The Washington Post’s article about the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is a solar eclipse, the USDA said in a release Monday.
Following a 20-year evaluation in five market hog establishments, FSIS put forth a proposed rule in February 2018 to the American public – beginning a full and transparent notice and comment rule-making process. The proposed rule includes a voluntary, opt-in inspection system, called New Swine Slaughter Inspection System (NSIS), for market hog establishments, and separate mandatory testing requirements for all swine establishments.
This proposal and the research supporting it spans two decades, USDA said. FSIS’s work to modernize inspection spans the last four presidential administrations.
On April 3, The Washington Post published a story titled, “Pork industry soon will have more power over meat inspections,” deciding to reprint the talking points of special interest groups while claiming the agency declined interview requests. As a federal regulatory agency, FSIS cannot litigate or conduct rulemaking through the media.
“FSIS is appalled at The Washington Post’s poor attempt at explaining a proposal to modernize inspection,” the USDA release said. “The Post’s decision to continue to parrot arguments that are devoid of factual and scientific evidence only serves to further the personal agenda of special interest groups that have nothing to do with ensuring food safety.”
FSIS spent countless hours responding to The Post and providing clarification about the proposed rule, but these perspectives did not make it in the article, USDA said.
Setting the Record Straight
Only federal inspectors do meat inspections. Contrary to misstatements in the article, only federal inspectors can apply the USDA mark of inspection, which consumers rely on to know their meat is safe. The pork industry will not have power over meat inspections. Meat inspectors will.
“Much has changed since the 1967 Wholesome Meat Act, including the old “poke and sniff” methods that were developed using an outdated understanding of risk and disease,” USDA said. “With modernized hog slaughter, FSIS is moving inspection closer to an approach supported by current food safety science. In fact, FSIS conducted a 20-year pilot called the HACCP-Based Inspection Model Project (HIMP) in five market hog establishments. The pilot has been ongoing throughout four presidential administrations producing the safest food supply in the world. Modernizing inspection through science is clearly in the best interest of public health.”
Under the proposed rule, FSIS inspectors would continue to conduct 100% ante-mortem inspection and 100% carcass-by-carcass inspection at post-mortem.
This is not a Trump administration action. USDA said it is deliberately misleading to say this is the Trump administration’s decision. This particular modernized approach to inspection was proposed and finalized for poultry under the Obama administration in 2014. The plans and data gathering for this proposal started in the early 1990s under the Clinton administration. Since then, dozens of food safety leaders regardless of administration or party, have attempted to modernize inspection.
USDA is not decreasing the number of federal inspectors. FSIS is not reducing the total number of federal inspectors by 40% as the article states, USDA said. They will not be replacing inspection personnel with plant employees that will conduct inspections. FSIS will continue making inspection staff determinations on a case-by-case basis to ensure proper protocols are followed. If the proposed rule becomes final, federal inspectors will not be performing quality assurance tasks so they are able to focus on critically important activities, USDA said.
USDA does have a plan for testing pork cuts and other pork products for Salmonella. “The Washington Post deliberately misleads readers here because the facts did not fit their headline and opinion. As we explained in the proposed rule, FSIS discontinued its Salmonella verification sampling program for market hogs (carcasses) in 2011. Why? Because we were finding very low rates of Salmonella on whole carcasses,” USDA said.
In the proposed rule, FSIS is removing the carcass Salmonella performance standards for market hogs because the standards have not been used since 2011 and the standards were not being verified because of the low rates of Salmonella on whole carcasses.
FSIS currently tests pork cuts and other pork products (different from whole carcasses) for Salmonella and will decide in 2019 whether to develop new pathogen performance standards for these products or take other actions to address Salmonella in these products. This is in line with what we told the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in public documents, USDA reported.
Plant worker safety is a priority for USDA. The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has jurisdiction over plant worker safety. However, FSIS recognizes that worker safety in swine slaughter establishments is a critical issue. The Washington Post failed to include OSHA, USDA said, even though this is the federal agency that has statutory and regulatory authority to enforce workplace safety and health.
Read USDA’s full statement.
More from Farm Journal's PORK: