.

“The ‘immigration problem’ at the Mexican border is a humanitarian problem, as well as an immigration issue,” said one economist. “Many of the new immigrants entering at the Mexican border are being moved to the East or West Coast. It will be hard for ag to access this potential workforce.”

What Will It Take for Congress to Take Action on Immigration Reform?

As the issue continues to draw criticism and debate, economists were asked: what’s the one thing that would need to happen in order for Congress to take action on immigration reform in the next couple of years? While sentiments were largely pessimistic on any action, some economists think increased pressure from labor markets could prompt Congress to take action.

One economist said “cooler minds” is what it would take for Congress to find compromise.

“A perceived crisis where both parties can agree on a solution. In other words, a very unlikely situation,” said another economist.

Another economist said, “Elect smart people.” While one economist in the anonymous survey said, “One part would need to gain total control.”

Another economist thinks the only way to find a solution is to, “Separate ag labor from broader immigration discussion.”

A Bipartisan Issue?

According to Farm Journal Washington correspondent Jim Wiesemeyer, Republicans are currently pushing for changes in immigration policies aimed at deterring illegal border crossings. He says they want to address border security issues and make it more difficult for migrants to enter the U.S. without proper documentation.

At the same time, Wiesemeyer reports Democrats, including President Joe Biden, emphasize the need to allocate $13.6 billion to manage the increasing number of migrant arrivals. They argue that this funding is essential to address the current challenges at the border.

“The debate over immigration is causing tensions in Congress, particularly as it relates to funding for Ukraine and other foreign aid initiatives. There is a risk that disagreements over immigration policies could lead to delays or the derailment of government spending and aid packages,” reports Wiesemeyer.

He also points out that Democrats are facing pressure to compromise on immigration, with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) pledging to link a substantial border package to aid for Ukraine. He says Senate Republicans are also seeking to incorporate policy changes in an emergency funding discussion with some Republicans advocating for bipartisan efforts to address border security.

“They are proposing changes to asylum policies, including raising the bar for ‘credible fear’ claims and reinstating the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy for asylum-seekers,” says Wiesemeyer.

He also reports key Democrats are opposed to Republican demands on immigration policy changes, as they doubt the possibility of reaching a workable middle ground during time-sensitive funding negotiations. But some Democratic lawmakers, such as Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), express a willingness to address border security issues but reject “draconian” policy ideas that could harm migrants. They seek more humane solutions.

Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Gary Peters (D-Mich.) urged colleagues to focus on measures that already have bipartisan support, such as increasing the number of border patrol agents and Customs and Border Protection officers, which align with President Biden’s request. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) indicated a willingness to consider any bipartisan border proposal put forward by the Senate.

New rule aims to give H-2A workers new protections

Wed, 13 Sep 2023 16:01:53 GMT

H-2A workers would receive new protections under a proposal from the Department of Labor .

The proposed new rule would strengthen protections for farmworkers in the H-2A program and help prevent abuses that undermine wages and standards for all agricultural workers, according to the agency.

“Farm workers are vital to our farmers, our food supply and our communities,” acting Labor Secretary Julie Su said in a news release. “This proposed rule would strengthen protections for H-2A farm workers who are particularly vulnerable to labor abuses, empower them to advocate for fair treatment and ensure that their employment does not depress labor standards and undercut domestic farm workers. The administration is committed to protecting all workers, and this proposal would significantly advance that effort.”

This proposal builds on a final rule the department published in October 2022 that modernized key aspects of the H-2A program . If implemented, this new rule would improve workers’ ability to advocate for better working conditions by expanding and clarifying existing anti-retaliation protections, according to the release.

The proposed rule would also expand workers’ rights to invite and accept guests — including labor organizations — to employer-provided housing. Additionally, for workers not protected by the National Labor Relations Act, the proposed rule would require employers to provide a list of workers to a requesting labor organization, permit workers to designate a representative to attend any meeting between a worker and the employer where the worker reasonably believes that the meeting may lead to discipline, and prohibit employers from holding captive audience meetings unless the employer provides certain information to ensure that such meetings are not coercive, the release said.

