Ag Retailers Association

Trade Associations Urge Biden Administration To Act Now To End Port Strike

Thu, 03 Oct 2024 18:11:32 GMT

A coalition of over 270 local, state and federal trade associations have signed a letter urging President Biden and his administration to use all of its authorities to end the port strike, get the ports open and get the parties back to the negotiating table.

Click here to read the full letter.

The associations involved represent:

American manufacturers
Farmers and agribusinesses
Wholesalers
Retailers
Restaurants
Importers
Exporters
Distributors
Transportation and logistics providers
Additional supply chain stakeholders

The Ag Retailers Association (ARA) is among the groups who sent the letter and is encouraging members to let them know how the strike will impact their businesses.

Background:
A port strike along the East and Gulf coasts began on Oct. 1 and will halt the flow of a wide range of goods, potentially leading to shortages and higher costs. According to an estimate from the Anderson Economic Group, a one week strike would cost the U.S. economy about $2.1 billion.

Your Next Read: East and Gulf Coast Dockworkers Now on Strike Over Wage Demands, Halting Key U.S. Cargo Shipments

This Farm Bill Discussion Should Be About Policy, Less About Politics

Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:52:02 GMT

Hunter Carpenter from the Agricultural Retailers Association shares a bit more about the timing of the pending Farm Bill deadline and how in 2018 even getting the bill done 4 months late is now considered “on time.”

The 2018 Farm Bill is set to expire at the end of September. When Congress resumes, their top two priorities will have to be met before the Farm Bill becomes a priority.

“We have a government shutdown looming at the end of September should they not get the funding bills done,” Carpenter says. “So, first and foremost, the top priorities are to keep the government open and to pass appropriations bills.”

Carpenter isn’t optimistic the Farm Bill will be addressed by its deadline.

“I think the expiration is pretty imminent, and it looks like we’re going to see the end of September come and go without the 2023 Farm Bill being passed. There’s just probably not enough legislative days on the calendar to get something done in time, although stranger things have happened,” he says.

Most recently the 2018 Farm Bill was extended by four months to receive its passage. That year Hunter says having a single part in the House, Senate and White House (Republicans) helped with its timeline.

“Now with a much more divided Congress and administration, it’s going to be tough to get it across the finish line by the end of September,” he says. “There are a lot of different ideas and thoughts about when a farm bill could get done whether they do an extension and kick it into 2024 or if they try to get something done by the end of the calendar year–I think that’s yet to be seen.”

What happens it he Farm Bill expires?

“The good news is a lot of the permanent funding in the Farm Bill will keep programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Benefits program– SNAP benefits–open. Crop insurance payments are done on the calendar year basis, not on the Farm Bill expiration date, so people will still be getting payments for commodities and other farm related services. So conservation programs will still be kept open,” Carpenter says.

But he says into 2024, funding becomes unclear and complicated.

“The problem is this Farm Bill has been more about spending and less about actual policy. It’s going to put us behind the eight ball moving forward to get things done. As you know, the government shutdown looms and that could play a whole other role in the process,” Carpenter says.

He adds, “We really have been pushing for this Farm Bill discussion to be more about policy and less about politics.”

Senate Ag Committee Approves Vilsack Confirmation for USDA

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 06:26:30 GMT

Tom Vilsack enjoyed bipartisan support in his Senate Agriculture Committee confirmation hearing Tuesday as he seeks to return to USDA. The committee voted unanimously to recommend his confirmation as USDA Secretary to the full Senate.

Vilsack noted the unusual date of his confirmation hearing paired with his return to the agency he helmed for all eight years of Barrack Obama’s administration.

“It’s not lost on me, ironically, that this is Groundhog’s Day, and I realized that I’m back again,” Vilsack observed. “But I also realized that this is a fundamentally different time, and I am a different person, and it is a different department, and I think we have to recognize that going into this process.”

Vilsack appeared via video conference following COVID-19 restrictions, and the hearing was jointly chaired by Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and John Boozman (R-Ark.) as the Senate has not yet approved rules for operating under a 50-50 split.

Vilsack addressed a broad range of issues during the hearing from coronavirus and climate change to Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) and biofuels. Following are key quotes from Vilsack from the hearing on key agricultural issues:

Coronavirus recovery: “Clearly, COVID is on the minds of everyone, as it should be, and the Department of Agriculture has responsibility to aggressively promote the nutrition assistance that you all have provided, and they have begun to do that in the last week, 10 days. We also have to review the additional relief that’s been ordered by Congress and try to get that into the hands of farmers, ranchers, producers and those in rural America as quickly, as efficiently, as effectively as possible. We need to make sure that our workers are essential workers on the line in the farm fields in processing facilities and alike are protected and recognized as the essential workers they are. And we certainly need to work collaboratively with Congress and others to build back the real economy in better shape than it was before the COVID crisis.”

Addressing climate change: Vilsack said a number of climate priorities included in a bill sponsored by Stabenow and Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) could be implemented administratively.

“For example, putting together an advisory group of farmers that would give us a better understanding and appreciation of how to structure a carbon sequestration or carbon bank effort, making sure that we can, in fact, accurately measure and quantify the results that can be obtained by farmers. Making sure that the benefits of whatever program we devise and develop accrue to the benefit of farmers and not necessarily to third parties. Making sure that we promote the development of ecosystem markets to create those revenue sources for farmers. Making sure that our conservation programs are structured and designed in a way that encourage and incent the kinds of activities we know make a difference. Our soil is precious, we need to make sure we’re investing in soil health, and we also frankly need to up our game on research. There are ways in which root systems of crops can potentially be designed in a way that will sequester more carbon. We ought to be exploring that, we ought to be looking at ways in which we can increase market opportunities for greater storage. I think agriculture is probably the first and best way to begin getting some wins in this climate area. I think, farmers are prepared for it, farmers are anxious to do it, if it’s voluntary, if it’s market based, if it’s incentive based. I think you will see farmers, ranchers and producers cooperate extensively.”