The proposal would also create greater transparency for workers about their prospective employers’ stance on their right to organize freely and without interference by requiring employers seeking to hire H-2A workers to provide a certification to the Department of Labor that the employer will bargain in good faith over the terms of a proposed labor neutrality agreement with a requesting labor organization or will explain why they will not do so, according to the release.

The proposed rule would clarify that an employer only terminates a worker for cause when the worker either fails to meet pre-specified productivity standards or fails to comply with employer policies after the employer applies a system of progressive discipline, the release said. The proposal would establish six conditions to terminate a worker for cause, including that the employee has been informed of, or reasonably should have known, the employer’s policy, rule or productivity standards.

Clarifying the meaning of the term for cause in existing regulations is important because termination for cause generally strips affected workers of their right to be offered work hours of at least three-quarters of the contract period and the right to outbound transportation, according to the release. For U.S. workers, termination for cause also strips them of their right to be contacted for employment in the subsequent year, the release said.

The proposal would also make foreign labor recruitment more transparent, the release said. In line with concerns expressed by workers’ rights and anti-trafficking organizations, the Government Accountability Office and the department’s Office of Inspector General, the department has found that increased transparency is necessary to help protect agricultural workers from predatory practices during the recruitment process, the release said.

The proposed rule would require employers to provide a copy of all agreements with any agent or recruiter the employer engages in recruiting prospective H-2A workers to the department, regardless of whether the agent is in the U.S. or abroad. The proposed rule would also require employers to identify and disclose the name and location of anyone soliciting H-2A workers on their behalf, the release said.

The proposed rule would make wages more predictable in the H-2A program by making new wage rates applicable immediately upon their publication in the Federal Register rather than weeks later, the release said. “This will ensure that agriculture workers are paid the most up-to-date wages as soon as possible,” the Labor Department said in the release.

The rule would also require employers who fail to provide adequate notice to workers of a delay in their start date to pay workers the applicable rate for each day that work is delayed for up to 14 days, the release said. The proposal would further require enhanced transparency for employers to communicate minimum productivity standards, applicable wage rates, overtime opportunities and delayed start dates to workers.

The proposal also seeks to improve workers’ access to safe transportation, including seat belts. Workers in the H-2A program often travel long distances to and from the worksite in crowded vans and buses, sometimes driven by workers who worked all day, raising grave concerns about transportation safety . The proposed rule would add a seat belt requirement to reduce these hazards. For vehicles that are required by the Department of Transportation to be manufactured with seat belts, the proposed rule would prohibit the use of any employer-provided vehicle to transport H-2A workers unless each occupant is wearing a seat belt before the vehicle is operated, except in specific circumstances, the release said.

Another goal of the proposal, the agency said, is enhancing enforcement to improve program integrity. The proposed rule would increase the speed with which the debarment of any business that violates H-2A program rules becomes effective by streamlining deadlines for Office of Foreign Labor Certification integrity and Wage and Hour Division enforcement actions. The proposed rule would also make it easier for the workforce system to discontinue necessary recruitment services for employers who have failed to meet program requirements, the release said.

Finally, the proposed rule would prohibit employers from holding or confiscating a worker’s passport, visa or other immigration or government identification documents.

Upon publication in the Federal Register, the notice of proposed rulemaking will be open for public comment for 60 days . The department said it will consider all comments received before publishing a final rule.

Four Ag Topics Discussed in Mexico City During USMCA Meetings

Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:40:59 GMT

Mexico City ran the headlines this week, as Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador hosted President Biden and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for the 10th North American Leaders’ Summit.

In their Tuesday meeting, the three leaders shared a conversation including these top takeaways for the ag industry:

1. Semiconductor manufacturing

The three agreed to organize a semiconductor forum with industry representatives and government officials in early 2023 to coordinate semiconductor supply chain needs and investments. Semiconductor companies building new manufacturing facilities in the U.S. would like to put parts of their supply chain in Mexico.

Read more: What to Watch in 2023

2. Methane and food waste reduction

The countries also committed to reducing methane emissions from the solid waste and wastewater sector by at least 15% by 2030 compared with 2020 levels, and to develop a proposal to cut food loss and waste in half by 2030.

3. Energy

Biden, López and Trudeau agreed to create a plan for standards and installation of electric vehicle chargers along their international borders.

The energy topic comes as Mexican officials are in consultations with the U.S. to avoid a U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) dispute panel over Mexican energy policy. Canada has also joined in the complaint.

The U.S. Trade Representative’s office says the policy puts billions of dollars in U.S. investments at risk.

Canada also has concerns over the implementation of an electric-vehicle provision in the Inflation Reduction Act signed by Biden last year.

While Trudeau did not elaborate on his concerns, Biden said Trudeau has “always been there” when he reached out. With that, Biden intends to travel to Canada to discuss the matter in March.

Read more: Title 42 Talks Continue with Biden at U.S./Mexico Border

4. U.S./Mexico Border Wall

Biden, in the meeting, was met with thanks from López Obrador for not building “even one meter of wall.”

“You are the first president of the United States in a very long time who has not built even one meter of wall. We thank you for that, sir,” said López Obrador.

The comments come as the Biden administration announced a program to allow 30,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, collectively, to enter the U.S. legally each month.

Still, López Obrador suggested Biden “insist” Congress regularize undocumented Mexican migrants who work in industries where American employers are struggling mightily to find enough workers.

By the end of the discussion, López Obrador labeled Biden as “a man with conviction.” López Obrador then moved to challenge Biden to improve life across the region, telling him he “holds the key” to change.

“This is the moment for us to determine to do away with this abandonment, this disdain and this forgetfulness for Latin America and the Caribbean,” López Obrador said.

While López Obrador and Biden reserved a moment for a border wall discussion, no commentary was shared regarding GMO corn trade .

Read more: Mexico’s GMO Corn Debate Tabled Until 2025, According to Mexico

Title 42 Talks Continue with Biden at U.S./Mexico Border

Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:30:32 GMT

President Biden traveled on Sunday to the U.S./Mexico border amid a surge in illegal border crossings. The president went to El Paso, Texas, which in December saw a surge of migration. His first stop was at the Bridge of the Americas Port of Entry, where the president toured the facility with border officials. He then stopped along the border fence that separates El Paso from Juárez, Mexico where he visited the El Paso County Migrant Services Support Center.

“They need a lot of resources. We’re going to get it for them,” Biden told reporters.

To the dismay of some Democrats and immigration advocates, his plans rely on the resumption or expansion of several Trump-era policies that Biden has previously decried, including Title 42, the pandemic-era border measure that allows migrants seeking asylum to be quickly turned away. Biden was greeted at the airport by Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas defended the president’s policies to reporters on Air Force One Sunday, saying the goal is to “incentivize a safe and orderly way and cut out the smuggling organizations.” He said Biden was traveling to the border because “he made a decision to see what the challenges are and to see how we responded to those challenges down in El Paso.”

The administration said last week it would use Title 42 to rapidly expel asylum seekers from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela, the countries whose migrants have posed the greatest challenge to the U.S. in the past year. It is taking the step even as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments on the legality of Title 42 and the administration has argued that the measure is no longer justified on public-health grounds and must end.

The administration announced a new program for up to 30,000 migrants a month combined from the four countries to enter the U.S. legally. In the coming weeks, the administration plans to adopt an updated version of a different Trump-era policy known as the transit ban, which would make migrants at the border ineligible for asylum if they didn’t first seek protection in another country, such as Mexico, on their way to the U.S.