On discrimination and equity of access: “We need to fully, deeply and completely address the long standing inequities, unfairness and discrimination that has been the history of USDA programs for far too long to a future where all are treated equitably and fairly, where there is zero tolerance for discrimination, where programs actually open up opportunity for all who need help and lift the burden of persistent poverty for those most in need.”

On using the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) to fund climate initiatives: “The first responsibility of the Commodity Credit Corporation is to make sure that the Farm Bill programs are adequately, fully and kindly funded. Having said that, to the extent that that vehicle is available without compromising the ability to fund the Farm Bill programs, it is a great tool for us to create the kind of structure that will inform future farm bills about what will encourage carbon sequestration, what will encourage precision agriculture, what will encourage soil health and regenerative agricultural practices. And to that extent to the extent that there are resources available, I would hope that you all would provide me the opportunity to utilize that in a way, again, that doesn’t compromise the Farm Bill programs, but advances and creates additional markets. Secretary Purdue had great flexibility, appropriately so, under the current COVID situation, I would ask for the opportunity to use that flexibility appropriately, effectively and smartly to create the opportunity for you as you put together the next farm bill to understand what works and what would be helpful in terms of programs.”

Biofuels: “We need to have the USDA Secretary work closely with his or her partner at EPA to make sure that folks at EPA fully understand or appreciate the benefits of this industry in terms of jobs, in terms of the environment, in terms of lifecycle analysis. This industry has made great strides in becoming much more environmentally friendly than it was at the beginning, and sometimes I fear that we were still working off of old research. New research would indicate that this is an industry that is providing environmental benefits: cleaner air, for example. And making sure that as they make decisions relative to the Renewable Fuel Standard that they are consistent, that they are consistent with the rule, they’re consistent with the law. The waiver system was designed for small refineries that were having trouble and difficulty. It was not designed for large scale refineries that are owned by Exxon and Chevron to receive a waiver. So I would hope, and will certainly strongly urge EPA to go back to a day when those waivers are very, very, very infrequently granted. And then finally I think there’s a way in which we can utilize USDA resources, and work with Congress to increase those resources, to build out the infrastructure to make it easier for higher blends to be available to consumers. Why? Because at the end of the day, consumers benefit. They have less expensive fuel, they have a cleaner burning fuel, they have a fuel that’s better for the environment.”

On Coronavirus Food Assistance Program funds currently being reviewed by the administration: “I hope that you understand and appreciate the fact that any new administration needs to have an opportunity to fully understand or appreciate exactly what is taking place with reference to what commitments have been made, what commitments have already been embraced. We just simply need time to have a better understanding of where that is. It is not designed for anything other than to give me, if I’m confirmed, a better sense of that program. Obviously, we’re going to follow the directives of Congress, I mean that’s reasonable and appropriate and that’s the way it should operate. I would say that we are going to continue to look for ways in which the tools that USDA has can be utilized in the best possible way to provide the assistance that people need to help build the economy back better, to expand opportunities when and if that presents itself, but if there’s directive from Congress will obviously follow it.”

Livestock price transparency: “There’s no question we need to strengthen the laws that are designed to create more openness and more transparency and more price discovery. No question about that. But that’s not enough. I think we need alternative processing opportunities, not just from the competitive standpoint but also from a resilience standpoint. We found that when one or two processing facilities shut down during COVID, that it just created havoc in the market. We can’t have that. We have to have a more resilient food system and that, in my view, requires us to look at ways in which we can incent and encourage more processing facilities.”

On Country of Origin Labeling: “We [the Obama Administration] made every concerted effort to try to create better transparency, better information for consumers, because we understand and appreciate that consumers want to know where their food comes from. They want to know when they’re buying U.S. or when they’re buying something from someplace else. We attempted on three occasions to sort of strengthen the Country of Origin Labeling, unsuccessfully because of the WTO challenges by our Canadian friends, which would have resulted obviously in retaliation. I am absolutely willing to listen to anybody and everybody who’s got an idea about how we can circumvent, or how we can get to a point where the WTO doesn’t necessarily slap it down. That creates retaliatory impacts on American agriculture. I’m frank to say I need help in that respect. We can ignore the WTO, but then we’ve got the retaliation and then, you know, that’s just not a good thing.”

Scandal-Plagued EPA Administrator Pruitt Resigns

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:33:43 GMT

By ZEKE MILLER, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he has accepted the resignation of scandal-plagued Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt.

Pruitt had become a constant source of embarrassment to a president who had entered Washington promising to “Drain the Swamp.”
Pruitt has faced an array of ethical questions about his travel spending, security costs, dealings with industry lobbyists and misuse of government resources.

He had denied wrongdoing in the face of multiple congressional and oversight inquiries.
Despite the scandals, Trump has been approving of Pruitt’s efforts to reduce regulations that the administration says curb business growth. Trump writes on Twitter, “Within the Agency Scott has done an outstanding job.”
Activists have argued those cuts have endangered the environment.

Trump tweets that Deputy Administrator Andrew Wheeler will assume the acting administrator position Monday.

Comment Period Extended For FMCSA Younger Truck Driver Pilot Program

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:33:10 GMT

Submit comments on the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) potential pilot program that would allow 18-20-year-old drivers to operate commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce. Comments are due on or before Aug. 14.

ARA has made it easy for you to send comments in support of the pilot program because we believe it will be a great opportunity for younger drivers to gain training in operating CMVs in the private sector while also filling a growing need for drivers among agricultural retailers and distributors.

Specifically, FMCSA is requesting comments on the training, qualifications, driving limitations, and vehicle safety systems that should be taken into consideration when developing a potential second pilot program for younger drivers without military experience.

Click here to send your comments to the FMCSA before they close on the new deadline of Aug. 14!

Agriculture Industry Praises Senate Passage of USMCA

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:32:45 GMT

The Senate on Thursday passed the U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA) in a landfall vote of 89-10. As expected, the agriculture industry praised the passage and looks forward to President Donald Trump signing the bill into law.

“We’ve long waited for this day and now USMCA will finally head to the President’s desk,” Agriculture Secretary Perdue said in a statement. “The passage of USMCA is great news for America’s farmers and ranchers. With Congressional consideration now complete, our farmers and ranchers are eager to see the President sign this legislation and begin reaping the benefits of this critical agreement. I thank President Trump and Ambassador Lighthizer for successfully delivering an improved and modern trade agreement and working so hard for the people of American agriculture to get this deal across the finish line.”

Farmers of all commodities are thrilled at the passage of the deal which for many was their top legislative priority.

National Corn Growers Association president and Iowa farmer Kevin Ross thanked U.S. senators who voted to ensure corn farmers will have access to Mexico and Canada.

“Nearly a year ago, NCGA’s farmer members, recognizing the importance of our trading relationship with Mexico and Canada, declared passage of USMCA their top legislative priority,” he said in a statement. “Since that time, corn farmers have been using every opportunity to urge members of Congress to support the new trade agreement and we are incredibly thankful for the strong bipartisan support it has received in the Senate today.”

Wheat farmers say the deal creates new opportunities for many farmers and is likely to fix the price of wheat.

“Trade deals can put the price of wheat back on track for many growers and create new opportunities for many farmers,” said National Association of Wheat Growers President and Lavon, Tex., farmer Ben Scholz. “NAWG applauds the U.S. Senate for moving quickly on passing USMCA out of the Chamber.”

Mexico is the top importing country of U.S. wheat, according to U.S. Wheat Associates chairman and Paulding, Ohio, farmer Doug Goyings. “Wheat farmers are relieved to see the agreement moving on to the President and I think the Mexican millers who want our wheat are relieved, too,” he said in a statement.

The agreement is also critical for beef, lamb, pork and poultry producers.

“The U.S. meat and poultry industry exports $5.5 billion annually in products to Canada and Mexico,” said American Meat Institute president and CEO Julie Anna Potts. “This agreement is critical to meat and poultry processors and the millions of U.S. farmers, ranchers, allied manufacturers and transportation companies in the food supply chain

Similarly, U.S. Meat Export Federation (USMEF) President and CEO Dan Halstrom said in a statement that today’s Senate approval reaffirms the America’s commitment to two key trading partners which are critical destinations for pork, beef and lamb.

“USMEF applauds Congressional leaders and the Trump administration, especially the trade experts within USTR and USDA, for their tireless efforts to ratify USMCA, which bolsters our position as a reliable supplier to two leading markets that account for about one-third of all U.S. red meat exports,” he said. “Shipments to Mexico and Canada in 2019 totaled about 1.25 million metric tons valued at $3.8 billion, and the U.S. red meat industry looks forward to many years of further growth.”

National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) President Jennifer Houston said this deal secures duty free access for American beef into Canada and Mexico.

“NCBA has been a strong supporter of USMCA since day one, and we believe that today’s vote sends a strong message to the rest of the world that the United States believes in free and fair trade,” she said in a statement. “We are thankful to every Member of Congress in both House and Senate who voted for USMCA, and we thank President Trump for continuing to secure and defend strong market access for America’s cattlemen and cattlewomen.”

Similarly, pork producers are grateful for secured markets in Canada and Mexico.

“Ratification of USMCA has been a top priority for the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC), and we thank members of the Senate who supported this critical trade deal,” said NPPC President David Herring, a hog farmer from Lillington, N.C. “USMCA provides U.S. pork producers with certainty in two of our largest export markets. It received strong support in both chambers of Congress, and we look forward to seeing President Trump sign it into law.”

USMCA includes some key wins for dairy exports.

“USMCA makes important strides to break down trade barriers, opening the door to new opportunities and supporting the flow of high-quality American dairy products to two valuable export markets,” said Tom Vilsack, president and CEO of U.S. Dairy Export Council. “The strong enforcement measures included in the final agreement give officials the tools necessary to hold our trade partners accountable and ensure the gains secured by USMCA are completely realized. We are grateful to the Administration for the sizable accomplishments secured in USMCA on dairy. With this trade deal complete, negotiators can now turn their attention to other key markets around the world in order to gain further ground for U.S. dairy.”

Next farmers will watch Canadian implementation to ensure full compliance.

“America’s dairy farmers are celebrating today’s bipartisan vote as a win. Under President Trump’s leadership, USTR and USDA negotiated an agreement that will deliver a more certain future for our dairy farmers and rural economy,” said Jim Mulhern, president and CEO of National Milk Producers Federation. “The U.S. must now remain diligent and proactively work with Canada and Mexico to implement USMCA in both letter and spirit. Full compliance is essential to achieving more fair trade with Canada and protecting American-made cheeses in Mexico.”

Not only were farmers thrilled with the trade deal progress, other industry groups also praised the deal.

Agriculture Retailers Association President and CEO Daren Coppock said in a statement that agricultural retailers and their farmer customers will directly benefit from the expanded market access and the preserved zero-tariff platforms among ag products, which is a relief during a challenging time in the ag economy.

“We applaud the efforts by the Trump administration and lawmakers on Capitol Hill for delivering this historic trade agreement to the finish line,” he said. “This agreement will advance the relationship between two of the most important markets for American farmers and agribusinesses.”

The Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) noted the importance USMCA will have for ethanol and distillers grains sales into Canada and Mexico.