More on policy:

Kevin McCarthy Finally Won the House Speaker Gavel, Now What?
What Is Ahead for the Future of Global Grain Flow?

DC Signal to Noise: Immigration and Infrastructure Heat Up

Mon, 20 Sep 2021 22:03:06 GMT

Pro Farmer policy analyst Jim Wiesemeyer and AgriTalk host Chip Flory discuss many topics including the situation at the southern border with Haitians and others trying to immigrate to the United States, the latest on the battle over the infrastructure bill(s), and more.

Watch the video above or listen to the podcast below for discussion on these topics and more:

Farm Bureau Urges Biden to Address Border Crisis, Says Farm Families' Lives At Risk

Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:02:27 GMT

The situation at the southern border continues to be an issue for farmers and ranchers, and agricultural groups are now calling on President Biden to do more.

Dangerous border crossings continue to be an issue for those with land adjacent to the border. Just last week, U.S. Border Patrol agents took more than 160 undocumented immigrants into custody within 24 hours in two human smuggling attempts in Laredo, Texas. That included finding 50 people inside a tanker trailer.

The American Farm Bureau Federation, along with all 50 state Farm Bureaus and Puerto Rico, sent a letter to the Biden Administration asking for help. The letter says the increase in undocumented immigration is severely impacting farm and ranch families, putting property and personal safety at risk.

Farm Bureau says landowners are seeing their fences cut, crops destroyed, water sources compromised and vandalism. The group is asking the federal government to provide additional resources to secure the border.

House to Take Up Second Bill to Revise H-2A Worker Program

Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:49:34 GMT

The House has already passed, for the second time, a sweeping reform of the H-2A guestworker program which would allow a year-round workforce and provide a path to citizenship for farmworkers. That measure, the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, however, faces unlikely odds in the Senate.

House Agriculture Committee Member Cong. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.) sees problems with the bill and has introduced his own plan to rework H-2A, the Agricultural Guest Worker Reform Initiative (AGRI) Act.

Crawford outlined his objections to the Farm Workforce Modernization Act on the AgriTalk Radio Show with Chip Flory.

“There are some issues there that just don’t really get to the heart of the matter in terms of streamlining and making the H-2A program more workable, more affordable,” Crawford told Flory. “And then the other issue is this - Essentially we’re setting up amnesty where you’ve got to be in the country and demonstrate having worked on the farm for 150 days or something like that, and that would qualify you for citizenship. We need to discard the assumption that everybody that comes to the United States to work in the agriculture field is here because they want to be a citizen. That’s not necessarily true. And in many cases, they’re here simply because they’re trying to earn money and send it back home, and they can find the employment here to do that.”

One key difference of the AGRI Act is that it transfers administration of the H-2A program from the Department of Labor to the Department of Agriculture. Under the bill, farmers would be able to enroll at a local Farm Service Agency office.

Crawford said both farm owners and workers need a better foreign workforce program that provides for year-round employees and is more affordable.

“It’s hard to get it right,” Crawford said on AgriTalk. “We feel like the AGRI Act come as close to getting it right as anything we’ve seen thus far in terms of trying to make the program affordable, trying to make it easier for employers to comply, easier for employees to comply, provide the incentives necessary on both counts to actually engage in the program, do it aboveboard. The last thing we want to do is create an environment where we are forcing employers to hire off the books and employees to work off the books. That doesn’t help us at all. In fact, it creates more problems, because it denies citizens the revenue associated with the labor that every other worker has to pay.”

The proposed expansion of H-2A is welcomed by many in the livestock industry such as Washington state dairy producer Dwayne Faber.

“For us in dairy, we have work 365 days a year, and so this new iteration which allows them to come for 10 months and then one month back in their home country, I think that is a nod to dairy. And we appreciate that in the dairy industry,” Faber said on AgriTalk. “We want to be aboveboard. And quite frankly, for an 18-year-old, 19-year-old kid that can come to America and work for three years, build up some savings and then go back to his country. That individual’s set for life, just about. They can have a paid off house going back to Mexico, right? Just with the currency exchange. And that’s fantastic.”

A decision on the H-2A program will determine where and how U.S. consumers get their food, according to Minnesota Farm Bureau President Kevin Paap.

“We’ve got to realize the facts are the facts. We’ve got immigrant farmworkers that play a vital role in feeding all Americans,” Paap told Flory on AgriTalk. “We’ve got a current, qualified, hardworking, experienced and unauthorized workforce, so I think we have to ask ourselves the question, do we want to import our labor or import our foods?”

Trump Brings Border Wall Fight To AFBF, Promises Ag Labor Solution

Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:20:18 GMT

President Donald Trump brought his fight to build a border wall to the 100^th American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) annual meeting in New Orleans, La., on Monday. There, the president found support for border security and received a standing ovation when he promised to address ag labor concerns.

“We’re going to have a barrier. We’re going to have something that’s going to be very strong,” Trump said to a standing crowd of 7,000 farmers.

In December, 20,000 migrant children were illegally brought across our borders, said Trump, adding “most of the drugs” in the U.S. enter via the southern border. According to Trump, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and border patrol agents are asking for a wall and America must provide them the tools necessary to do their jobs well.

“As president, the defense of our nation is my highest and most important duty, and this is the defense of our nation,” he said. “I will never ever back down.”

Trump invited Arizona rancher Jim Chilton on stage to say a few words. Chilton’s ranch, which sits along the U.S.-Mexico border, is on the route for a major Mexican drug trafficking cartel.

“Mr. President, we need a wall,” said Chilton to a standing ovation. He thinks a wall is necessary to stop drug traffickers from importing drugs that “poison our people.”

Directing his comments to Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, Chilton said: “Walls are not immoral. The biggest wall I’ve ever seen is around the Vatican.”

Addressing the concern of many in the agricultural industry, Trump promised immigration reform, which would make it easier for farmers to source immigrant labor.

“We want to take people in to help our farmers,” he said. “We’re going to make it easier for them because you need these people.”

The cheers of the farmers in attendance made it clear they support President Trump’s border wall and his promises of immigration reform.

Touching On Trade

President Trump briefly mentioned trade during his one-hour talk, touching on a potential trade deal with the European Union, the trade war with China and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

“I don’t blame China,” he said, adding it’s our leaders’ fault for allowing the theft of intellectual property to happen. “Over the past 15 years, we’ve seen a continual decline in the U.S. share of agricultural trade all throughout the world. You know it’s all going in the wrong direction when you see that happen. We do the right deal with the Chinese—you’re talking about massive [improvement].”

Trump added China is already “backordering” products from the U.S. While export data is not available during the ongoing government shutdown, previous data shows China is purchasing soybeans, but at a very slow rate.

“We want a fair deal for American farmers, removing China’s arbitrary bans on agricultural imports to safeguard our intellectual property and providing fair market access to all American producers,” he said.

Trump also touted opening markets for pork exports to Argentina, poultry exports to India and Morocco, potato exports to Japan and beef exports to Brazil and China.

In addition, the president said he made history by replacing the “horrible” North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with USMCA. That deal has yet to be approved by Congress.

Overviewing The Wins

While addressing Farm Bureau members, President Trump gave an overview of his ag policy scorecard, mentioning several subjects that received standing ovations from the crowd. Those included tax reform, the repeal of the Waters of the U.S. rule, the “virtual elimination” of the estate tax, an increase in farm income and the passage of the farm bill.

Senate Votes To Reopen the Government

Fri, 20 Nov 2020 05:08:37 GMT

The Senate voted to reopen the government on Monday, the third day of the shutdown. Under the bill, the government will be open until February 8.