“America’s ethanol producers look forward to seeing this important agreement in place. Canada and Mexico are among our most important and reliable export markets for both ethanol and distillers grains, and we look forward to strengthening our trading relationship with the two countries,” RFA President and CEO Geoff Cooper said. “USMCA is a good deal for the U.S. ethanol industry, the farmers who support us, and our industry’s partners in Canada and Mexico. We thank President Trump and Congress for getting this done.”

Equipment manufacturers thanked Congress for quick action as well.

“Equipment manufacturers, farmers, and hardworking families across the country are thankful for today’s full congressional ratification of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA),” said Kip Eideberg, Association of Equipment Manufacturers senior vice president of government and industry relations. “This new agreement updates the current, decades-old trade deal, supporting a modernized global marketplace. As members of the USMCA Coalition, we are proud to have joined more than 600 associations and business groups in advocating for a stronger trade deal that will add up to $68 billion to our economy, create 176,000 jobs, and preserve duty-free market access to our Canadian and Mexican trading partners. We applaud President Trump, Vice President Pence, Senate Majority Leader McConnell, and House Speaker Pelosi for their efforts to negotiate and ratify the agreement.”

The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) vice president of Stewardship and Sustainability Lara Moody today welcomed the U.S. Senate’s approval of the USMCA.

“We commend Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and members of the U.S. Senate for coming together in a bipartisan fashion to overwhelmingly approve the USMCA and we look forward to President Trump signing the deal as quickly as possible. This new agreement will provide the millions of hard-working men and women in U.S. agriculture with a huge economic win and allow them to compete on the global stage by ensuring that markets with our strongest trading partners remain open and fair,” said Moody. “Mexico and Canada are two of the United States’ biggest trading partners and together import over 60% of U.S. agricultural goods.”

Ag Industry Commends USMCA House Passage

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:32:45 GMT

The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday overwhelmingly passed the U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement (USMCA). Following the vote, the agriculture industry praised the House and urged the Senate to take action on the trade deal.

“I’ve long said that support for USMCA crosses political parties, the bipartisan passage of the agreement today is proof of that,” said Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, in a prepared statement. “I am pleased the House finally brought this agreement to a vote and encourage quick passage in the Senate. President Trump delivered on his promise to replace NAFTA, and USMCA is a huge success for America’s farmers and ranchers. This agreement will unleash the bounty of America’s agricultural harvest to two of our largest trading partners in the world, and it is critical to the success of rural America.”

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said in his statement that bipartisan House passage of the USMCA shows that President Donald Trump is changing trade policy so it “works for the benefit of American workers, farmers, ranchers and businesses.”

“The USMCA is expected to create between 176,000 and 589,000 new American jobs and substantially increase economic growth,” Lighthizer said. “The International Trade Commission’s analysis shows that USMCA will have a more positive impact on our economy, jobs and wages than any other U.S. trade agreement ever negotiated.”

Corn farmers have been working toward this vote for nearly a year, sending emails, having meetings and making phone calls to their representatives in support of USMCA, according to Kevin Ross president of the National Corn Growers Association.

“Agriculture should be incredibly proud to see these efforts pay off with such a strong, bipartisan vote,” he said, in a statement. “We wouldn’t be at this stage in the ratification process without the hard work of individual farmers across the country.”

Similarly, dairy industry leaders praised lawmakers for providing more market access in Mexico.

“USMCA will bring tangible benefits to the U.S. dairy industry by upgrading trade rules, opening the Canadian market to U.S. dairy exports and preserving our valuable market access in Mexico,” said Tom Vilsack, president and CEO of the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC). “Today’s bipartisan vote is indicative of the need to immediately secure these benefits for dairy and all of agriculture.”

Some pushed for the Senate to act quickly.

“Today’s vote brings us one step closer to finalizing USMCA and securing a more certain future for America’s farmers and ranchers,” said Jim Mulhern, president and CEO of The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF). “It is imperative that the Senate act now to finalize USMCA.”

National Cattlemen’s Beef Association (NCBA) President Jennifer Houston also urged Senate action.

“Today was a crucial win for all U.S. beef producers and a reassurance that U.S. beef will continue to have duty-free access to Canada and Mexico,” said Houston, in a prepared statement. “A big thank-you goes to the Trump Administration and every lawmaker who voted to approve USMCA. Of course, there is still more work left to do, so I urge the Senate to swiftly pass the USMCA and send it to the President’s desk.”

U.S. Meat Export Federation (USMEF) said ratification of USMCA is an important step in solidifying trade relations with Mexico and Canada, which are critical destinations for U.S. pork, beef and lamb.

“This agreement will bolster the United States’ position as a reliable supplier to two leading markets that currently account for about one-third of all U.S. red meat exports,” the organization said, in a statement. “We look forward to the Senate taking up this legislation as soon as possible and completing the ratification process.”

Agriculture retailers also praised the vote.

“There is no doubt the House passage of USMCA is a win for America’s farmers, agribusinesses and the communities they serve,” said Daren Coppock, Ag Retailers Association president and CEO. “This historic trade agreement will benefit agricultural retailers and their farmer customers by expanding market access and preserving zero-tariff platforms among ag products. The agreement is expected to increase ag exports and gross domestic product at a time when the ag economy sorely needs a boost.”

Read More:

Pig Farmers Applaud U.S. House for USMCA Passage

Homeland Security Recognizes Agriculture as Critical Industry

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:32:36 GMT

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued guidance on Thursday on critical industry workforce that should continue as the country addresses and responds to the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak. U.S. food and agriculture was included among 16 critical industries.

“If you work in a critical infrastructure industry, as defined by the Department of Homeland Security, such as healthcare services and pharmaceutical and food supply, you have a special responsibility to maintain your normal work schedule,” the guidance states.