“McConnell and I have ‘come to an arrangement,’” Sen. Chuck Shumer says.

That ‘agreement’ was a commitment from GOP leaders to immediately consider immigration legislation on the floor if no immigration agreement is reached by February 8, according to ProFarmer’s Washington policy analyst, Jim Wiesemeyer.

“Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) promised to take up an immigration bill that would protect an estimated 800,000 Dreamers from deportation, under an open amendment process, if Democrats would agree to end the government shutdown,” he says.

The House also has to vote to end the shutdown, but it is widely expected they will by the end of the day. The Dow hit an all-time high on news the Senate reached a deal to reopen the government.

House Rejects Immigration Bill After GOP Fails to Reach Agreement

Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:07:23 GMT

(Bloomberg) -- House Republicans fell far short on their second attempt to pass a GOP-only immigration bill, notching one more failure on President Donald Trump’s signature issue just months before they try to defend their majority in midterm elections.

The attempt to come up with legislation that would appeal to moderate and conservative Republicans failed, 121 to 301. The defeat of the legislation, which even its backers anticipated, capped more than a month of intense GOP negotiations that played out amid public backlash against immigrant families being separated at the border because of Trump administration policy.

The failure vividly illustrates House Speaker Paul Ryan’s inability to get a fractious GOP House majority together on a broad immigration proposal, even one that would have accomplished many of President Donald Trump’s policy priorities.

With less than five months before all House members will be up for re-election, conservatives will have to explain to voters why they still haven’t funded Trump’s border wall, and moderates will go home empty handed on their promise to give immigrants brought to the U.S. as children a path to citizenship.

Trump Tweets

Trump on Wednesday urged Republicans in the House to pass the immigration bill, in an all-caps tweet, even after he wrote last week that members of his party were wasting their time.

“HOUSE REPUBLICANS SHOULD PASS THE STRONG BUT FAIR IMMIGRATION BILL,” Trump wrote in his Twitter message.

The administration also released a formal policy statement saying the White House backed the legislation.

With the bill’s rejection, House members will now turn their attention to a much more narrow proposal to write a law that would keep undocumented parents and children together when they’re apprehended crossing the U.S. border.

Since Trump initiated his “zero tolerance” policy of detaining everyone who enters the U.S. illegally, more than 2,000 immigrant children have been separated from their parents. After an outcry from the public and lawmakers, Trump last week signed an executive order to end the separations but said Congress needs to change the law.

Some families have been reunited as the federal government works to comply with a federal judge’s order to reunite immigrant children who were separated from their families at border crossings and to stop detaining parents without their children.

Detaining Minors

The broader bill that failed Wednesday includes two provisions to address this issue: changes to the 1997 Flores court settlement that limits how long minors can be detained, and a requirement for families to be held together in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security. It also would have redirected $7 billion for border technology to build more family detention centers.

Cathy McMorris Rodgers, a Washington state representative who is chairwoman of the Republican conference, plans to introduce a bill designed to pass quickly and prevent immigrant families from being separated. GOP leaders have been tight-lipped about her proposal to avoid draining support from the broader Republican measure that failed Wednesday.

“I dont like the fact that was raised as a possibility in some ways that would undermine our effort,” Carlos Curbelo, a Florida Republican who represents a diverse district, said in reference to a more narrow bill. Still, Curbelo said, “a lot of good has come” from the past few weeks of intense discussion of immigration policy.

The foundation of McMorris Rodger’s bill could be the proposal introduced by North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis that would put aside the 1997 court decision that had the practical effect of requiring children to be released from detention after 20 days.

That legislation would also give priority to timely consideration of cases involving families, and authorize 225 new immigration judges. Trump, however, said that he opposes adding any more immigration judges.

Democrats in both chambers oppose simply voiding the 21-year-old settlement because it also contained standards for facilities and treatment of children who are detained. Steny Hoyer, the second-ranking House Democrat, said the next proposal must be focused solely on keeping families together if it is to get any support from the minority party.

“If it includes repealing the Flores restrictions, I think the answer to that is maybe no,” Hoyer said. “If it just says, ‘look, we’re not going to separate children at the border,’ then I think we’d be for it.”

Ryan characterized the Democrats’ position as “catch and release” for immigrants apprehended at the border and said Congress shouldn’t have to choose between policies that “separate families or secure the border.”

“We should be able to keep families together and secure the border and enforce our laws,” Ryan told reporters.”

Mark Meadows, a North Carolina Republican who is chairman of the conservative Freedom Caucus, introduced his own version of a bill that would not only allow families to be detained together, but would also change the standard for asylum applications.

Congress doesn’t have much time to act on legislation to end family separations. Thursday is the last day the House is in session until July 10, and then there are only three weeks before a month-long August recess when members will be back in their districts campaigning for re-election.

It’s unclear how long Trump’s executive order, which relies on judicial action to change legal precedents, will guide administration policy on how to detain immigrants who cross the border illegally with their children.

Yet the title of the president’s action makes its true intent clear: “Executive Order Affording Congress an Opportunity to Address Family Separation.”

©2018 Bloomberg L.P.

Trump Pledges Guestworker Program For Ag

Thu, 19 Nov 2020 03:04:48 GMT

While President Trump has received some criticism from the farm community for his harsh words on immigration, Ray Starling, special assistant to the president on agriculture, says the president understands agriculture’s need for access to a reliable labor force and will make it a priority to help fix the issue.

“This is an area that we’re working in and particularly for our Aggies,” Starling says. “This is a challenge for us and for the president, to stand up at a rally and say ‘Look we want agriculture to have access to their workers. We understand it is a limiting economic issue for them.’”

Last week at a campaign rally in Michigan, president Trump said he knows agriculture needs guest workers.

“For the farmers, OK, it’s going to get good, and we’re going to let your guest workers come in because we’re going to have strong borders, but we have to have your workers come in,” Trump said in Washington, Mich. “Guest workers. Don’t we agree? We have to have them. We have to have them.”

According to Starling, the Trump Administration intends to make progress on a guest worker program that would help relieve the pressure on farmers.

“Some of that progress will be left up to the Hill, and may be bound up in a bigger conversation about immigration reform,” he says. “But for ag what I’ve been gratified to see both here in the White House and across the administration, and frankly out in the public as well, is that folks understand we have a special need. They understand that particularly with some of these visa programs, we have workers that come in lawfully. They are law abiding. They are paid a fair wage and then at the end of their visa term they return to their home country.”

President Trump’s main concern is that foreign workers come to the U.S. lawfully.

“To the extent that we have to have a program and access labor from outside the United States, that’s the way we want to do it,” he explains. “In an orderly, lawful fashion that gets the farmers what they need, protects the workers and maintains our national security.”

Grassley Immigration Plan: Trump Support, But No H-2A Fix

Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:59:31 GMT

This week, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Ia.) introduced an immigration bill, and President Trump is throwing his support behind it.

The plan includes what Trump has outlined as four pillars: a “lasting solution” for the children of immigrants called Dreamers who are living in the U.S. illegally, building a border wall, reforming family-based immigration, and getting rid of the diversity visa lottery.

Trump is urging both parties to back the bill, saying in a statement, “I am asking all senators…to oppose any legislation that fails to fulfill these four pillars—that includes opposing any short-term ‘Band-Aid’ approach.”

As for how Grassley’s bill will impact agriculture, it does not include changes to the current H-2A program or a provision to move the ag guest worker oversight to the USDA.

“Nothing in this bill deals with a change of legal immigration, so consequently that will come on the second round of immigration debate,” he said in a press conference.

Grassley believes the bill can be signed Thursday night.

Grassley Immigration Plan: Trump Support, But No H-2A Fix

Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:09:47 GMT