The list of sectors and identified essential critical infrastructure workers are an initial recommended set by DHS and are intended to be overly inclusive, reflecting the diversity of industries across the U.S.

Specifically, DHS recognized these food and agriculture roles as critical:

• Animal agriculture workers to include those employed in veterinary health; manufacturing and distribution of animal medical materials, animal vaccines, animal drugs, feed ingredients, feed, and bedding, etc.; transportation of live animals, animal medical materials; transportation of deceased animals for disposal; raising of animals for food; animal production operations; slaughter and packing plants and associated regulatory and government workforce

• Farm workers to include those employed in animal food, feed, and ingredient production, packaging, and distribution; manufacturing, packaging, and distribution of veterinary drugs; truck delivery and transport; farm and fishery labor needed to produce our food supply domestically

• Farm workers and support service workers to include those who field crops; commodity inspection; fuel ethanol facilities; storage facilities; and other agricultural inputs

• Workers supporting groceries, pharmacies and other retail that sells food and beverage products

• Restaurant carry-out and quick serve food operations - Carry-out and delivery food employees

• Food manufacturer employees and their supplier employees—to include those employed in food processing (packers, meat processing, cheese plants, milk plants, produce, etc.) facilities; livestock, poultry, seafood slaughter facilities; pet and animal feed processing facilities; human food facilities producing by-products for animal food; beverage production facilities; and the production of food packaging

• Employees and firms supporting food, feed, and beverage distribution, including warehouse workers, vendor-managed inventory controllers and blockchain managers

• Workers supporting the sanitation of all food manufacturing processes and operations from wholesale to retail

• Company cafeterias - in-plant cafeterias used to feed employees

• Workers in food testing labs in private industries and in institutions of higher education

• Workers essential for assistance programs and government payments

• Employees of companies engaged in the production of chemicals, medicines, vaccines, and other substances used by the food and agriculture industry, including pesticides, herbicides, fertilizers, minerals, enrichments, and other agricultural production aids

• Workers who support the manufacture and distribution of forest products, including, but not limited to timber, paper, and other wood products

• Employees engaged in the manufacture and maintenance of equipment and other infrastructure necessary to agricultural production and distribution

“We thank DHS for acknowledging the vital role that pork producers play in helping to feed consumers here at home and around the globe with a high-quality, affordable protein,” says National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) President Howard “A.V.” Roth. “We recognize that states and local governments are working hard to ensure operational continuity. As part of that effort, we urge state and local governments to swiftly follow and implement this federal directive. We need to ensure there is a continuous and uninterrupted supply of pork to America’s kitchen tables.”

The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) President and CEO Corey Rosenbusch applauded DHS for listing fertilizer employees as essential and the fertilizer industry as one of the nation’s critical infrastructure industries.

“Fertilizer is responsible for 50% of crop yields and is essential to our nation’s agricultural production and food supply,” Rosenbusch says. “We thank the Trump administration for recognizing the critical role fertilizer plays in feeding our nation and the world.”

Other areas deemed as critical industries include healthcare and public health; emergency services; energy; water; nuclear reactors, materials and waste; transportation systems; dams; communications; information technology; government facilities; commercial facilities; critical manufacturing; financial; chemical; and defense industrial base.

Read more at agweb.com/coronavirus .

Election Guide: What The Election Means for Farmers and Ranchers

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:32:15 GMT

Election Analysis: Time for Bi-Partisanship?
Karla Thieman of The Russell Group joins us to talk about the election, the need for bi-partisanship, chances of a new aid package before the new year, and potential USDA secretary candidates under a Biden administration.

Pro Farmer’s Jim Wiesemeyer talks changes to ag policy under Biden
The Packer’s Tom Karst visited Nov. 16 with Jim Wiesemeyer, policy analyst with Pro Farmer about the November elections and what is ahead for agricultural policy in a Democratic administration. Watch here.

Ag And Food Groups Unveil Climate Policy Platform
As former Vice President Joe Biden prepares to address climate change across every federal agency in a new administration, a coalition of ag, food and environment groups is laying out a framework for how agriculture can address climate and sustainability. Watch here.

All Eyes on Georgia
AgriTalk host Chip Flory, newsman Davis Michaelsen, Farm Journal news director John Herath, Pro Farmer policy analyst Jim Wiesemeyer, and Farm CPA Paul Neiffer discuss the presidential and senate runoff races and run through the list of potential Secretary of Agriculture candidates.

Signal to Noise: Post Election Analysis
In this week’s DC Signal to Noise Podcast, Pro Farmers’s Jim Wiesemeyer and John Herath of Farm Journal look at the key outcomes of the Nov. 3 election and how the election will impact agriculture. The analysis includes a look at who might fill key ag positions in a new administration and new Congress and the outlook for coronavirus aid in a lame duck session.

What a Biden Administration Ag Policy Might Look Like
Delaware secretary of agriculture Michael Scuse joins Chip Flory on AgriTalk to provide some insight into what a Biden administration ag policy might look like, including carbon sequestration and climate change. Listen here:

Who Will Biden Tap for Secretary of Agriculture?
Pro Farmer’s Jim Wiesemeyer offers insights on AgDay.

Does a split Congress reduce the chance of wholesale changes in tax policy?
AgriTalk’s Chip Flory discusses the future with Farm CPA Paul Neiffer.

Election 2020: Who Should Ag Choose?

(Farm Journal)

Read commentaries from former USDA Secretary Tom Vilsack; Sid Miller, Texas Department of Agriculture; and from farmers on both sides. Check them out here.

After the Election: What’s Next for U.S. Agriculture?
Join Chip Flory, host of “AgriTalk,” as he leads a panel of farmers and ranchers in a discussion about the Nov. 3 election and its impact on U.S. agriculture.

Farm Journal Pulse Poll
In Campaign Home Stretch, Trump Holds Lock on Farm Vote. Read the complete analysis here .

(Farm Journal)

Biden to Nominate Vilsack for Return to USDA

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:32:09 GMT

WASHINGTON/CHICAGO (Reuters) - U.S. President-elect Joe Biden plans to nominate former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack for agriculture secretary, according to two sources familiar with the decision.

Vilsack, who led the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under former President Barack Obama, has a long relationship with Biden and served as a trusted adviser on rural issues during his campaign.

Vilsack’s return to the USDA is likely to be applauded by Midwestern states that produce the bulk of commodity crops like corn, soybeans and wheat, and prefer him to someone from another region of the country.

His spokeswoman, Regina Black, declined to comment “as an official announcement hasn’t been made.” The Biden transition office did not respond to a requests for comment on the choice.

The Farm Belt was battered by President Donald Trump’s trade war with China and waivers that exempted oil refiners from obligations to use corn-based ethanol. But Midwestern farmers also received an unprecedented amount of direct farm subsidies under Trump even as coronavirus stimulus for millions of other Americans stalled in Congress.

Vilsack is the chief executive of the U.S. Dairy Export Council and actively campaigned for Biden in farm states.

Iowa governor from 1999 to 2007, he is seen by establishment Democrats as a politically safe choice, largely because of his moderate politics, previous experience, and long-standing, friendly relationships with large-scale farmers.

A coalition of progressive food, farming and environmental advocacy groups promoted rival candidates.

Top among them was Democratic U.S. Representative Marcia Fudge of Ohio, who would have been the first Black woman to fill the role and had been expected to increase the department’s focus on small farmers, global environmental changes, and racial and economic diversity.

Biden has selected Fudge to be secretary of housing and urban development, Politico reported.

What Vilsack’s Return to USDA Would Mean for U.S. Farmers and Ranchers

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:32:09 GMT

As Joe Biden continues to craft his cabinet, news surfaced Tuesday night that former Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack will leave the U.S. Dairy Export Council to lead USDA .

Farm Journal Washington correspondent Jim Wiesemeyer says if the news is made official, it won’t be the first time an Agriculture Secretary has served under more than one Administration. Jim Wilson served as Ag Secretary from 1897 to 1913 and did so under three Administrations. However, Wiesemeyer says Vilsack will make history in another way.

“I don’t think we’ve ever seen an Ag secretary come back after being gone, so that’s interesting,” Wiesemeyer says.

Biden is expected to confirm his USDA Secretary nomination later this week, but Wiesemeyer says consensus is building Vilsack will be tapped.

“He’s a known commodity and amongst the ag sector, who worries about everything, but they don’t have to worry about Vilsack,” he adds. “He’s a consensus builder. I think that’s what’s needed.”

Chuck Conner, who served as Deputy Secretary for the US Department of Agriculture before being named president and CEO of National Council of Farmer Cooperatives (NCFC) in 2009, says agriculture is wading through intense uncertainty right now with coronavirus and other elements at play.

“Obviously coronavirus has thrown a whole new uncertainty on that as we are rapidly adjusting the way that we provide food to Americans in the midst of all that,” Conner says. “You couldn’t script any more uncertainty, and I think for farmers and rural Americans, another uncertainty was obviously government and the leadership of government.”

Conner says the possible appointment of Tom Vilsack as the next Agriculture Secretary removes another layer of uncertainty. While he’s served as president and CEO of the U.S. Dairy Export Council since 2017, he also worked directly with farm programs under the Obama Administration, with a deep understanding of row crops and USDA programs supporting farmers and ranchers.

“He’s a known entity,” Conner adds. “He’s a person who knows rural America. and I think that’s an uncertainty that we can sort of take off the table, if you will, to some extent and not have to deal with during these highly certain times. and you’ve got to believe that that’s a positive thing for farmers in rural America.”

Iowan Tom Vilsack has 8 yrs of experience leading the Dept of Agriculture. He also understands the importance of preserving the family farm & the significance of the biofuels industry
— Chuck Grassley (@ChuckGrassley) December 9, 2020

That known commodity aspect also received recognition from key members of Congress. Iowa Senator Charles Grassley tweeting out his approval Wednesday, saying Vilsack understands the importance of preserving the family farm, and the significance of the biofuels industry. Grassley’s approval is big, as he could be a key player in the approval of Vilsack in the Senate.

In addition to coronavirus response, Weisemeyer says another priority for the next Administration will directly tie into agriculture.

“Climate change is going to be the number one issue in his early years of the Administration,” he says. “Agriculture plays a big role in climate, as well as working with the EPA on the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program.”

Conner says based on the eight years Vilsack served as Agriculture Secretary under the Obama Administration, Vilsack proved he believes in science. Conner thinks that will be key in creating climate initiatives and priorities within agriculture.

“In the eight years that he was there, Tom Vilsack believed in science and believed in evaluating and government actions based upon the best available science,” says Conner. “That’s key in this climate debate, because obviously, there are circumstances where there’s a lot of hype and a lot of enthusiasm on issues that may not have a whole lot of science backing to them.”

Conner says his experience with Vilsack leads him to believe Vilsack will be passionate about climate change as Agriculture Secretary, but will use science to back up whatever path USDA takes.

National Farmers Union (NFU) issued a statement Tuesday nigh t after news about Vilsack’s possible appointment surfaced, saying, “After eight years leading USDA, Tom Vilsack has the necessary qualifications and experience to steer the agency through these turbulent times.”

American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) president Zippy Duvall followed with a statement Wednesday applauding Vilsack on his ability to rise above partisanship to serve farmers and ranchers. Duvall went on to say, “Tom Vilsack understands that the agriculture sector is far more complex than most people understand. He believes in a ‘big tent’ philosophy that supports all types of production and understands the importance of respecting farmers and ranchers as partners worthy of support in the race to achieve sustainability goals.”

While Vilsack will work to shape future agriculture policy, he will also be tasked with possibly implementing the next Farm Bill. In addition to that, Conner says it will be interesting to see what direction Vilsack takes.

“We’re all sort of now evaluating what were the loose ends when he left office,” says Conner. “I think there’s a lot of issues out there relative to competition in the marketplace that were still pending when he left last time. It’ll be interesting to see if he picks up a lot of those sort of competitiveness issues, particularly in the meat sector that could very well resurface again, and we’ll be watching those to see which direction he may be headed on that.”

As agriculture awaits official word on leadership—and priorities—of the next USDA, the new Agriculture Secretary will have a big task: find bipartisan solutions to help shape the future of agriculture policy.

Related Stories:

Report: Vilsack to Return as Agriculture Secretary

Manchin Blocks Biden's Build Back Better Climate and Social Agenda, What Happens Now?

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:31:47 GMT

Lawmakers may have left town, but centrist Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) left no doubt that he cannot support President Biden’s $1.75 trillion (or higher) social and climate spending plan, imperiling the president’s agenda. Manchin cited rising consumer prices, a growing federal debt and the arrival of a new coronavirus variant as reasons he could not supply his must-have vote to help his party adopt its signature spending package.

Manchin said Sunday that he cannot support the House-passed version of the social spending package that would have extended child tax credits and provided new subsidies for childcare, preschool and elder care. “I cannot vote to continue with this piece of legislation. I just can’t,” Manchin said on Fox News Sunday. “I’ve tried everything humanly possible. I can’t get there. This is a no on this legislation.”

The Senate left town Sunday morning without voting on the bill (House departed earlier), which Democrats call Build Back Better (BBB). In a statement Thursday evening, Biden expressed optimism that talks would continue into the new year and eventually lead to an agreement. But Manchin, whose reluctance to get behind the legislation has grown as inflation has risen to levels not seen in decades, now sounds like his mind is made up. Some Democrats say this is Manchin’s typical wage of getting leverage, possibly on a pared-down version of the House-passed legislation.

“I’ve tried. I mean I really did. And the president was trying as hard as he could,” Manchin said. “He has an awful lot of irons in the fire right now. A lot. More on his plate than he needs for this to continue.”

White House Responds

The White House issued an aggressive statement on Manchin. White House press secretary Jen Psaki said had previously assured President Biden he would support some version of the bill and that negotiations were continuing. “If his comments on Fox and written statement indicate an end to that effort, they represent a sudden and inexplicable reversal in his position, and a breach of his commitments to the President and the Senator’s colleagues in the House and Senate,” Psaki said in a statement. Manchin reportedly informed the administration of his move shortly before going on television Sunday. Top White House officials scrambled to call the senator and talk him out of what he was about to do. “We tried to head him off,” a senior White House official told Politico, but Manchin “refused to take a call from White House staff.”

Manchin expanded on his no reasoning — and offered even harsher words for his fellow Democrats — in a statement issued shortly after his television appearance. “My Democratic colleagues in Washington are determined to dramatically reshape our society in a way that leaves our country even more vulnerable to the threats we face,” he said. “I cannot take that risk with a staggering debt of more than $29 trillion and inflation taxes that are real and harmful to every hard-working American at the gasoline pumps, grocery stores and utility bills with no end in sight.”

Manchin, up for re-election in 2024 in a state that Biden lost by 40 points, also cited a second Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report, which Republicans requested, that determined the legislation would cost $4.5 trillion if the subsidies and credits included were extended. The White House dismissed that CBO score as “fake,” arguing that the proposal as written would cost far less and be fully paid for.

Initial Impact

The legislation’s demise means the expiration next month of the 2021 child tax credit that had given qualifying families up to $300 per month for each child under age 6 and up to $250 per month for each child ages 6 through 17. The Biden administration is exploring the possibility of providing double payments in February to make up the shortfall, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Friday. Pushing off the president’s economic agenda until next year means that the payments, which have been sent to families for the past six months but expired Wednesday, are unlikely to be ready for Jan. 15. Psaki said the delayed payments could come in February if the president’s tax-and-spend proposal, which has been put off until after the New Year, gets through Congress in January. “If we get it done in January, we’ve talked to Treasury officials and others about doing double payments in February as an option,” Psaki told reporters aboard Air Force One. The Internal Revenue Service had sought enactment of the bill before Dec. 28 to ensure Jan. 15 payments went out on time.

Other impacts include new proposals to subsidize the cost of childcare, preschool and elder care are off the table, for now. The White House had argued such benefits were a prudent response to rising inflation. Manchin’s comments put at risk a $555 billion package of tax credits, grants and other policies aimed at lowering greenhouse gas emissions.

Harsh Criticism by Sanders

Sanders comments. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was among the first to react to Manchin’s statement. During an interview on CNN, Sanders said Manchin will have to explain to his constituents in West Virginia, “a state that is struggling,” why he’d stand in the way of new Medicare subsidies for dental coverage and investments aimed at combating climate change. “Let Mr. Manchin explain to the people why he doesn’t have the guts to stand up to powerful special interests,” Sanders said, calling for a full Senate vote on the legislation next month even if the bill fails. “We’ve been dealing with Mr. Manchin for month after month after month,” Sanders said. “But if he doesn’t have the courage to do the right thing for the working families of West Virginia and America, let him vote no in front of the whole world.”

Bottom line:

Manchin’s comments appear to be a solid no and lawmakers are not used to being so specific. BB is dead. Some Dems hope for a new, more Manchin-shaped bill that includes some key pieces of the Biden climate and social policy agenda.

EPA on Standby as Supreme Court Reconsiders WOTUS Rulings

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:31:41 GMT

Supreme Court justices said earlier this week they will consider a 15-year-long Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) issue involving a couple — the Sacketts — from Idaho who previously pleaded and won a case regarding their building a home near Priest Lake.

EPA says the half-acre lot the couple built their home on contains wetlands, placing the land under the jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, the Sacketts would have required a permit to build on the land.

The Sacketts have since filed a petition, disputing the EPA’s determination that the lot is considered wetland. The Pacific Legal Foundation has chosen to represent the couple to show their support — along with 21 states, various businesses and interest groups.

Damien Schiff, Pacific Legal Foundation Lawyer, says the case is emblematic of the wrongdoings in the Clean Water Act. Of the half-acre lot, he says, “It lacks a surface water connection to any stream, creek, lake or other water body, and it shouldn’t be subject to federal regulation and permitting.”

Zippy Duvall, American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) president, commented on the U.S. Supreme Court decision saying the group is pleased with the WOTUS issue being taken up in court once more:

“Farmers and ranchers share the goal of protecting the resources they’re entrusted with, but they shouldn’t need a team of lawyers to farm their land,” he says. “We call on EPA to push pause on its plan to write a new WOTUS rule until it has more guidance on which waters fall under federal jurisdiction.”

On Dec. 7, 2021, EPA and the Department of the Army announced a proposed rule to revise the definition of the “waters of the U.S.,” with intent to reestablish the pre-2015 definition.

The AFBF suggests EPA halt their plan to rewrite WOTUS until it has more guidance in deciding which waters are categorized under the federal jurisdiction.

Read more:
> The EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are seeking comment on the pre-2015 WOTUS rule published in the Federal Register.
> In early May of 2020, the Biden Administration unveiled the name and additional details of the plan to conserve 30% of U.S. land and water by the year 2030.

Ocean Shipping Reform Act May See the Resolute Desk

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:31:35 GMT

On Tuesday, the Senate Commerce Committee passed the Ocean Shipping Reform Act (OSRA), establishing Senate committee support for shipping supply chain challenges.

OSRA would help agricultural exporters by leveling the playing field for American exports, making it harder for ocean carriers to unreasonably refuse goods ready to export at ports. The bill would place guardrails on the ocean carriers’ actions by giving the Federal Maritime Commission rulemaking authority to regulate carrier practices.

In her Senate Commerce Committee opening statement, Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) stressed the importance of passing OSRA, saying farmers don’t want special treatment, they simply don’t want to be “exploited” for profit.

“We also know here, in the Committee, that these ocean shipping companies are making record profits,” she said. “They have made $150 billion in profits in 2021, and ocean import volume for the first quarter of this year is forecast to increase by more than 30%.”

U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC) and National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) applauded the passage and urged Congress to “expeditiously” advance the process to ease agricultural exports.

Zippy Duvall, AFBF president echoed USDEC and NMPF, sharing his team is “pleased” with the Senate Commerce Committee’s work in moving the legislation to the Senate floor.

“Ongoing supply chain issues and record-high shipping costs threaten to limit exports at a time when our trading partners are increasingly relying on America’s farmers and ranchers,” he says. “Limiting trade also negatively affects farmers’ ability to get much-needed supplies like fertilizer, which ultimately drives up the cost of growing food for America’s families.”

In December 2021, the House passed OSRA under the Creating Opportunities for Manufacturing, Pre-Eminence in Technology, and Economic Strength (COMPETES) Act. The U.S. Senate will vote on OSRA in coming weeks, as Congress commences conference procedures.

More on ag exports:

> House Passes U.S. Ocean Shipping Reform Act

> Seattle Selected for Port Pop-Up to Ease Ag Supply Chain

> Will The USDA Pop-Up Site Solve The Clogged Ports Issue?

What’s Your Take on the 2018 Farm Bill?

Tue, 20 Sep 2022 02:31:29 GMT

U.S. House Agriculture Committee is seeking feedback on the previous Farm Bill in preparation for the upcoming 2023 Farm Bill .

Glenn Thompson (R-Pa.), House Ag republican leader, says farm bill feedback is “critical” with 2023 Farm Bill discussions in full swing.

“Hearing directly from farm country about what’s working and what’s not is the only way to ensure we craft a bill that meets the needs of rural America,” said Thompson.

House Ag Chairman David Scott (D-Ga.) “strongly encourages” producers to add their inputs on how the 2018 Farm Bill has or has not met their needs so as to craft a new bill that’s better suited for the people.

2018 Farm Bill feedback can be submitted through the online form .

More at Stake

Election midterms are around the corner. Randy Russell, president of The Russell Group, says the direction of 2022 elections will largely determine the 2023 Farm Bill parameters.

“If the House does flip, Glenn Thompson will become chair and that’s a very influential position over the Senate,” he says. “Even if Republicans were to take control, you’re still going to need Democratic votes to pass a farm bill.”

While party control is important to consider, Russell feels the primary farm bill angle—no matter who is running the gavel—will be focused on nutrition.

“If you take the 2023 Farm Bill and extend it for 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the total cost would be $1.3 trillion. Of that $1.3 trillion, $1 trillion is in nutrition,” says Russell. “I think that’s going to set up a debate about the role of nutrition versus farm program, among other aspects of the farm bill.”

Support for farm programs, crop insurance, trade programs, ag research and food safety will come down to balancing the scale with the $1 trillion nutrition price tag, according to Russell. He says “we’ve got to be willing to make a deal on the nutrition side” to attract votes from urban and suburban politicians.

The next 2023 Farm Bill review will take place on July 20, where House Ag Committee members will consider title XI crop insurance.

More on the coming farm bill:

Farm Bill 2023 Drives Up the Heat in House Ag Committee Hearing

Factors That Will Shape the 2023 Farm Bill